Sometimes you need to actually put the perspective of what RU looked like just a few short months ago, to where they're going to be a few months from now.
It's hard to imagine that in probably half of our games last year, RU started 4 out of 5 players that have no chance or would have had no chance at being starters by this November.
It's minutes played, shot distribution, freshman not yet ready for college basketball at this level and a learning curve.
Here are some boxscores of ugly, difficult, hard to imagine having upside to this roster games, to what we have to work hard this summer and fall, to see significantly better players, upside, talent and more development.
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082593
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082595
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082596
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082597
It's not impossible to think that our 5 starters from more 12 or 15 games, could only see 1 starter starting in this year's November and December games.
You have to look at the boxscores, the minutes that were played and how far the freshman have progressed from these boxes, to the end of this past year and into next year.
And that's not even factoring in Paul Mulcahy, Jacob Young and Yeboah....all three players I could very easily argue could have started or certainly competed for minutes on RU starting line up last November or December.
So, why post the box scores??
It's important to post them because there was a clear ceiling of upside to the starting lineups and it shows in the box scores. Struggle vs Miami, struggle with Boston University, very uneven boxscore vs Wisconsin.....and the 1st test vs St John's, wasn't even a representative of the lineup we finished the season with.
If we changed 60% of the minutes played and distributed during the season last year, it's very easy to replace another 20% of the minutes from last November and December with Eugene departing.
I don't think Eugene is a terrible player, just a player that was part of the rebuild but not a huge factor in what brought this roster forward from November/December to January and February.
There are going to be playing time battles and more transition as the program moves up in the standings. It's probably best to prepare for the changes and see it develop, vs looking back, as if November and December was some sort of timeframe of play, we are going to miss going forward.
It's hard to imagine that in probably half of our games last year, RU started 4 out of 5 players that have no chance or would have had no chance at being starters by this November.
It's minutes played, shot distribution, freshman not yet ready for college basketball at this level and a learning curve.
Here are some boxscores of ugly, difficult, hard to imagine having upside to this roster games, to what we have to work hard this summer and fall, to see significantly better players, upside, talent and more development.
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082593
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082595
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082596
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore?gameId=401082597
It's not impossible to think that our 5 starters from more 12 or 15 games, could only see 1 starter starting in this year's November and December games.
You have to look at the boxscores, the minutes that were played and how far the freshman have progressed from these boxes, to the end of this past year and into next year.
And that's not even factoring in Paul Mulcahy, Jacob Young and Yeboah....all three players I could very easily argue could have started or certainly competed for minutes on RU starting line up last November or December.
So, why post the box scores??
It's important to post them because there was a clear ceiling of upside to the starting lineups and it shows in the box scores. Struggle vs Miami, struggle with Boston University, very uneven boxscore vs Wisconsin.....and the 1st test vs St John's, wasn't even a representative of the lineup we finished the season with.
If we changed 60% of the minutes played and distributed during the season last year, it's very easy to replace another 20% of the minutes from last November and December with Eugene departing.
I don't think Eugene is a terrible player, just a player that was part of the rebuild but not a huge factor in what brought this roster forward from November/December to January and February.
There are going to be playing time battles and more transition as the program moves up in the standings. It's probably best to prepare for the changes and see it develop, vs looking back, as if November and December was some sort of timeframe of play, we are going to miss going forward.