everyone at an academy is there on schlarship. How do they determine who are the 85 "scholarship" athletes? Just curious.
everyone at an academy is there on schlarship. How do they determine who are the 85 "scholarship" athletes? Just curious.
everyone at an academy is there on schlarship. How do they determine who are the 85 "scholarship" athletes? Just curious.
I don't believe they have any students on athletic scholarships. Everyone is on a military scholarship. So although the NCAA allows them to provide 85 athletic scholarships, they don't have to provide all 85, and they provide 0.
So they can have an unlimited number of players?
So they can have an unlimited number of players?
So they can have an unlimited number of players?
In reality, it is more like 8 years. My sister was recruited by all three academies. She even took an official to one of them. They were honest about the active duty service and said it was often 8 years. The mandatory was 5 years plus 3 in reserves but admitted it was likely to serve during the three.An unlimited number of players who must complete 5 years of active duty after they graduate.
And yes, since they do not give "scholarships", they could have 300 guys on the team.
Navy has 180 players.No, they can't. D1 basketball and football are "headcount limited" by NCAA rule. The service academies are de facto exempt from scholarship limitations simply because, as has been pointed out, all students are technically on scholarship.
What is football limit? 105?
In reality, it is more like 8 years. My sister was recruited by all three academies. She even took an official to one of them. They were honest about the active duty service and said it was often 8 years. The mandatory was 5 years plus 3 in reserves but admitted it was likely to serve during the three.
And yes, since they do not give "scholarships", they could have 300 guys on the team.
No, they can't. D1 basketball and football are "headcount limited" by NCAA rule. The service academies are de facto exempt from scholarship limitations simply because, as has been pointed out, all students are technically on scholarship.
You don't think it would completely undermine all of college football if the three teams that have their own set of rules were the top three every single year?I don't think different rules are a bad thing for them. If Navy, Air Force, Army were ranked 1,2,3 every year I'd like it.
Why? I'm all for supporting the troops, but I think if college football ever got to the point where you knew the academies were going to be the top three year after year, they would have to take a look at the differences in rules otherwise why bother with any national rankings and out of conference games?It might, but I think it is good for America to have super good football teams at the academies.
I think the service academies require cadets to participate in some kind of "gym class" and football fills that requirement.Army roster has 145 players on it. Navy has 180 players.
You don't think it would completely undermine all of college football if the three teams that have their own set of rules were the top three every single year?
That is correct even though some of the activities are things like floor hockey, submission gappling, ultimate frisbee and functional fitness.As I understand it...EVERYone at the academies have to compete in a sport....even if its just "inter mural"
Obviously, we are talking about a hypothetical scenario here where that apparently isn't enough of a deterrent.I think 5 years of mandatory service pretty much deals with that possibility.
Like Notre Dame and Ohio State don't have their own 'set of rules'???You don't think it would completely undermine all of college football if the three teams that have their own set of rules were the top three every single year?
Notre Dame does, and I agree that it is stupid.Like Notre Dame and Ohio State don't have their own 'set of rules'???
Anyone saying the rules should change if the academies were 1,2,3 must not know they only get 4 years. That means no redshirts. Also any serious NFL prospect isn't going to an academy. Also everyone on the roster is subject to the same physical requirements all students are required to complete. A 6'6" 325lb lineman just won't exist at one of the academies.
If they were the top three teams EVERY SINGLE YEAR as Caliknight said, you don't think that would raise some questions about the difference in rules? Obviously that is immensely unlikely to occur because of the active duty requirement, but if that were to occur, I think people would have to start wondering if the difference in rules needs to be addressed.Anyone saying the rules should change if the academies were 1,2,3 must not know they only get 4 years. That means no redshirts. Also any serious NFL prospect isn't going to an academy. Also everyone on the roster is subject to the same physical requirements all students are required to complete. A 6'6" 325lb lineman just won't exist at one of the academies.