I cringe when Doorson is in the game. We have 4 offensive players then. So stiff around the boards. Carter and Myles are much better rebounders to me, and way better offensively.
Every player has a role. Pike is no dummy. Doorson is a big body and a solid rebounderCan’t understand it myself. I get it that he’s a good guy and easy to root for but Carter and Johnson are much better options to me...and they will be back next year.
Can’t understand it myself. I get it that he’s a good guy and easy to root for but Carter and Johnson are much better options to me...and they will be back next year.
Maybe on the defensive end for now. The Neb game he took 8 shots and looked to be a breakout game for him. The other three games or even the last two, he took 5 shots total and has more PF than points. Check out his pts per mins played, not productive, but neither are the other big guys. I hope he can develop a shot.Johnson has a tough game against Indiana but I have seen enough to believe he can be a really good center for us. Watch the last five minutes of the Nebraska Game as an example
Maybe on the defensive end for now. The Neb game he took 8 shots and looked to be a breakout game for him. The other three games or even the last two, he took 5 shots total and has more PF than points. Check out his pts per mins played, not productive, but neither are the other big guys. I hope he can develop a shot.
Maybe on the defensive end for now. The Neb game he took 8 shots and looked to be a breakout game for him. The other three games or even the last two, he took 5 shots total and has more PF than points. Check out his pts per mins played, not productive, but neither are the other big guys. I hope he can develop a shot.
I don’t see him leaving personally. Can’t rush bigs along.
I think our bigs are better than your description and tough.
Is Luke physical enough?
Pike's philosophy is rebounding and defense - need glass eaters. Looks like Doucore and Nathan are being saved for next year.
Hope he stays and develops. The tools are there (size, agility, strength, shooting ability), and we need bigs. What you see in a 6-9 big man's freshman year is NOT what you will see in his third, fourth or fifth years. Patience is always a virtue, but moreso with PF/C guys in college basketball.
Just imagine where we would be this year without Doorson, who is providing leadership, rebounding, and good defense.
With 3 years left, he has potential to be a serviceable rotation big man in the future. I doubt seriously that he lives up to his 4 star billing, however. It's fine if he stays and it's fine if he goes.
Are “big” men in basketball the equivalent of OL where it takes some time to get them going and ready?I’m sure if he was made a free agent tomorrow the majority of our conference would find a ship for him in a heartbeat. He’s going to be a problem in this league as early as next year.
Are “big” men in basketball the equivalent of OL where it takes some time to get them going and ready?
Maybe I'm naive, but how can he get a medical redshirt if he isn't hurt? Doesn't the school have to produce evidence of the injury?
Because part of building a program is playing and respecting your seniors. It shows recruits that you care about them as well. And Doorson hasn't been awful, he's been really good defensively against some of the other big guys in the Big Ten too.
We can keep throwing players under the bus every 8 seconds.
Practice player.Don't know that much about him from HS, but can't believe he wouldn't be able to contribute what our bigs do now. We need someone who can score maybe 6-10 points around the basket by shooting. None of the rotation indicates they have that ability from what I've seen. Can't even make a contested layup or draw the foul.
Right now all our centers play the same type game.
His value is he can lean on opposing big men, an asset in the Big 10.Every player has a role. Pike is no dummy. Doorson is a big body and a solid rebounder
This is a case of misleading stats. Not disputing the percentages, but given our shooting woes, these guys should be taking a lot more shots. Let them take 10 shots each and see if they can make 5 or 6.Field goal percentages:
Carter: 64%
Doorson: 60%
Johnson: 52%
Doorson has a good 3 inches in height over Carter. Not difficult to see why he plays.
Agree. In fact I'd go so far as to say that he's improved more this year compared to last than any other player , including Eugene. In addition, by all accounts he's a very fine ambassador for the program. When you talk about building the right culture for your program , you think of guys like Eugene and Shaq.Because part of building a program is playing and respecting your seniors. It shows recruits that you care about them as well. And Doorson hasn't been awful, he's been really good defensively against some of the other big guys in the Big Ten too.
We can keep throwing players under the bus every 8 seconds.
Perhaps the reason Doorson starts is to give Johnson a feel for the game while not picking up fouls in the process. Pikell has always emphasized that picking a starting five is not important to him.I cringe when Doorson is in the game. We have 4 offensive players then. So stiff around the boards. Carter and Myles are much better rebounders to me, and way better offensively.