Maybe he did, but no takers at that time.One thing I don’t understand. Why didn’t Schiano hit the portal for OLs last year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe he did, but no takers at that time.One thing I don’t understand. Why didn’t Schiano hit the portal for OLs last year?
And the biggest pressure to live up to his OC reputation too. Should be really interesting now that he can design plays that take a little time to create.Biggest winner = Gleason, he’ll be a genius again (you need the horses)
Beyond absurd that they're ranked at all going into next season. 78th in Sagarin, at 6-6, with the nation's 78th most difficult schedule last year. They also play @Wake, @ND, @VT, @FSU and @NCState with Clemson at home this season so kinda not getting this one at all.Looks like BC may be ranked (20-25) heading into the season opener from some early 2022 rankings I've seen. That would be incredible to get our first ranked win in (a decade?) at BC in their home opener!
One thing I don’t understand. Why didn’t Schiano hit the portal for OLs last year?
Gotta link?Looks like BC may be ranked (20-25) heading into the season opener from some early 2022 rankings I've seen. That would be incredible to get our first ranked win in (a decade?) at BC in their home opener!
Yes, I think the winners are those of us that appreciate some Road Grader in our offense.Put Johnny Football behind the OL and let him run!
It was after a COVID year. Difficult to evaluate talent.One thing I don’t understand. Why didn’t Schiano hit the portal for OLs last year?
Certainly being a B1G member for GS2 helps with the sales pitch.I remember GS, in an interview back before he left for TB, talking about how we had improved recruiting a lot, but that we were stuck getting either big players, or athletic/fast players, but still hadn’t leapt the hurdle that was recruiting big and fast players.
Seems he’s figured that out now.
Vedral has no chance of being a loser in this- Kid has played a lot of years as a starter and his goals are to get a degree and get into coaching. If he is not the starter next year and can mentor a young GW, he is getting a huge headstart on his future goals.Vedral may also be a big loser in all this. If the line is much improved , schiano and company may be more inclined to go to wimstatt if they know he won’t get killed back there. And if wimstatt stays healthy , less playing time for vedral.
Not sure about the other guys but Ireland Brown was getting time at DT before they moved him to guard out of necessity. Also, we lose Turner who was an every down player at NT.Lots of comments on some DL to OL guys moving back to the DL. I just don’t think that’s how it works. If good enough to get on field at DL they would still be there. Unfortunately if you move from DL to OL, the next stop is lower level.
As far as playing time goes ….jeez !!!Vedral has no chance of being a loser in this- Kid has played a lot of years as a starter and his goals are to get a degree and get into coaching. If he is not the starter next year and can mentor a young GW, he is getting a huge headstart on his future goals.
Their QB is a legit Heisman candidate…better than Flutie lol.Yeah BC got in bowl game because they only have 8 conference games, we have nine.
Vedrals experience is worthless in my opinion because he literally has no throwing talent whatsoeverIt's possible. I think a lot of decision-making about the starting QB will be based on the strength (or weakness) of the WR and TE rooms.
If I had to bet, I'd still bet that Vedral will start next season. While Wimsatt clearly has more natural talent, both passing and running, he lacks the depth of experience Vedral has at recognizing the defense. and running the offense. And it's seemed that GS/Gleeson really value that particular aspect of QB play.
But I also won't be surprised to see QB by committee between Vedral and Wimsatt. Doing so could present difficulties for opponent's DCs. Especially if both QBs are used for pretty much all kinds of plays, so the DC cannot guess at the play based on which QB is in at any given time. And showing more of a certain type of play for one QB the week before, and then swapping that the following week could bluff a DC that tries to guess what we're going to do.
The obvious downside of that approach is that they'd have to share snaps in practice which could interfere with the rhythm that gets established between QB and receivers. But our passing game, so far under Schiano, hasn't seemingly relied much on timing passes past the LOS (it has had timing passes behind the LOS). And rhythm probably matters most in timing passes.
Unlike most others here, I have no preference and I trust the coaching staff to make the right decision on who starts. I also trust that they will be reasonably quick to change things up when we're struggling.
I'm excited to see their choice.
Vedrals experience is worthless in my opinion because he literally has no throwing talent whatsoever
How. Have you seen vedral throw? He can't even throw screen passes accurately.Twaddle
You're entitled to your opinion but it's pretty clear the coaching staff feel otherwise. It's possible the coaching staff be able to get Wimsatt developed to a point where he starts in the first game of 2022. But I'm sticking with my guess that it'll be Vedral who starts in the first game.Vedrals experience is worthless in my opinion because he literally has no throwing talent whatsoever
Oh if I was betting on who would start, its probably Vedral. That being said he has the worst arm talent of any qb on the roster, probably the conference, and maybe the entire country.You're entitled to your opinion but it's pretty clear the coaching staff feel otherwise. It's possible the coaching staff be able to get Wimsatt developed to a point where he starts in the first game of 2022. But I'm sticking with my guess that it'll be Vedral who starts in the first game.
In games in 2020, plus a few in 2021, most where he had enough time to go through progressions and where our WRs or TEs or RBs were able to get a bit of separation, Vedral was able to get them the ball.Oh if I was betting on who would start, its probably Vedral. That being said he has the worst arm talent of any qb on the roster, probably the conference, and maybe the entire country.
But he probably has the best "grasp" of the offense which will help him immensely.
Funny that you should mention that. It was one of the things he used to say that had stuck with me all these years as well. How there weren't many really big athletic guys around. He has a lot more credibility this go around. Being in the Big Ten sure helps too.I remember GS, in an interview back before he left for TB, talking about how we had improved recruiting a lot, but that we were stuck getting either big players, or athletic/fast players, but still hadn’t leapt the hurdle that was recruiting big and fast players.
Seems he’s figured that out now.
He did. We missed on a couple and landed Cedrice Paillant who was in the rotation this past season.One thing I don’t understand. Why didn’t Schiano hit the portal for OLs last year?
They should. Can’t believe we have not used the TEs all that much in the passing game.To think we may be able to use our TEs for something other than pass protection. Watch Langan and Konopka become Gavins security blankets.