The problems with freeman are
Being overstated. True but over stated
The big problem is he isn’t being consistent in output...his highs have been much higher than last year ...but his lows have been much lower too than last year....and you need much make consistency from your senior captain......
For this team to have had a chance at a big record move this year...it requires seniorits with consistency from the seniors....and while they have been very good in some big wins, the lows have hurt us badly when they happened too
So you think this team would be better with or without freeman in 2018-2019?
Who are you replacing him with?This deserves its own thread he is just brutally bad. He is hurting us way more than helping us. Has zero basketball iq!!!
For the rest of the year I would start Eugene and bring Freeman off the bench. I'd also start Shaq and rotate in Duke and Sa every 4/5 minutes.Who would you replace him with this year?
Freeman's made some huge contributions while he's been here. Came in during maybe the worst (maybe) period of Rutgers basketball we've seen and made a huge impact. He's had some really bad games (I forget which game it was last year, I think Miami, but that might have been worse than last night) but I wouldn't be so quick to call him out due to all of the good he's done for the program. We might upgrade at some point in terms of consistent output and/or ceiling against bigger players but he's really been a warrior and I'm glad he's on our side.
id personally give eugene more minutes than freeman, he's earned it.Right, next year Shaq will be stepping into his position. But this year, there isn't anyone who can replace him and play at the same level.
please namegood question. I had this long discussion with my buddy before the Wisconsin game last week.
I don't know as I think it will come down to how the other pieces play off one another. If Shaq is able to make us forget about Freeman, then yes. But if Shaq also needs to play some of Sa's role, then I think we have a bit of a hole.
I think we have a tendency to think of only the bad things a departing player does, and not enough of the good things. there is no question, that DF does more good than bad. That wasn't the case last night. But there have been numerous games that Freeman is a major factor in our W. I don't know a lot about Carter other than what I have read which is that he should help a lot. If Carter can play more "in the system" then maybe we'll be better. But it's hard to say.
Put it this way, I am not doing handstands that he's graduating (like many in this thread, which I don't understand at all).
please name
A real 4 man like shaq carter
I truly can't believe that you're being serious when arguing that freeman is helping this team haha. I just can't. Being named a captain doesn't make you one of the best players or an asset to the team winning games, see dadika. I'm sorry but freeman doing well against coppin state isn't that exciting to mesorry, please name what?
should I link his stats?
have you listened to any of the post game pressers where Pikiell talks about what he brings to the team? the games where his defense leads to offense (hint...watch the Wisconsin game).
or how about the article where he is named team captain?
or how about our OOC wins which have brought us much needed respectability the past 2 years...do we get there without Freeman? NFW.
just stop with this nonsense. you're embarrassing yourself.
Freeman is not perfect. But to suggest he's a net-negative is exactly why it's hard to take you seriously when you get on your drum-banging tirades.
My opinion:
Freeman is making mistakes that hurt the team, but I feel those mistakes are because he's trying to do more than his talent calls for.
He's stepping up , but doesn't have the skill set to do some of the things he's trying to do.
On a bad shooting team, a player who is a leader, like Freeman , tries to do to much if he thinks it's needed
I'm normally OK with Freeman but he was God awful last night, maybe even worse than that - and yeah, his shooting percentage is better than Corey, Geo and Williams, but most of his shots are only from three feet. His percentage should be better. I don't know if you were at the game last night, but he almost took us out of the game by himself.Dear Lord com'on now. He's averaging 12 pts, 8 rebounds, and a block per game. Also has a better shooting % than Corey, Geo, Williams, He plays a very important role out there - with this group, right now - like it or not. Yes he can be frustrating at times, but these comments are uncalled for IMHO.
Also has a better shooting % than Corey, Geo, Williams
You geniusis that want to sit him. Are you somehow a better coach than coach P now?
I am fine with his taking 3 point shot
Not OK with effort on D end
Definitely not OK with his decisions with the ball in the low post.
.167? That would make him close to our Steph Curry.Why are you fine with his taking 3 pointers? He's a career .238 3P shooter, and is shooting just .167 this year. And despite all that, he's shooting them more often.
He's shot 50% more threes this year than he did all of last year, and has made just 4 vs. last year's 6. He shouldn't be taking this shot unless it's very late in the shot clock and there are no other options.
.167? That would make him close to our Steph Curry.
(Don't really see the need for a whole thread dedicated to rather nasty attacks on one of our players. Thought this sort of thing wasn't supposed to happen on the board.)
Don't mind criticism. But some comments are personal and uncalled for. There is a board policy on attacks against players. Again, criticism is OK, nasty attacks are not.This board has always dissected player performances. Sanders has gotten much more than his fair share over the last couple of years, and the microscope was definitely going to swing toward Freeman after his performance in the OSU game.
He's still one of our best players, and will still see 25+ minutes per game the rest of the way - and will certainly bounce back to turn in more strong performances. That doesn't mean he's immune to criticism, though. Or that he should have a green light to shoot threes, imo.
Freeman was a coveted JuCo recruit with offers from Tennessee and Arizona State among others. He is missing easy shots, forces too much and does not pass the ball often enough. He has about a dozen games to turn those things around before he moves on front Rutgers. He clearly wants to carve out a pro career for himself, but like many Rutgers seniors before him I think he is wilting a bit under the pressure he's placed on himself.I think Freeman is averaging around 25 minutes a game and Omoruyi slightly under that at the PF spot .
Freeman shouldn’t be considered a top recruit but the bridge needed ( at the time he was recruited) to help the roster be more competitive as better talent was recruited.
Under Jordan that wasn’t possible, but I think many of us are expecting more out of Freeman, under Pike, than we can expect from someone recruited to fill a need by Jordan , but really doesn’t have the type of talent to excel on a constant bases.
Deshawn on a better team wouldn’t be expected to do what RU fans expect them to, but with the lack of talent Rutgers has on the roster now compared to it’s B1G opponents, our frustrations are being taken out on him and that’s not right ( in my opinion)
Anyone thinking we would be better without him is knows zilch about bball or this team. Also I hate when people constantly hype up high schoolers every year that haven't stepped foot on a college campus and say they're better than current players. Saying we would be better off with Shaq Carter vs. Freeman is laughable.
??
I thought Carter was a JUCO?
???
Couldnt disagree with you more and agree with OP more. Were gonna be so much better without freeman. Points and rebs do not tell the story. Just watch the game
Eugene is a possibility but he's even smaller size-wise than Freeman and plays less physical basketball. You're also losing him at the 3 at that point where I think he's more valuable.
I still want a legit 4* PG to replace Corey (I believe this will be his last year at RU). Anyone know who we are looking at as possible juco PGs?We're gonna be "so much better" because the team is going to have more talent on the roster, to begin with, and the kids are all going to have another year of experience under their belts. I completely agree.
For the rest of the year I would start Eugene and bring Freeman off the bench. I
This is the tricky one. I kind of alluded to this issue before.
Not his black or white because the issue is gray....
Pikiell has 2 choices.
1. Crackdown on Freeman. Tell him no 3 pointers. Be upset when he doesn't pass out of a double or triple team. Get on him when he has possessions where he doesn't compete defensively. Yank his starting job when appropriate
2. Let Freeman be Freeman. Occassionaly sit him when necessary. Treat him like a senior captain and give him rope.
Problem with Option 1 is you run the risk of losing him. I am not certain if he hasn't lost Freeman already.
1. Crackdown on Freeman. Tell him no 3 pointers. Be upset when he doesn't pass out of a double or triple team.