I guess Notre Dame probably won't be joining. It looks like good news is on the way for the ACC regarding their network.
If ESPN loses most or all of their B1G games, and moves a bunch of ACC games to an ACC network (after they have already moved some games to the SECN), what is going to carry the ESPNU channel, the Sun Belt conference?
As much as I agree with you, I doubt it would happen. ND is just a special case in college sports, especially football. They already rake money in with their own deals and I cannot see them even taking a one year stipulation on getting full shares. I also think the BIG would want them so much that they would accommodate them.
But, as much as it would probably be great for the BIG, I still HATE them!
You cannot make general statements about a complicated contract that is likely drafted in ND's favor as they were in the superior position when it was executed.
What is the consideration to ND that would make the conference restriction enforceable? ND did just have their hockey program join the B1G, so there are exceptions. Also, ND is not stupid. Even if the restrictions are enforceable there has to be some kind of out for ND.
Secondly I highly doubt the GOR covers football.
Nope. They'd place ND in the "easy" division with longtime local rivals Northwestern and Purdue. An ND vs Michigan or ND vs Ohio State big ten championship game would be a ratings wet dream for the big ten.
ND joins, and they'd need a partner, like UVA. It then makes sense to organize teams into pods. RU could be in a four team pod with MD, PSU, and UVA. Better than the situation we're in now.
They must have seen the ACC Network's internal revenue projections vs. BTN.
why? because its way too tough right now. Look at the other side and look at our side, its almost impossible situation when you have 4 of the top 5 Big 10 programs all on your side of the league and its not even close. Its not cyclical either.
Let's not be too condescending as Ill. vs RU or Indiana vs. RU is a par on wake and saraBrando's heavy back pedal tells me that ND is not locked into the ACC. ACC network is nothing but a new LHN to appease FSU and to some extent ND and Clemson. Can't wait to see it all blow back in ESPN's face when their top teams follow the money to the B1G and SEC. Wake Forest @ Cuse is a must see football game.
I don't know what they'd do with the divisions, but I feel very confident that Notre Dame does not want to be in the West and couldn't care less about where Northwestern is in the setup. In the last 20 years they've played Northwestern once.Nope. They'd place ND in the "easy" division with longtime local rivals Northwestern and Purdue. An ND vs Michigan or ND vs Ohio State big ten championship game would be a ratings wet dream for the big ten.
Well I guess that's the end of this thread. Not happening.
according to Sirius radio this am,the big 12 is forced to make an expansion to survive. texas will refuse to do so and has texas tech and tcu int their back pocket to block expansion. if this happens, the big 12 will implode. according to the experts, texas will go to the acc and nd will go with them. the acc would become super strong. espn is all in.
Let's not be too condescending as Ill. vs RU or Indiana vs. RU is a par on wake and sara
Who are "the experts" ? I just don't see this as being plausible. I could see Texas & OU in the Big Ten first.according to Sirius radio this am,the big 12 is forced to make an expansion to survive. texas will refuse to do so and has texas tech and tcu int their back pocket to block expansion. if this happens, the big 12 will implode. according to the experts, texas will go to the acc and nd will go with them. the acc would become super strong. espn is all in.
Why would TCU and Tech block expansion so they can blow up the conference and end up in the AAC instead of the Big 12?according to Sirius radio this am,the big 12 is forced to make an expansion to survive. texas will refuse to do so and has texas tech and tcu int their back pocket to block expansion. if this happens, the big 12 will implode. according to the experts, texas will go to the acc and nd will go with them. the acc would become super strong. espn is all in.
The GOR might cover an average of 2.5 games a year thanks to the 5 games a year deal they have with the ACC. But I kind of doubt it does. And realistically, a GOR that covers no football or maybe a dozen games over 5 years can be bought out "relatively cheaply." And Brando is kind of right in that if ND was to become a full member of a football league during that GOR they have to join the ACC. That being said there's always a dollar figure that can be reached on that. No one is forcing a school especially ND to join a conference they don't want to join. That said I just don't see ND joining a football league at any point soon.You cannot make general statements about a complicated contract that is likely drafted in ND's favor as they were in the superior position when it was executed.
What is the consideration to ND that would make the conference restriction enforceable? ND did just have their hockey program join the B1G, so there are exceptions. Also, ND is not stupid. Even if the restrictions are enforceable there has to be some kind of out for ND.
Secondly I highly doubt the GOR covers football.
We'll see, if it comes to that.Oklahoma has a problem in that they are not aau member. this leaves them out of the big 10 and the pac 12.
No it doesn't. The Pac-12 has several schools not in the AAU so that's not a factor there realistically. As for the Big Ten, yes AAU Is preferred and for a school like us an absolute requirement. For an athletics program like Oklahoma, the AAU checkbox amounts to about a 5 minute stumbling block in negotiations. For an athletics program like UConn, I think the AAU thing can even be overcome but it's clearly much more of an issue than say for Oklahoma. The bigger issue for an Oklahoma is whether they can come without Okie State. If we have to take Okie State, it's a no-go.Oklahoma has a problem in that they are not aau member. this leaves them out of the big 10 and the pac 12.
Perfectly said. As for Okie State, as long as they have a landing P5 landing spot, Oklahoma should be able to move without them. Do they have that? I don't know.No it doesn't. The Pac-12 has several schools not in the AAU so that's not a factor there realistically. As for the Big Ten, yes AAU Is preferred and for a school like us an absolute requirement. For an athletics program like Oklahoma, the AAU checkbox amounts to about a 5 minute stumbling block in negotiations. For an athletics program like UConn, I think the AAU thing can even be overcome but it's clearly much more of an issue than say for Oklahoma. The bigger issue for an Oklahoma is whether they can come without Okie State. If we have to take Okie State, it's a no-go.
IM Sure the B10 is plotting to land UVA as its first choice if this all blows up.. U. of Florida as second choice.Notre Dame..same old story...B10 should tell them get lost.Why would TCU and Tech block expansion so they can blow up the conference and end up in the AAC instead of the Big 12?
Who are "the experts" ? I just don't see this as being plausible. I could see Texas & OU in the Big Ten first.
IM Sure the B10 is plotting to land UVA as its first choice if this all blows up.. U. of Florida as second choice.
Capt Delany says..Eastward Ho!
---
Hate that idea
If the B1G walks ESPN is prepared to let them go.
If they walk, ESPN has no choice but to let them go. It won't be the end of ESPN for that to happen but you're a fool if you think they want to lose them.
It would not be the end for ESPN.
LOL
HAIL TO PITT!!!!