ADVERTISEMENT

Get over yourselves Rutgers "fans"

Btw, if you have emailed me, I can no longer be reached at that address.
 
They are. I cashed out and am starting a new firm. They are definitely reading them.
 
The Yankees are a private franchise.

Call me when

1) The Yankees coach is involved in breaking multiple rules and admits breaking them in writing

2) 7 Yankees are arrested for violent crimes

3) The Yankees lose to one of the worst teams in all of baseball

In a span of 2 weeks. Or any college or pro team.
 
The Yankees are a private franchise.

Call me when

1) The Yankees coach is involved in breaking multiple rules and admits breaking them in writing

2) 7 Yankees are arrested for violent crimes

3) The Yankees lose to one of the worst teams in all of baseball

In a span of 2 weeks. Or any college or pro team.


No offense, but I wasn't interested in your opinion.
 
I agree with most of what's being said here but here is my take on the matter. Was it possible to handle Coach Floods punishment in a different manner? Why is everything so severe and final. In other words why didn't the AD and President administer punishment but in a more quiet and discrete manner. I have no qualms with him getting punished for what he did, it was clearly wrong. But this open in your face decision made Barchi and Hermann look like they're pandering to RU1000 and the Star-Ledger. When is the University going to look at both in the face and say we'll handle disciplinary measures the way we see fit!! I coined a phrase several years ago that did not sit well with some "A tale of two fanbases, I agree he should have been punished I just don't think it should have been advertised. JMHO
 
Last edited:
I agree with most of what's being said here but here is my take on the matter. Was it possible to handle Coach Floods punishment in a different manner? Why is everything so severe and final. In other words why didn't the AD and President administer punishment but in a more quiet and discrete manner. I have no qualms with him getting punished for what he did, it was clearly wrong. But this open in your face decision made Barchi and Hermann look like they're pandering to RU1000 and the Star-Ledger. When is the University going to look at both in the face and say we'll handle disciplinary measures the way we see fit!! I coined a phrase several years ago that did not sit well with some "A tale of two fanbases". Rutgers football has two fanbases. JMHO

It isn't the Rutgers way. Most schools would do so much more discreetly as to not be the butt of jokes across the country.

Rutgers likes to do it the other way.
 
It is insane that Rutgers has now been punished more for 1 email and one face to face meeting than North Carolina has for having literal fake classes for decades in order to keep student athletes eligible.

RUTGERS has not been punished at all. The NCAA hasn't said a word. This is all internal. So this "point" is pointless.
 
I wish this "urban legend" that Lizzy Seeberg was raped by Prince Shembo would go away. She was not raped. She claimed in the police report that he touched her breast while they were making out and a couple of days later reported it to the school. This was why the alleged offence was sexual assault and not rape. This was a girl who had been on medication since High School for depression and had twice attempted suicide previously.

Didn't prince Shembo also throw someone through a plate glass window?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT