You summed it up perfectly why Eddie will be back next year. There is no need to extend this year. He locks up this class and then no ships to give next class.
Thank you.
Now maybe we put that argument to bed once and for all.
You summed it up perfectly why Eddie will be back next year. There is no need to extend this year. He locks up this class and then no ships to give next class.
Why?
Jordan already has 3 guys locked up for next season.
I am sure he will get a 4th.
Lack of contract extension is not keeping these guys from signing.
How many scholarships do we have available for the following class?
I thought I heard it might only be 1 or even 0.
If that is true, it would not really hurt anything to let him coach 1 more season and see where we are at that point.
If we stink, we fire him and only lose 1 year buyout.
If we surprise, you can extend him at that point.
Plus, we would be 1 year closer to the new facitlity, and it would be easier for the next guy to recruit with shovels (hopefully) in the ground by then.
When a new coach is hired, he is in a honeymoon phase, and will hopefully be able to sell a vision.
New facilities would help make the sell.
If the new coach has to wait an extra year for facilities to become reality, I fear he would not have that initial bump in recruiting that we will need.
It's comical.exactly...and the spin continues on this board...I know for act everyone would be giddy if Chuba signed and now they turn to the next so called hidden gem recruited by dregs
You summed it up perfectly why Eddie will be back next year. There is no need to extend this year. He locks up this class and then no ships to give next class.
God, this is all so depressing! Never a single bit of good news and Eddie says we don't understand. If I underperformed so drastically at my job (and make a fraction of what he does), I would be on the unemployment line.
Good luck with that...roster turnover happens at every program and has been a given with Eddie as each year multiple players left or renegged on their verbal
"Locking" up this class? Interesting way to refer to how EJ arrived at this class. Somehow, locking it up just doesn't seem right.
Nor does the belief that this team's roster will be static up to and through even next year's recruiting season. Nor does the notion that keeping a not-good coach around for another year won't do further and deep damage but instead will be a good thing. Nor does the notion that one more year of this will do anything but make it harder on the next guy and worse for RU overall. And, most of all, nor does the notion that it's worth waiting yet another year to determine whether what we've been seeing with EJ, all the way down to this year's recruiting debacle and team performance, has all been a mirage and he might turn out to be a coach we should extend.
Sometimes I wonder whether the act of even discussing whether EJ has earned another year has simply masked what a crazy, historically, unfathomably bad season this has been, how revealing and terrible it was to swing and miss on all recruiting in the fall, and how incomprehensible it is to have some NJ basketball coaches saying in an article that they don't see our coach or know his assistants. Another year won't be a good thing in any way. It will be bad. There won't be a silver lining to it. And the only reason it might happen is money, but that would be short-sighted.
I'm not saying Eddie HAS to return next year, I am just saying we don't have to extend him after this season in order to keep recruiting viable.
Also - if Eddie's limited contract is such an issue, why are these 3 Spring verbals coming on board if Eddie currently only has 2 years on contract remaining?
And if we fire Jordan, I really don't want to lose Sanders. Maybe you don't keep Jordan just for that reason, but it is a consideration.
Again, I am not in love with Jordan by any means.
Ohio even put me on his ignore list because of my criticisms of EJ!
Hang on to this one - roll it back out in MayYou summed it up perfectly why Eddie will be back next year. There is no need to extend this year. He locks up this class and then no ships to give next class.
Nigel Johnson is a legit monster baller. Just as good as Corey. Worth 4-5 wins.
God bless you sir.Nigel Johnson is a legit monster baller. Just as good as Corey. Worth 4-5 wins.
So Corey is more important than the program?
Nigel Johnson is a legit monster baller. Just as good as Corey. Worth 4-5 wins.
Thanks, didn't realize how outrageous the Kansas State backcourt must have been last year so that the Monster Baller could only get starts when someone was injured. Hey, who were those guys?Nigel Johnson is a legit monster baller. Just as good as Corey. Worth 4-5 wins.
Thank you--wonder if Prov, VCU, DePaul also stopped recruiting him.We stopped recruiting Ohams a couple of weeks ago. I would have saved everyone the trouble of this thread if I knew anyone cared...hard to tell from reading the boards these days.
Skills are important in basketball, too. That's something that Rutgers teams have lacked for the better part of the last 30 years. All of the better teams in the B1G have guys with length and long arms. Their lengthy long-armed guys can play defense and shoot the damn ball.This would be another nice piece. WHY? Another guy with length and long arms to go along with Dailey and Thiam. Length and long arms are so important in basketball. Something that Rutgers has lacked for a long time, since the Waters era.
BK is an island of calm in a sea of very angry and bitter sharks..
Spot on.It's a shame that a program insider who could provide a lot of information has been driven off by the same 5 or so clowns constantly beating the drum of negativity. They will not be content until the entire board consists of the same 5 posters saying the same thing over and over.
One of these guys tried the same thing on the women's basketball board...thankfully she shot that down and that board is focused on fans discussing basketball in a positive and respectful manner.
Unless he chooses another school Then we didn'tWe want Aleem Ford.
The same nonsense was heard on the football boards when verbals flipped and then the response was that the players were not that good in the first place.Its called sour grapes regardless the sport.It's comical.
This guy I never heard of is talked up for weeks by the Eddie fan club. While he's predicted 100% to RU we hear about his potential, length, etc. See the early posts in this thread.
Then he picks Fordam and there is immediately a new narrative of why we want no part of him. Also, we have better targets. The guys endlessly touting him clam up and the prospect who was talked up for weeks never existed. No one questions Eddie's talent evaluation or ability to close.
The funny (or maybe sad) thing is that the spin is so easy with this level of prospect because they're so under the radar. The next CJ Fair one minute, damaged goods the next...
Seems like we have a lot of these fans.The same nonsense was heard on the football boards when verbals flipped and then the response was that the players were not that good in the first place.Its called sour grapes regardless the sport.