Hey OP... at some point you have to ask yourself why people are criticizing you. I have no skin in the game of who works for Rutgers in these matters and I can tell you that you are not advancing your position here.
In your OP you mentioned Phil Knight as an example.
Nike's world HQ is in Beaverton, Oregon and Phil Knight probably lives close by.. The sporting events at Oregon are probably the biggest things going on in that state on any given Saturday. Sports is Phil Knight's passion and his business. Oregon has its own major network television stations (NJ's are all in NY and PA). Oregon has been in a major conference for a long time.
Phil Knight recently donated $400M to Stanford. Ask yourself why.
And all that said, Oregon rise in donations did not begin until 1996 or so. Get out of your own head and
READ THIS.
Rutgers has many disadvantages compared to this example.
I think we can get there. While I am sure the fundraising staff can probably do better you have to stop blaming them and the famous RU Screw. If a huge Big Time donor is out there, it will happen on his or her own time for his or her own reasons. All Rutgers need do is be sure to show they can spend money wisely...
...but as I said above.. Rutgers has many disadvantages. Here are a couple:
- People flee New Jersey (immigrants and job-hoppers have kept the population roughly static, but many people leave the state).
- The local TV networks mostly cover happenings at the State U only when there is a fire or murder or a scandal.. the stuff Rutgers can be most proud of never makes the evening news.
- NJ is not the nicest place on earth. That is speed of life here and the competition has created a "Jersey Attitude" that filters into everything.. driving on roads, encounters with public servants and administrators... and the cost of doing business.. I think that is the origin of the Ru Screw. It is juts New Jersey people being "Jersey". And it is just a convenient excuse for those who do not want to donate. If the were truly motivated to donate for their own reasons then it wouldn't matter if some administrator gave them a hard time about changing their majors.
If some potential major donors out there want to build something at their State U then they will do so. I doubt very much that Rutgers employees have prevented this. But certainly the AD gaffs in recent years has not helped... but that has nothing to do with handling the donors/ticket-holders.