Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Russo, Sternberg, DeRosa I had been told had potential. On the other hand I remember hearing last year that Gerace had opted not to come back. But generally I was surprised that the roster went down to 31 instead of just being trimmed to 35.which were the changes that surprised you?
Baseball is a partial sport so you have different percentages 30 40 60 ect. It used to be that you could give 1 percent in theory. Now if you offer any money it must be at least 25 percent. Generally speaking the pitchers and the players up the middle get the most catcher short centerfield. However, it wouldnt be unusual for a lower level program to offer a 100 percent to a pitcher or position player that would be getting solid money at a big program to try and and get them. Also there is academic money in baseball that wouldnt count against scholarships number.
In general, not surprising. But in this particular instance, I did find it a bit surprising. With 38 on the roster for the fall semester, we knew there would be no more than 35 for the spring. I thought it was just surprising that it went all the way to 31, 4 under the limit.There is always going to be turnover with new regimes ESPECIALLY in Olympic spirts where fewer kids are on full scholarships et al. Nothing surprising here.
I understand what you are saying, and I think it’s a given that the lineup will be much stronger. Partially because it was shaping up to be a bit stronger even if the old regime had remained, and partially because the new staff is making it stronger yet. But I don’t understand cutting below 35; you never know when a couple of injuries at the same position will happen, and the roster can’t be replenished mid season. I just expected roster cuts to 35 this year, and for more cuts next season when new recruits are lined up to take those spots.I think owens has brought in multiple players for a single roster spot in the past and I like it in general with the last few. Also with the roster and the most recent class it was obviously litterio's so he may well have not wanted certain guys which could explain cutting to 31. Derosa hadnt done much and russo was decent in limited time as a frosh. Though with rodriguez and scheikofer I am thinking the of will be much better.
In general, not surprising. But in this particular instance, I did find it a bit surprising. With 38 on the roster for the fall semester, we knew there would be no more than 35 for the spring. I thought it was just surprising that it went all the way to 31, 4 under the limit.