Hummel blew it too

[Plum Street]

He was the analyst last night . I mean if you aren’t gonna point out what happened on the final play , what the hell are you there for ? He needs to make a statement on Twitter or somewhere. He was quiet for a long time after that shot. You can’t tell me he’s a budding star in this profession after last night. Robbie Hummel make a statement why you didn’t address this during the broadcast. IBilas and others had to bail you out.
Carino and fonseca need to get a statement from Hummel. It comes with the territory Robbie

 

[zappaa]

He was the analyst last night . I mean if you aren’t gonna point out what happened on the final play , what the hell are you there for ? He needs to make a statement on Twitter or somewhere. He was quiet for a long time after that shot. You can’t tell me he’s a budding star in this profession after last night. Robbie Hummel make a statement why you didn’t address this during the broadcast. IBilas and others had to bail you out.
Carino and fonseca need to get a statement from Hummel. It comes with the territory Robbie

Probably because he didn’t see it either

 

[Plum Street]

Probably because he didn’t see it either

Ok fine , if that’s the case he should say that . He owes an explanation

 

[zappaa]

Ok fine , if that’s the case he should say that .

Obviously he’s heard all about it and watched the replays by now.
I’m sure when he’s on the B1G show again he’ll say it shouldn’t have counted and was a horrible break for Rutgers.
Once again, the tragedy is it wasn’t reviewable due to no whistles.

 

[Plum Street]

Obviously he’s heard all about it and watched the replays by now.
I’m sure when he’s on the B1G show again he’ll say it shouldn’t have counted and was a horrible break for Rutgers.
Once again, the tragedy is it wasn’t reviewable due to no whistles.

A good game analyst gives good analysis during the game.

 

[zappaa]

A good game analyst gives good analysis during the game.

He didn’t see it, you can deem him no good if you like

 

[Plum Street]

He didn’t see it, you can deem him no good if you like

How do you know he didn’t see it ?

 

[zappaa]

How do you know he didn’t see it ?

Because that’s what I think.
He along with 3 refs didn’t see it.
According to Pike the passer went out of bounds before he passed the ball, if the ref saw it he would have blown the whistle

 

[ImBadRU]

Robbie Hummel. Who gives a sh**. He cares nothing for RU.

 

[zappaa]

Robbie Hummel. Who gives a sh**. He cares nothing for RU.

He’s very good to RU and it’s obvious
Very complementary of our program

 

[Plum Street]

Because that’s what I think.
He along with 3 refs didn’t see it.
According to Pike the passer went out of bounds before he passed the ball, if the ref saw it he would have blown the whistle

Ok. Hummel owes the viewers an explanation . If he didn’t see it , ok. That’s not asking too much.

 

[Plum Street]

He’s very good to RU and it’s obvious

He shouldn’t “be good” to anyone . Call it objectively and what you see . And if you don’t see something big own it.

 

[zappaa]

He shouldn’t “be good” to anyone . Call it objectively and what you see . And if you don’t see something big own it.

He’s allowed to like RU and does.
He does call it as he sees it imo..
I disagree he needs to make a statement.

 

[fluoxetine]

Hummel owes the viewers an explanation

Uh, why?

 

[Plum Street]

Uh, why?

Because he’s the game analyst and whiffed on the biggest play of the game . Ummmm why Robbie ?

 

[Plum Street]

He’s allowed to like RU and does.
He does call it as he sees it imo..
I disagree he needs to make a statement.

Lol. It took you like 5 posts to say that !!

 

[RUChoppin]

None of the OSU fans saw it either. It was a freak phenomenon, tens of thousands of people including Hummel and three refs all had a very long blink, all at the same time, during the most crucial moment of the game. Craziest thing.

 

[zappaa]

Lol. It took you like 5 posts to say that !!

What did I say?😊

 

[TommyGunn]

He was the analyst last night . I mean if you aren’t gonna point out what happened on the final play , what the hell are you there for ? He needs to make a statement on Twitter or somewhere. He was quiet for a long time after that shot. You can’t tell me he’s a budding star in this profession after last night. Robbie Hummel make a statement why you didn’t address this during the broadcast. IBilas and others had to bail you out.
Carino and fonseca need to get a statement from Hummel. It comes with the territory Robbie

We all need to let it go dude.

We lost. On the road. Again. End of story.

Time to move on.

 

[Plum Street]

We all need to let it go dude.

We lost. On the road. Again. End of story.

Time to move on.

Ok with the loss . But people need to own mistakes.

 

[jerseybird]

A good game analyst gives good analysis during the game.

The shot ended the game and then ESPN2 went on to the next game rather quickly. Robbie's job was done.

 

[Plum Street]

The shot ended the game and then ESPN2 went on to the next game rather quickly. Robbie's job was done.

Weak . There was a long time the announcers were quiet after the shot

 

[jerseybird]

Weak . There was a long time the announcers were quiet after the shot

Robbie is smart like Pike. They each know it is not their job to provide an assessment of the referees' performance. There are people who provide that service for the conference.

 

[fluoxetine]

Because he’s the game analyst and whiffed on the biggest play of the game . Ummmm why Robbie ?

He’s an announcer? Him not noticing some guy was out of bounds has no effect on anyone? This is such a bizarre take lol

 

[Plum Street]

He’s an announcer? Him not noticing some guy was out of bounds has no effect on anyone? This is such a bizarre take lol

Yes, the analyst should analyze the game winning shot . What a bizarre thought !!!

 

[rubaseball78]

Obviously he’s heard all about it and watched the replays by now.
I’m sure when he’s on the B1G show again he’ll say it shouldn’t have counted and was a horrible break for Rutgers.
Once again, the tragedy is it wasn’t reviewable due to no whistles.

Whistles have nothing to do with it. How often to buzzer shots get reviewed to see if it got off in time without a whistle.

 

[fluoxetine]

Yes, the analyst should analyze the game winning shot . What a bizarre thought !!!

No the bizarre thought is that an announcer needs to issue some kind of public apology for missing something.

 

[zappaa]

Whistles have nothing to do with it. How often to buzzer shots get reviewed to see if it got off in time without a whistle.

No whistles is why the out of bounds dilemma wasn’t reviewed.

 

[Plum Street]

No the bizarre thought is that an announcer needs to issue some kind of public apology for missing something.

Who said apology ? Just address why he didn’t analyze a controversial play . I am sure he’s on social media , it pretty easy to make a comment there . Lots of news media posting and talking about it . Why not the analyst that was there?

 

[jerseybird]

Yes, the analyst should analyze the game winning shot . What a bizarre thought !!!

Because if a last second shot goes in to win the game and there is no whistle, it is the ultimate mic drop!

 

[knight82]

Following this logic, John Sterling needs to make a statement after every Yankee game. He gets at least five things wrong every game.

 

[zappaa]

Mel Allen should have made a statement for not analyzing the fact Don Larson’s 3rd strike to Dale Mitchell in the 1956 World Series was a foot outside and low.
Just having fun Pium 😊

 

[knight82]

Mel Allen should have made a statement for not analyzing the fact Don Larson’s 3rd strike to Dale Mitchell in the 1956 World Series was a foot outside and low.
Just having fun Pium 😊

You would have a different name if Mitchell had gotten a hit

 

[bac2therac]

Ok. Hummel owes the viewers an explanation . If he didn’t see it , ok. That’s not asking too much.

No he doesn't

 

[zappaa]

You would have a different name if Mitchell had gotten a hit

Or walked

 

[GORU2014]

Because he’s the game analyst and whiffed on the biggest play of the game . Ummmm why Robbie ?

Can they even see his feet from that angle?

 

[FireBugOBJC]

Wow, this is laughable

 

[NiTeKnight]

Obviously he’s heard all about it and watched the replays by now.
I’m sure when he’s on the B1G show again he’ll say it shouldn’t have counted and was a horrible break for Rutgers.
Once again, the tragedy is it wasn’t reviewable due to no whistles.

They should change the rules so that it is re-viewable. Maybe "a coach can challenge one out of bounds violation in the last 30 seconds". The other team gets one free throw, if he loses the challenge. Call it the Rutgers rule. With the game on the line at the end, let's get it right.

 

[Scangg]

Hummel probably should have noticed it but not sure where his view is. The show cut away to the next game pretty quickly. Not mad at him.

 

[Plum Street]

Mel Allen should have made a statement for not analyzing the fact Don Larson’s 3rd strike to Dale Mitchell in the 1956 World Series was a foot outside and low.
Just having fun Pium 😊

Pitch looked good to me 😆