Maryland's has yet another top tier QB. They are eating Auburn for lunch. Granted they have some very good wide receivers.
Maryland has another one
- Thread starter Extra Point
- Start date
Auburn team that should’ve beaten Bama, but everyone thinks Bama is so dominant.
It’s amazing every team can find a good QB except for us.
If you watch the route designs of nearly all these other teams - you can see why they get easier completions and guys magically appear open. I don’t observe that much in RUs offense.
Auburn ran a bit of motion and misdirection in that game. Unless Michigan changes their MO, that’s not how they operate on offense.
They try to just run you over and while Alabama defense isn’t as good as past ones I think it’s good enough to not be bullied. There have been times like UF one year when Mullen was there and maybe another one or two but it’s not something you see often.
Maryland is as e inconsistant as you can get. Capable of beating one of the Big 10 East one day and losing to Temple the next week.
Having an QB that has accuracy issues in every game makes the Passing game worthless.
Route design while important is meaningless if the QB continues to overthrow Receivers.
I see Edwards is 6 for 17. Thats not good. Are you guys talking about the guy who is 3/3? Not watching the game, just checking stats while traveling.
These guys are not reminding me of the second coming of Taulia. Maryland is fortunate to be playing the Keystone Tigers. I can't imagine how Auburn could have and should have beat Alabama, but I can guarantee you it wasn't by playing like this.
Pretty sure we say that about shooters too in Basketball.🤷♂️
Maryland has been the beneficiary of some great bowl game draws in their favor. An awful, awful VA Tech and now a terrible Auburn team.
And yes, I know we got a great draw with a depleted Miami.
And yes, I know we got a great draw with a depleted Miami.
You are better than to respond to a baiting hater. Can someone explain why some are wetting their pants over MD QB play today? Billy Edwards is 6/18. Gavin is more accurate. The other guy is 4/6 with a pick. You guys would be crucifying our QB with those stats.
...something I found pretty interesting (recruiting class rankings):
...it's almost like coaching and program climate/culture matters, right? (@Virginiarufan this wasn't being directed 'at' you at all; I just thought it was contextual food for thought)
Joe P.
Rutgers wasn't at full strength itself
OUT
- Max Melton, CB
- Johnny Langan, TE
- Chris Long, WR
- Tyreem Powell, LB
- Aaron Young, RB
- Naseim Brantley, WR
- Tyler Needham, OL
- Joe De Croce, OL
- Ireland Brown, OL
As for new Turtle QBs, I think some posting about them might be in a panic mode over a few completions .
Honesty I'd prefer that to Always beats mediocre teams, Always loses to good teams. I just can't get excited over beating nothing but weaklings, year after year. Nothing memorable.
Yeah, neither has really looked that great, and are unlikely to challenge the portal guy.
I wonder if Billy Edwards will think about changing positions...
Yep. These guys aren't Taulia....although I do think RS freshman Cam Edge is going to a stud eventually.
If I recall correctly basically ABC/ESPN= SEC/ACC/ AAC
Fox= B1G/ BigXII/ Mountain West
Joe P.
I’m not concerned about the Maryland QB today but rather our own glaring QB issues.
If someone says we are not looking for a QB the obvious question is why not.
Shelby has no clue. He is a hater and a troll.
Can someone answer why this thread was started?
The insistence on trying to blame the WR is confounding. We’ve had WRs wide open. It’s the accuracy that is the issue. It hasn’t improved in two years. One nice run against BC and one against Indiana.
it’s both. WR can help a QB by getting more open. Watch the bowl game and you’ll see both.
What you said about the portal QB Maryland is getting not hacing much competition probably is true.
MJ Morris was pretty good for the Wolfpack as a backup, in 2023, for Brendan Armstrong who they got from the portal for 2023 and was Virginia's career passing leader.
Morris also backed up a good one in Devin Leary who left for Kentucky for the 2023 season after losing half the 2022 season to an injury letting Morris prove himself a capable replacement.
I think Maryland will miss Tagovailoa, but MJ Morris could prove a worthy successor.
I won't assume Rutgers will beat Maryland because Taulia's gone, just feel RU will be improved enough to win .
Shelby is the only ass on this board that I have on ignore. A pathetic loser most likely living in mommy's basement.
No one wants to hear it, especially from me, but Schiano is so invested developing his prized recruit for three years he’s unwilling to admit GW is a bust and move on. Some think the MN qb is already a commit (silent verbal) but no one has offered a legit reason for such secrecy. Besides, GS is a defense-minded, exceedingly risk averse coach and he’s satisfied with our one dimensional offense.
And Why would anyone come here to be penciled in as QB2 right off the bat ?
Hope I’m wrong, but with what we actually know don’t see evidence of a legit portal QB coming here. Schiano invited the displaced/recruited over Minn QB to try to snag him as a backup.
I’m not a ‘faith’ guy. I need to see it to believe it.
Last edited:
Was this post early in the game? Just wondering how 30% completion percentage is something to crow about. Other guy threw 6 passes and one pick 🤷♂️
The Maryland QB's finished the game
10/26
208 yds.
2 TD 1 Int.
15 carries
40 yds.
1 TD
That's a good day for Wimsatt, but not even close to the second coming of Taulia.
10/26
208 yds.
2 TD 1 Int.
15 carries
40 yds.
1 TD
That's a good day for Wimsatt, but not even close to the second coming of Taulia.
Yeah, it was early in the game.
I think it's less about the percentage than the type of throws the QBs were making early in the game.
Eventually the offense fizzled out due to drops/inaccuracy and some conservative playcalling.
Our fans have a way of cheering on early successes of other teams in games, only to see it work as a jinx and fizzle.
Exactly what I have said all year. Route and play designs have been a problem. Specifically in the red zone. Play design can cover for lack of atleticism.
In an age when 5-win teams can get into bowl games, lots of them are weaklings. 6 and 6 is mediocre. Even 7 and 5 is not especially great when you consider everyone gets to schedule 3 sure wins every year OOC. You can have a losing record in-conference, even in a weak division like the Big Ten West, and be 7 and 5.
Similar threads
