ADVERTISEMENT

Curious about the 2 Deep

yesrutgers01

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Nov 9, 2008
34,993
35,069
113
Over the past few years, I have heard how bad Flood's recruiting classes are. and now, in the past couple of days, I see alarm from many of the same posters that true freshmen and RS freshmen are on the 2 deep...

So, is Flood only promoting kids because he wants to proves his classes are good, or were his classes actually good?
 
Flood's recruiting classes have not been very strong. Only a minority of the kids in the classes had offers from multiple top programs and, in too many cases, the only other schools that thought the recruit was good enough to warrant an offer were Monmouth, Temple and their ilk.

With the exception of the Maryland game (truly great comeback, albeit against a barely .500 team), Flood's teams have performed in a manner consistent with his recruiting - can't win vs P5 teams with winning records. This year we will see more of his recruits on the field. Maybe that will change.
 
Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Flood's recruiting classes have not been very strong. Only a minority of the kids in the classes had offers from multiple top programs and, in too many cases, the only other schools that thought the recruit was good enough to warrant an offer were Monmouth, Temple and their ilk.

With the exception of the Maryland game (truly great comeback, albeit against a barely .500 team), Flood's teams have performed in a manner consistent with his recruiting - can't win vs P5 teams with winning records. This year we will see more of his recruits on the field. Maybe that will change.
People also have to give credit where credit is due. For the most part, Flood always beats the teams that he should beat. He never had a WTF game last year. The TTFP game was a loss to an evenly matched team. The closest would probably be the Howard game.
 
Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Flood's recruiting classes have not been very strong. Only a minority of the kids in the classes had offers from multiple top programs and, in too many cases, the only other schools that thought the recruit was good enough to warrant an offer were Monmouth, Temple and their ilk.

With the exception of the Maryland game (truly great comeback, albeit against a barely .500 team), Flood's teams have performed in a manner consistent with his recruiting - can't win vs P5 teams with winning records. This year we will see more of his recruits on the field. Maybe that will change.
You are truly myopic. Every one of the 4 new team members has already exceeded the expectations associated with his ratings. The difference is attitude and willingness to put in the effort to excel.
 
Blessuan Austin is going to be one of the guys that are going to contribute right away, he was a huge pickup and was really underrated by rivals. He and Kiy are going to be two freshman/RS freshman that will break the 2 deep easily. I really believe that the strength and conditioning improvements this year are going to show on the field, especially with getting these younger guys ready to go.
 
There are a number of guys on the 2 deep because vets will not be practicing this spring.
 
Blessuan Austin is going to be one of the guys that are going to contribute right away, he was a huge pickup and was really underrated by rivals. He and Kiy are going to be two freshman/RS freshman that will break the 2 deep easily. I really believe that the strength and conditioning improvements this year are going to show on the field, especially with getting these younger guys ready to go.


Why are there two freshmen breaking in the defensive back 2 deep when we had so many problems with new DB the last two years? These DB don't need experience or are they going to learn on the job? I see a true FR linebacker also is in the 2 deep. No experience required or learning on the job.



Flood has already four recruiting classes 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. There is only 1 recruiting class from Schiano in 2011. By next year, all the players would have been recruited by Flood.

This post was edited on 3/30 11:23 PM by rutgersdave
 
Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Flood's recruiting classes have not been very strong. Only a minority of the kids in the classes had offers from multiple top programs and, in too many cases, the only other schools that thought the recruit was good enough to warrant an offer were Monmouth, Temple and their ilk.

With the exception of the Maryland game (truly great comeback, albeit against a barely .500 team), Flood's teams have performed in a manner consistent with his recruiting - can't win vs P5 teams with winning records. This year we will see more of his recruits on the field. Maybe that will change.
People keep on saying this and while I think we missed out on kids he classes are not as bad as people want to believe. I commented on another board about individual performances and how we forget about them. It applies here as well:
Marin and Hicks are both Flood recruits who I'd assume everyone is happy with.
Grant, although his hands are shaky at times dominated the Maryland game and had some real good catches against Michigan.
Turay?????
Tsimis had some real timely catches
4th and short early against Wazzu and walk on Flannigan converts for the first.
The forgotten man in Goodwin had some huge runs against Navy and a pick at Wazzu.
Cioffi fumble recovery at Wazzu and NC.
i could go on and on but honest people see it. Yes, some 4 stars like Hamilton and Caroo are cornerstones but if you look at the wins, many if not most, of the big plays are Flood recruits. Now, if you are looking for NC type teams....he ain't getting it done. Solid 7,8,9 win teams and we are right on schedule.
 
I see 6 players recruited from 2013 that have seen the field out of 22 recruits and maybe 1-2 starters. A lot of them left the program already. From 2011 recruiting class there were about 11 that were starters or were significant contributors. From the 2012 class there were about 12 starters or significant contributors. 2013 recruiting class was not deep enough since half the class should be contributing on the field. Looking at the 2014 class, many of them have left the program already.


That is a problem when you have a few good players but you need about 11-12 good players recruited each year. You can not field a team with only 6-7 good players every year. You need at least 11 good players a year.


This post was edited on 3/30 11:59 PM by rutgersdave
 
Originally posted by yesrutgers01:

Over the past few years, I have heard how bad Flood's recruiting classes are. and now, in the past couple of days, I see alarm from many of the same posters that true freshmen and RS freshmen are on the 2 deep...
Originally posted by rutgersdave:
I see 6 players recruited from 2013 that have seen the field out of 22 recruits and maybe 1-2 starters. A lot of them left the program already.



Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Flood's recruiting classes have not been very strong.

Constant complaining about recruiting classes? Check

Saying its bad that too many freshman are playing? Check

Argument saying not enough freshman contributed? Check (make up your mind. flood loses whether they contribute or not?)

A "nightmare scenario" in which only 6 true freshman had to burn their redshirt to have an 8 win season. Yea that NEVER happens anywhere else. What an awful season we had. 8 wins. god awful!

HATERS OUT IN FULL FORCE? Check.

Theres been one practice and the sky is already falling apparently... because of reports that new recruits actually LOOK GOOD. UNREAL!

This post was edited on 3/31 12:03 AM by jay_hq
 
I would agree with Rutgersdave that we should always pay attention when players leave the program. They are a good way to see what is really going on within a program and get some inside information. From what I have been hearing though is when players leave they tend to thank Flood and his staff and say they appreciated the way things were handled and they wish Rutgers the best (Such as Kam Lott who wrote a very non-hostile letter to Rutgers because he wanted to return home). This is a good sign as it means the departure is mostly just based on the player looking to gain further playing time or because of family issues.

I do think we should really judge FLOOD based on the next 3 recruiting classes mainly because any coach being a first time D1 head coach will need to perfect his "recruiting style." And this is doubly so when coaching at Rutgers because at other schools you are just recruiting kids who can play football and you don't have to worry about academics as much. At Rutgers we only can accept the CREAM OF THE CROP who are good enough to compete and win a BIG10 championship AND who are smart enough/hard working enough to obtain the 33rd best degree IN THE WORLD according to Center for World University Rankings!

A[/B]nd honestly between what I see developing for this next recruiting class I would say Flood is RIGHT ON SCHEDULE to recruiting at the level we need to start winning championships. Almost all of the big time recruits in NJ not only have visited and been on campus, but they have said that they are very high on campus. Additionally, we have big time players from PA, FL, MD, CT, IL, GA etc all committing too or seriously looking at Rutgers which is exactly what we would expect after showing that we belong in the BIG10 and our fan base his truly HURTING for a Championship!
 
You are saying judge him on the 2016, 2017 and 2018 recruiting class, "the next three recruiting classes". I think the fans will be judging him very year but I also believe Flood is here till 2020, 5 years, no matter how the team performs.
 
Yup I am saying 2015, 2016, and 2017 recruiting classes are the classes I think we should really judge Flood on.

- He is officially in the BIG10 and has shown we can win, so that excuse is no longer applicable.
- He has had enough time to develop and establish his "recruiting reputation" (which I have said many times I ABSOLUTELY LOVE because he is now known as extremely honest and straight forward and many recruits have pointed to that as a big plus and reason why they are thinking of coming to Rutgers because they know they can trust him)
- He has been here for a while and also has a contract for 5 more years or whatever so other coaches can no longer use that against him.

And obviously the biggest reason is that THIS coming recruiting class is possibly the most talented NJ class of football players to come out in a long time and if Flood can do his thing he can literally assemble a recruiting class THAT WILL GO DOWN IN RUTGERS HISTORY. Additionally, in 2016 and 2017 Flood has already established relationships with some very special players and they could come in and be the classes that can make the difference between getting to a BIG10 Championship and WINNING the BIG10 Championship.

So yeah the next 3 classes are huge for Flood so hopefully he comes through for the fan base who are literally ACHING for big time recruiting classes!
 
Originally posted by rutgersdave:
I see 6 players recruited from 2013 that have seen the field out of 22 recruits and maybe 1-2 starters. A lot of them left the program already.
Show your work please
 
Originally posted by rutgersdave:
Haters? You don't see a problem?
I see people ignoring the fact that some of these freshman are only immediately hitting the two deep roster because veterans who will play ahead of them are not listed on the spring roster because they are being held out due to injuries.
 
Originally posted by rutgersdave:
I see 6 players recruited from 2013 that have seen the field out of 22 recruits and maybe 1-2 starters. A lot of them left the program already. From 2011 recruiting class there were about 11 that were starters or were significant contributors. From the 2012 class there were about 12 starters or significant contributors. 2013 recruiting class was not deep enough since half the class should be contributing on the field. Looking at the 2014 class, many of them have left the program already.


That is a problem when you have a few good players but you need about 11-12 good players recruited each year. You can not field a team with only 6-7 good players every year. You need at least 11 good players a year.


This post was edited on 3/30 11:59 PM by rutgersdave
So ... 2013 players. Statement: "6 have seen the field, and 1-2 are starters." Forgetting that those players were either redshirt Frosh or true Soph in the just completed 2014 season. Here is the ACTUAL count:

Played: Barnwell, Cioffi, Goodwin, Grant, Joseph, Laviano, Liston (now gone), Patton, Deion Stephenson (DB) - originally in 2012 class but went prep, Tsimis, Turay ... by my count 11 players from this class have already played ... not 6.

Starters (likely): Barnwell, Patton, Stephenson, Turay ... 4, not 1-2.

Other Contributors Likely: Dorian Miller, Waife (though I see him also listed on the 2014 list - not sure which is right), Arcidiacono, Nash, TJ Taylor ... another 5 players.


Now let's look at 2014, who were true Frosh LAST season:

Already Played: Boggs, Hicks, Martin, Lucy ... who am I missing, as I thought 6 played?

Possible Additional 2015 Contributors (some on special teams): Applefield (though more likely in 2016), Cole, Hampton, Russell, Waife (or was he really 2013?), Wilkins, Wharton.

That is a total of 11 from the 2014 class ... with several others as longer term developers, like Heeman and Webb ... and this was the class that fell apart ... not so bad considering. Applefield, Cole, Heeman, Wilkins and Waife could all end up starters at some point, as could Boggs ( a sometimes starter as a Frosh), Hicks OR Martin. True, fewer than many classes, but we KNOW this class was full of fill-ins after so many decommits.


Perspective ... Class of 2012:


Already Started: Caroo, Hamilton, Longa, C. Muller, Peele (though won't be one of the starting 2 WR this coming year), Peoples (though only due to injuries), Federico ... only 7), though this was supposed to be such a good class, eh? And this class were all true Juniors and redshirt Sophs last year.

Possible Additional Starters in 2015: Denman, JPO (though he looks like he will back-up at DT rather than start at DE).

Other Possible Contributors: Brodie, Nelson, Davon Jacobs, Lambert, Agudosi.

For Perspective ... Class of 2011: 9 Starters (Aiken - only started 1 year, Gause - still here, Kaleb Johnson, Kirksey, Kroft, Lumpkin - still here, Mera - still here, Nova, Snyder).


Summary:[/B]

RutgersDave Statements: 2012- 12 Starters or Significant Contributors; 2013 - 1-2 Starters, 6 Contributors; 2014 - Many have left the program. Plus 2011 had 11 starters.

2011:[/B] 9 starters overall ... Likely or Possible 2015 Starters = 3

2012:[/B] Likely or Possible 2015 Starters = 6; Additional Most Likely Contributors = 5 (not Nelson or Brodie yet)

2013: Likely or Possible 2015 Starters = 4; Additional Most Likely Contributors = 8 (not including Waife or Goodwin - not sure where Goodwin plays)

2014: Likely or Possible 2015 Starters = 4 (Hicks or Martin, Boggs, Wilkins, Cole); Additional Most Likely Contributors = 4


But, please, do not let actual facts get in the way of uninformed opinions and statements.
 
Part of the reason I posted this thread is that it is crazy to get worked up over the two deep on the first day of practice and part because I have seen a few find the opportunity to bash Flood based on it. Lol for what ever the reason.

His recruiting classes have done about what I would expect on a yearly basis. And that shows that he either did find the gems or he just develops them very well.

And please stop with the offer lists. Not a single one of you that bash their reported offers have any clue how it works.
 
I don't care about offer lists. I expect the staff to go get the kids they believe are the best. I'm only focused on the results. The reality is that we have missed on many of our Plan A kids. I think he has done very good job identifying the Plan B kids (mods have talked about this). I see more guys on the roster that have a chance to see the field. While I don't see us beating the better teams, I think it helps us in beating similarly talented teams when we have some starters dinged up.

If Flood can go out and get 2 stellar classes in 16 and 17, I think he will have an EXCELLENT team. Quality veterans and young studs. That is a winning combo in my opinion. Look at a guy like Glashen. I thought we got 1 very good year from him, which I think is a win. In 2013, we had young guys on the field who had no business being on the field, but they were because there was no one else. That wasn't fair to the kids.

If Flood can knock it out of the park in 16 and 17, he is going to have a very long career at RU. If he doesn't, it could go either way. I hope he succeeds.
 
And only 5 Schiano players still playing. Oh don't look at the facts that will destroy your view of the real world
 
jellyman: Love the read and would entirely agree with what you stated...For whatever reasons some of our "fans" fail to really evaluate or know what is going on ...Yes we did not get all the recruits in the last 3 classes but Flood has come a looooooong way...I will admit this is the year we need more than 1 or 2 of the top NJ 20...give me 8-9 plus those great guys from out of state and I'll be happy...rutgersdave seems to dwell on the negatives...I do appreciate his concerns but he should really research before he posts.
 
Originally posted by vandalen1:
There are a number of guys on the 2 deep because vets will not be practicing this spring.
It's spring, folks.

A lot of the vets are not going to be practicing to heal up from injuries/surgery/what-have-you, and it's the opportunity for the coaching staff to really see what the younger guys can do.

Two deeps in the spring aren't really that useful, other than to give a sense of who the coaches have their eye on. Spring ball gives guys reps and chances to get attention from the staff, and gives coaches (and to a lesser extent, fans) the opportunity to see which players might crack the actual two deep that comes out at the end of the summer.

Hopefully one QB will shine enough to capture the starting job by the end of the spring, but there's no guarantee of that. I'm pretty confident we won't know our starting OLine by the end of spring, either.

If anything, this spring will give a sense of where our depth is right now.
 
Divisive OP is divisive.

So are those creating whatever posts his OP was in response to.

It's 1 day into spring practice. Take some deep breaths, dust off your golf clubs, and enjoy the sight of grass again.
 
Originally posted by bobaloo000:
Nice work Jellyman.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Rettig is also now a member of the '13 class and he or Laviano will likely start adding to the total. But yes, nice work Jellyman.
 
Originally posted by winfield102:
I don't care about offer lists. I expect the staff to go get the kids they believe are the best. I'm only focused on the results. The reality is that we have missed on many of our Plan A kids. I think he has done very good job identifying the Plan B kids (mods have talked about this). I see more guys on the roster that have a chance to see the field. While I don't see us beating the better teams, I think it helps us in beating similarly talented teams when we have some starters dinged up.

If Flood can go out and get 2 stellar classes in 16 and 17, I think he will have an EXCELLENT team. Quality veterans and young studs. That is a winning combo in my opinion. Look at a guy like Glashen. I thought we got 1 very good year from him, which I think is a win. In 2013, we had young guys on the field who had no business being on the field, but they were because there was no one else. That wasn't fair to the kids.

If Flood can knock it out of the park in 16 and 17, he is going to have a very long career at RU. If he doesn't, it could go either way. I hope he succeeds.
Winfield- agree with everything you said. The caveat being that there were so many reasons for the 14/15 classes being what they were. But he has shown that he got kids that will not be the doom of the program for the next 10 years like many thought. They may not be NC or B1G champs on their own but with a couple of good classes, these early Flood classes will create a very strong foundation of depth.
 
Maybe we deserve our mediocrity the last three years since so many of our posters, such as on this thread, see that mediocrity and either (i) do not recognize it as such, (ii) seem to think mediocrity eventually morphs into quality without a catalyst of some kind merely by ignoring the facts or wishing them away or (iii) seem to think it's OK to be mediocre right now because in the next 5 years our coach will become a better recruiter and be a better game coach. Wow, just wow.
 
Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Maybe we deserve our mediocrity the last three years since so many of our posters, such as on this thread, see that mediocrity and either (i) do not recognize it as such, (ii) seem to think mediocrity eventually morphs into quality without a catalyst of some kind merely by ignoring the facts or wishing them away or (iii) seem to think it's OK to be mediocre right now because in the next 5 years our coach will become a better recruiter and be a better game coach. Wow, just wow.
Any Rutgers fan who refers to last season's 8-5 record as mediocre is just plain STUPID.
 
Originally posted by CuredbywinningRU:
Maybe we deserve our mediocrity the last three years since so many of our posters, such as on this thread, see that mediocrity and either (i) do not recognize it as such, (ii) seem to think mediocrity eventually morphs into quality without a catalyst of some kind merely by ignoring the facts or wishing them away or (iii) seem to think it's OK to be mediocre right now because in the next 5 years our coach will become a better recruiter and be a better game coach. Wow, just wow.
9-4 and our first ever share of the conference.
6-7 very mediocre
8-5 in our first year in the B1G when most had us winning 4-5 games at best and destroyed NC in the bowl game

This year recruiting has started with Pollock, Jabbie, Field and Krimin.

I fail to see what you are talking about...And the funniest thing about it is...if we were looking for a coach and we had the opportunity to hire a P5 HC with that resume, I bet you would be creaming in your pants.

My expectations are for him to do better but what he has done up to this point, exceeds expectations.
 
There are threads that scream Jellyman. This one was absolutely howling for our very own Mr Metric and he represented himself as he always does.. With the facts..
 
Mild, Game set match.. You........
laugh.r191677.gif
 
You have to see how his players perform on the field. Last year, many predicted disaster and it wasn't the case at all. I really don't think the football situation would be any different if Schiano didn't leave. Some people seem to think RU should be on an even playing field with most of the top teams in the B1G...which is ridiculous. I think some of Flood's young recruits look very promising. The two young RBs (Hicks and Martin) I believe are the most promising RBs since Leonard and Rice. Turay is the best DL prospect that RU has recruited in many years...I don't remember a better potential player. You look at some of these 2 and 3 star guys...Boggs, Goodwin, Grant, They are very athletic. Things haven't been good in NJ for a variety of reasons and that looks to be changing tor the better. It doesn't mean they didn't grab some potentially very good players from Fla, PA, NY, etc. over the last 2 or 3 years.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT