ADVERTISEMENT

OT: COVID Science - Pfizer/Moderna vaccines >90% effective; Regeneron antibody cocktail looks very promising in phase II/III trial and more

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah , I like our RIGHTS ( masks don’t offend me) what bothers me and millions is the threat of some of the over reach which is directly around the corner.
What governments around the world are asking is for people to wear masks and social distance for your health and the citizens around you. This isn’t a US right or left thing, or some reduction of your freedom. It’s science and practiced around the world. If we all band together for 2-3 months and just did this, we would all be in a better situation, including economically.

Be well.
 
What governments around the world are asking is for people to wear masks and social distance for your health and the citizens around you. This isn’t a US right or left thing, or some reduction of your freedom. It’s science and practiced around the world. If we all band together for 2-3 months and just did this, we would all be in a better situation, including economically.

Be well.
Nobody is questioning “the science”... It’s questioning the range of limitations being anticipated being placed upon the general public. Restricting travel now between states? There was a group of people who were ready to do battle over a supposed “ illegal” border wall. Are you serious ? We’re you in favor or opposed to a Border Wall to keep unwanted out. I’m opposed to possible “ intrastate “ restrictions ... not “ interstate “ restrictions. I’m for masks inside stores, businesses and when unable to distance from others... Notice “ socially distance” is a term no one should use. The same people who instituted the “ socially distancing “ term were and still are determined to allow everybody and their cousins to enter this country with no valid rights. Mask wearing is the least of our issues... When and if vaccines become available to the people is the bigger question.Like I posted last week ...Fall of 2021 maybe later... don’t buy the BS being filtered down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138
Nobody is questioning “the science”... It’s questioning the range of limitations being anticipated being placed upon the general public. Restricting travel now between states? There was a group of people who were ready to do battle over a supposed “ illegal” border wall. Are you serious ? We’re you in favor or opposed to a Border Wall to keep unwanted out. I’m opposed to possible “ intrastate “ restrictions ... not “ interstate “ restrictions. I’m for masks inside stores, businesses and when unable to distance from others... Notice “ socially distance” is a term no one should use. The same people who instituted the “ socially distancing “ term were and still are determined to allow everybody and their cousins to enter this country with no valid rights. Mask wearing is the least of our issues... When and if vaccines become available to the people is the bigger question.Like I posted last week ...Fall of 2021 maybe later... don’t buy the BS being filtered down.


Bob, let’s try to keep the tone down. No need to conflate issues between a border wall in the issue of immigration and restrictions on state and international travel impacting health.

Let’s stay on this issue. It sounds like you are for CDC protocols on masking wearing and which is great. We could all get into supposed hypocrisy of views when it comes to state and federal government authority. Let’s focus on COVID and follow the guidance of scientist which is pretty simple, wear masks and distance. Give scientists time to get ahead of this with treatments and vaccines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
Bob, let’s try to keep the tone down. No need to conflate issues between a border wall in the issue of immigration and restrictions on state and international travel impacting health.

Let’s stay on this issue. It sounds like you are for CDC protocols on masking wearing and which is great. We could all get into supposed hypocrisy of views when it comes to state and federal government authority. Let’s focus on COVID and follow the guidance of scientist which is pretty simple, wear masks and distance. Give scientists time to get ahead of this with treatments and vaccines.
Keeping the tone is exactly where it should be. Mask wearing isn’t the issue... where masks should or are not be required is ...if I’ m in my neighborhood with nobody around guess what? I’m not wearing a mask. The fact that there is now the conversation of restricting interstate travel during the holidays is not only a concern for me but millions of others....I love people who immediately attempt to hush , quiet the conversation if it doesn’t meet with their opinions...So are you in favor of closing off travel between states? ...I answered you on both the masks and distancing ....CDC? ... don’t flaunt the CDC ... they are as worthless as the WHO ...NIHI and anyone attached to the local , state and federal decision makers... all gave conflicting information to the public for 10 months... That is all good now since the election... so I suggest pmvon you think about telling others to “ keep the down” ... avoiding the government issue on travel is just as important as mask wearing since it impacts our freedom to move around... You must not have family as then you would not be concerned during the upcoming Holidays... some people ( millions) will still travel.
 
Keeping the tone is exactly where it should be. Mask wearing isn’t the issue... where masks should or are not be required is ...if I’ m in my neighborhood with nobody around guess what? I’m not wearing a mask. The fact that there is now the conversation of restricting interstate travel during the holidays is not only a concern for me but millions of others....I love people who immediately attempt to hush , quiet the conversation if it doesn’t meet with their opinions...So are you in favor of closing off travel between states? ...I answered you on both the masks and distancing ....CDC? ... don’t flaunt the CDC ... they are as worthless as the WHO ...NIHI and anyone attached to the local , state and federal decision makers... all gave conflicting information to the public for 10 months... That is all good now since the election... so I suggest pmvon you think about telling others to “ keep the down” ... avoiding the government issue on travel is just as important as mask wearing since it impacts our freedom to move around... You must not have family as then you would not be concerned during the upcoming Holidays... some people ( millions) will still travel.

Not avoiding the issue but trying to find common ground which will be tough if you think the CDC is worthless.

But we agree on mask wearing and distancing. I also agree if you are walking or running around your neighborhood and socially distanced, you shouldn’t have to wear a mask.

I guess we disagree regarding state and federal governments authority to limit movement when it comes to issues of public health like a pandemic. The US government did so in restricting travel from hotspots around the world and state governments are doing the same within the US. Governments all over the world are doing the same.

I do have family in different states and we are trying to figure out how the holidays will work which includes quarantining for 2 weeks before the holidays along with potentially taking tests. My father in law is 90 and declining in health. He gets COVID and the likelihood that he survives is probably very low. Our daughter has asthma and is in a higher risk category. Both my parents have health issues as well. These are the same calculations millions of your fellow Americans are making.
 
Last edited:
Not avoiding the issue but trying to find common ground which will be tough if you think the CDC is worthless.

But we agree on mask wearing and distancing. I also agree if you are walking or running around your neighborhood and socially distanced, you shouldn’t have to wear a mask.

I guess we disagree that state and federal governments have the authority to limit movement when it comes to issues of public health like a pandemic. The US government did so in restricting travel from hotspots around the world and state governments are doing the same within the US. Governments all over the world are doing the same.

I do have family in different states and we are trying to figure out how the holidays will work which includes quarantining for 2 weeks before the holidays along with potentially taking tests. My father in law is 90 and declining in health. He gets COVID and the likelihood that he survives is probably very low. Our daughter has asthma and is in a higher risk category. Both my parents have health issues as well. These are the same calculations millions of your fellow Americans are making.
No you started off by talking to me like you actually had some authority over me. Suggest as an educated guy( assume ) you not due that. You continue to bring up issues in your family which 95% of the families in the USA probably also do. Even in my family but I don’t make it a board topic since EVERYONE makes their own choices. If I ‘m around you I wear a mask which I already explained. But you are incorrect about limiting travel at this time... intrastate falls under much different rules and laws... if they attempt to restrict travel by car, track, motorcycles bikes or even walkers they will create a bigger problem. Picture the backlogs of cars , trucks etc. Then the injunctions and lawsuits will begin ... what about interstate travel for reasons of a medical , death ( not Covid related) or work ? Sorry for your family health problems but then they should stay inside... and you should if around them wear a mask... What you are saying it’s all of us that are threatening your family members and that is very false and untrue... Enjoy the Holidays as you once knew them ...
 
Not avoiding the issue but trying to find common ground which will be tough if you think the CDC is worthless.

But we agree on mask wearing and distancing. I also agree if you are walking or running around your neighborhood and socially distanced, you shouldn’t have to wear a mask.

I guess we disagree regarding state and federal governments authority to limit movement when it comes to issues of public health like a pandemic. The US government did so in restricting travel from hotspots around the world and state governments are doing the same within the US. Governments all over the world are doing the same.

I do have family in different states and we are trying to figure out how the holidays will work which includes quarantining for 2 weeks before the holidays along with potentially taking tests. My father in law is 90 and declining in health. He gets COVID and the likelihood that he survives is probably very low. Our daughter has asthma and is in a higher risk category. Both my parents have health issues as well. These are the same calculations millions of your fellow Americans are making.
And if your family ( quarantines) if interstate travel is nixed ... why quarantine at all? Not being a wise guy but how does that help anyone... nobody wishes endanger anyone’s life but some of this nonsense is still political in scope and a way to cover the mistakes and failures of those particular state governors.Once again they had about 5 months to prepare for this 2nd wave but they are dumb and people who voted them in are the ones taking the brunt of their inabilities. How can you know ... gave time to prepare but still screw it up ? Whatever happened to the makeshift hospitals ? the plans to combat the virus upon it’s return? This now falls mainly on the states who relish there autonomy only when it deems fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUfanSinceAnderson
No you started off by talking to me like you actually had some authority over me. Suggest as an educated guy( assume ) you not due that. You continue to bring up issues in your family which 95% of the families in the USA probably also do. Even in my family but I don’t make it a board topic since EVERYONE makes their own choices. If I ‘m around you I wear a mask which I already explained. But you are incorrect about limiting travel at this time... intrastate falls under much different rules and laws... if they attempt to restrict travel by car, track, motorcycles bikes or even walkers they will create a bigger problem. Picture the backlogs of cars , trucks etc. Then the injunctions and lawsuits will begin ... what about interstate travel for reasons of a medical , death ( not Covid related) or work ? Sorry for your family health problems but then they should stay inside... and you should if around them wear a mask... What you are saying it’s all of us that are threatening your family members and that is very false and untrue... Enjoy the Holidays as you once knew them ...
Bob, to be clear, I don’t keep bringing up my family. I mentioned it once in reference to your prior post saying that I must not have a family.

I am glad you are for mask wearing. Have a good holiday and be well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
Sure. You also have the right to step in front of a speeding truck. Just don't take someone with you.
Sure. You also have the right to step in front of a speeding truck. Just don't take someone with you.
Of course biggest thing is I’m not evidently suicidal like you. Why would you walk in front of a truck? People like you believe your nonsense should guide what others think about their rights. Understand one thing as I told pmvon you have no authority and you will have less moving forward . Think that’s not happening watch.
 
Bob, to be clear, I don’t keep bringing up my family. I mentioned it once in reference to your prior post saying that I must not have a family.

I am glad you are for mask wearing. Have a good holiday and be well.
You have a short memory before I mentioned anything you were on your personal soap box explaining about all your family and issues. Sorry but we ALL have illness, and elderly parents . It is amazing you believe you should shame anyone that does not follow your beliefs.
 
Bob you sure like to argue. pmvon responded to you in a very diplomatic manner and you got your panties all in a bunch

Enjoy the evening
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
You have a short memory before I mentioned anything you were on your personal soap box explaining about all your family and issues. Sorry but we ALL have illness, and elderly parents . It is amazing you believe you should shame anyone that does not follow your beliefs.
Bob,

I am trying to have a civil dialogue with you. Not sure what soap box you are talking about and you can read the thread history as to who said what and when. Never mentioned my family, you did and so I responded. In my response I also said that millions of Americans are going through the same with family members and never indicated that I believe my situation is unique. It’s not and that’s the point.

Good luck and be well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
Bob you sure like to argue. pmvon responded to you in a very diplomatic manner and you got your panties all in a bunch

Enjoy the evening
MYOFB : You should get a job working in the new administration reporting perceived violations. We’re you a kid who told the teacher in 4th grade , “ Ms. Landers Beaver pulled Judy’s pigtails.” You and pvmon should get a room at the Loop Inn. What is bad is how he started off by saying :Tone it Down... Better go back to what started my reply “old man”...
 
Bob,

I am trying to have a civil dialogue with you. Not sure what soap box you are talking about and you can read the thread history as to who said what and when. Never mentioned my family, you did and so I responded. In my response I also said that millions of Americans are going through the same with family members and never indicated that I believe my situation is unique. It’s not and that’s the point.

Good luck and be well.
You most certainly don’t read and LISTEN very well ... Had you not attempted to sound like MY father or a parental figure I would have ignored it but you couldn’t. As I told you ( pass it along to your boy tom1944 Who gave you the authority to judge how I or anyone else feels about any of the issues in the news. Your annoying rant sounded as if I or a someone else was a threat to you and the family over the wearing of masks, distancing and yada , yada...I and my family adhere to all of it and that has been since March before the mis info began from all the educated elitists from the swamp.It would never have been a problem but once again you never needed to chastise me for something I do. Like I asked ...were you for a border restriction or in favor of open borders and entry areas... no different than me being against interstate restrictions on our roadways and tunnels... Most of the drama and fear tactics are ways to take the heat off clowns like Cuomo and Murphy ... They should have bern prepared for this 2nd wave and guess what...they’re not gee what a surprise. Hope you and your family stay well .
 
Bob,

I am trying to have a civil dialogue with you. Not sure what soap box you are talking about and you can read the thread history as to who said what and when. Never mentioned my family, you did and so I responded. In my response I also said that millions of Americans are going through the same with family members and never indicated that I believe my situation is unique. It’s not and that’s the point.

Good luck and be well.
Just a final thought .you initially were adverse to my concerns over the possible restrictions coming and how I was concerned about people’s rights . That immediately caused you to in some way assume this was an attack on your 90 year old father, 2 asthmatics, and I’m not going back to re check . Do you remember this? You started the entire initial back and forth and why because it doesn’t meet with your thinkings or approvals. Now tom1944 once again complains about me but he too is a biased person when it doesn’t meet with his approval.
 
You have a short memory before I mentioned anything you were on your personal soap box explaining about all your family and issues. Sorry but we ALL have illness, and elderly parents . It is amazing you believe you should shame anyone that does not follow your beliefs.
Nobody shamed you or your family so stop the BS false claim ... that is total horse crap ... I was the one who said to you All Families have sickness and issues. Overreach is a real concern not some fake news and fear mongering.
 
Just a final thought .you initially were adverse to my concerns over the possible restrictions coming and how I was concerned about people’s rights . That immediately caused you to in some way assume this was an attack on your 90 year old father, 2 asthmatics, and I’m not going back to re check . Do you remember this? You started the entire initial back and forth and why because it doesn’t meet with your thinkings or approvals. Now tom1944 once again complains about me but he too is a biased person when it doesn’t meet with his approval.
Me wants numbers and Rubar back. Sorry guys, please come back and talk science.
 
What governments around the world are asking is for people to wear masks and social distance for your health and the citizens around you. This isn’t a US right or left thing, or some reduction of your freedom. It’s science and practiced around the world. If we all band together for 2-3 months and just did this, we would all be in a better situation, including economically.

Be well.


most states have been requiring masks in businesses and work including NJ

guess what people are getting this anyway, masks are generally useless, a symbol, giving a false sense of security . The virus is controlling this pandemic not us or masks.
 
most states have been requiring masks in businesses and work including NJ

guess what people are getting this anyway, masks are generally useless, a symbol, giving a false sense of security . The virus is controlling this pandemic not us or masks.
If you think masks are useless you are an idiot. People aren’t getting it in stores where people are wearing masks. They are mostly getting it at house get togethers because when people get together at each other’s houses they aren’t wearing masks. We had high schoolers through three Halloween parties in our town and we had an outbreak amongst teens which forced our schools back to virtual.
 
Another vaccine, another big win for pharma! More coming soon.

Moderna says preliminary trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective, shares soar


Moderna said preliminary phase three trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective in preventing Covid-19 — a result CEO Stephane Bancel called a “game changer.”

The analysis evaluated 95 confirmed Covid-19 infections among the trial’s 30,000 participants. Moderna, which developed its vaccine in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said 90 cases of Covid-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 5 cases observed in the group that received its two-dose vaccine. That resulted in an estimated vaccine efficacy of 94.5%, it said.

Shares of the company jumped by more than 11% in premarket trading.

The announcement follows on the heels of similar news last week from Pfizer’s late-stage Covid-19 vaccine trial as pharmaceutical companies across the world race against the clock to find ways to prevent the virus, which has spread to more than 54.4 million people, killing more than 1.3 million, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

“This is a pivotal moment in the development of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate,” Bancel said in a statement. “Since early January, we have chased this virus with the intent to protect as many people around the world as possible. All along, we have known that each day matters. This positive interim analysis from our Phase 3 study has given us the first clinical validation that our vaccine can prevent COVID-19 disease, including severe disease.”

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company also said there were no “significant” safety concerns, adding the vaccine was generally safe and well-tolerated with the majority of adverse events in participants being labeled as mild or moderate. Side effects included pain at the injection site and, after the second dose, fatigue, muscle pain and headaches.

“Knowing that we have a vaccine that would help more people who would take it is just a wonderful feeling,” Bancel said in an interview with CNBC. “As you know a lot of people have been reluctant in surveys to take a vaccine because I think we’re worried about the politicization of a vaccine, they’re worried about what you get with a flu shot you know 50% to 60% efficacy.”

With an efficacy rate of 95%, “that’s a game-changer, I believe,” he said.
 
Another vaccine, another big win for pharma! More coming soon.

Moderna says preliminary trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective, shares soar


Moderna said preliminary phase three trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective in preventing Covid-19 — a result CEO Stephane Bancel called a “game changer.”

The analysis evaluated 95 confirmed Covid-19 infections among the trial’s 30,000 participants. Moderna, which developed its vaccine in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said 90 cases of Covid-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 5 cases observed in the group that received its two-dose vaccine. That resulted in an estimated vaccine efficacy of 94.5%, it said.

Shares of the company jumped by more than 11% in premarket trading.

The announcement follows on the heels of similar news last week from Pfizer’s late-stage Covid-19 vaccine trial as pharmaceutical companies across the world race against the clock to find ways to prevent the virus, which has spread to more than 54.4 million people, killing more than 1.3 million, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

“This is a pivotal moment in the development of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate,” Bancel said in a statement. “Since early January, we have chased this virus with the intent to protect as many people around the world as possible. All along, we have known that each day matters. This positive interim analysis from our Phase 3 study has given us the first clinical validation that our vaccine can prevent COVID-19 disease, including severe disease.”

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company also said there were no “significant” safety concerns, adding the vaccine was generally safe and well-tolerated with the majority of adverse events in participants being labeled as mild or moderate. Side effects included pain at the injection site and, after the second dose, fatigue, muscle pain and headaches.

“Knowing that we have a vaccine that would help more people who would take it is just a wonderful feeling,” Bancel said in an interview with CNBC. “As you know a lot of people have been reluctant in surveys to take a vaccine because I think we’re worried about the politicization of a vaccine, they’re worried about what you get with a flu shot you know 50% to 60% efficacy.”

With an efficacy rate of 95%, “that’s a game-changer, I believe,” he said.
More info from Bloomberg.....important part of the results:

Only five participants who received two doses of the vaccine became sick, compared with 90 coronavirus cases in participants who received a placebo, according to a review by an independent data safety monitoring board appointed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

The vaccine also appeared to be effective in preventing the most serious Covid-19 infections. There were no severe cases among people who got the vaccine, compared with 11 in volunteers who received placebo shots, according to Moderna’s statement.

 
More info from Bloomberg.....important part of the results:

Only five participants who received two doses of the vaccine became sick, compared with 90 coronavirus cases in participants who received a placebo, according to a review by an independent data safety monitoring board appointed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

The vaccine also appeared to be effective in preventing the most serious Covid-19 infections. There were no severe cases among people who got the vaccine, compared with 11 in volunteers who received placebo shots, according to Moderna’s statement.

Great news and more to come!
 
MYOFB : You should get a job working in the new administration reporting perceived violations. We’re you a kid who told the teacher in 4th grade , “ Ms. Landers Beaver pulled Judy’s pigtails.” You and pvmon should get a room at the Loop Inn. What is bad is how he started off by saying :Tone it Down... Better go back to what started my reply “old man”...

You are too easy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
most states have been requiring masks in businesses and work including NJ

guess what people are getting this anyway, masks are generally useless, a symbol, giving a false sense of security . The virus is controlling this pandemic not us or masks.


I still see a lot of improper mask wearing. Two deli's by me the majority of staff has the mask barely above their mouth with their nose fully exposed.

So 2 places I have stopped going for pick up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
More info from Bloomberg.....important part of the results:

Only five participants who received two doses of the vaccine became sick, compared with 90 coronavirus cases in participants who received a placebo, according to a review by an independent data safety monitoring board appointed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

The vaccine also appeared to be effective in preventing the most serious Covid-19 infections. There were no severe cases among people who got the vaccine, compared with 11 in volunteers who received placebo shots, according to Moderna’s statement.


That sounds like some additional great news concerning the no severe cases among the 5 getting the vaccine who still contracted COVID. I don't believe that the Pfizer results addressed this, but it is an important facet as to whether those who still get COVID despite the vaccine will get disease mitigation due to the vaccine.
 
That sounds like some additional great news concerning the no severe cases among the 5 getting the vaccine who still contracted COVID. I don't believe that the Pfizer results addressed this, but it is an important facet as to whether those who still get COVID despite the vaccine will get disease mitigation due to the vaccine.
+1
Vaccines are suppose to prevent infections and lessen the severity of cases if infected. Great to see some data showing the latter benefit.

2021 - Return to Normalcy! :)
 
most states have been requiring masks in businesses and work including NJ

guess what people are getting this anyway, masks are generally useless, a symbol, giving a false sense of security . The virus is controlling this pandemic not us or masks.
That is a strange conclusion to draw without any concrete evidence. Contact tracing has indicated that colleges/universities, parties/gatherings (where people don't wear masks) and restaurants (where people don't wear masks when seated) have caused an outbreak of cases in many locales. Have you a link for contract tracing of people who have worn masks every time they are in public to support your statement?
 
Another vaccine, another big win for pharma! More coming soon.

Moderna says preliminary trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective, shares soar


Moderna said preliminary phase three trial data shows its coronavirus vaccine is more than 94% effective in preventing Covid-19 — a result CEO Stephane Bancel called a “game changer.”

The analysis evaluated 95 confirmed Covid-19 infections among the trial’s 30,000 participants. Moderna, which developed its vaccine in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said 90 cases of Covid-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 5 cases observed in the group that received its two-dose vaccine. That resulted in an estimated vaccine efficacy of 94.5%, it said.

Shares of the company jumped by more than 11% in premarket trading.

The announcement follows on the heels of similar news last week from Pfizer’s late-stage Covid-19 vaccine trial as pharmaceutical companies across the world race against the clock to find ways to prevent the virus, which has spread to more than 54.4 million people, killing more than 1.3 million, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

“This is a pivotal moment in the development of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate,” Bancel said in a statement. “Since early January, we have chased this virus with the intent to protect as many people around the world as possible. All along, we have known that each day matters. This positive interim analysis from our Phase 3 study has given us the first clinical validation that our vaccine can prevent COVID-19 disease, including severe disease.”

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company also said there were no “significant” safety concerns, adding the vaccine was generally safe and well-tolerated with the majority of adverse events in participants being labeled as mild or moderate. Side effects included pain at the injection site and, after the second dose, fatigue, muscle pain and headaches.

“Knowing that we have a vaccine that would help more people who would take it is just a wonderful feeling,” Bancel said in an interview with CNBC. “As you know a lot of people have been reluctant in surveys to take a vaccine because I think we’re worried about the politicization of a vaccine, they’re worried about what you get with a flu shot you know 50% to 60% efficacy.”

With an efficacy rate of 95%, “that’s a game-changer, I believe,” he said.
Yep, huge! 95% effective is fantastic. Still an interim report, so we need to see the final efficacy and safety data, but having what appears to be two safe and effective COVID vaccines is a breakthrough. And the Moderna vaccine only needs -20C/-4F storage vs. Pfizer's which requires -70/-94F storage and cold chain. This is just 10.5 months from when the virus was officially announced at the end of 2019. It's also vindication for the mRNA approach, which, to date, hadn't made it into a commercial vaccine yet, but is the basis for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Great quote from Fauci below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/11/16/covid-moderna-vaccine/?utm_source=reddit.com

“It’s extremely good news. If you look at the data, the numbers speak for themselves,” said Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who was one of three people briefed on the data by an independent committee Sunday morning. “I describe myself as a realist, but I’m fundamentally a cautious optimist. I felt we’d likely get something less than this. … I said certainly a 90-plus-percent effective vaccine is possible, but I wasn’t counting on it.”

Of the 95 cases of covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, 90 were in the group that received the placebo. There were 11 severe cases reported — all in people who received the placebo. With cases of covid-19 confined almost exclusively to trial participants receiving a placebo, that sends a strong signal that the vaccine is effective at thwarting the virus.
 
Derek Lowe (In the Pipeline) just put up a blog post on this and it's excellent as usual. Short on time here, so I'll just quote him below with regard to the bottom line as the various posts above do a nice job of reporting on the results and storage conditions.

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/11/16/modernas-vaccine-efficacy-readout

So we’re already starting to see some differentiation between the candidates, with likely more to come. We’ll see if there’s any statistical daylight in efficacy between the Pfizer and Moderna candidates as more cases accrue (I have no idea if that’ll be the case or not). Likewise with safety. But we already have a difference in shipping and storage, and it’s in Moderna’s favor. As mentioned before here, there are several other categories that could differentiate all the vaccine candidates: point efficacy (as we have now, 14 days after the second), effect on severity of disease when it does occur, duration of efficacy (which we’ll need time for, and there’s no other way), overall safety (which also needs big numbers and will sharpen with longer time points), and whatever differences in all these categories may show up in different patient populations. Those will take time to emerge, too, most likely,

But make no mistake: right now the vaccine news is very good indeed. Effective ones are coming, and what I said when the Pfizer results came about applies even more now, because this good news is coming against a stark background. The coronavirus statistics here in the US now are very, very bad, with cases, hospitalizations, and deaths all rising. Many areas of the country are facing ICU capacity shortages as we head into these rising numbers, and in the coming weeks a lot of people are going to die. It’s never been more important for people to take action against the pandemic: isolation as much as possible, mask wearing, avoiding indoor groups, and all that stuff that we already know about but that apparently too few people are following through on. The curves from Europe have been accelerating at a similar alarming rate, but take a look: their case numbers starting to turn back down again, and there’s no reason we can’t do that here. And we’re not going to be doing all this forever; I really think that the vaccine results we’re seeing mean that the end of all this is finally in sight. We have to make it through to getting our population vaccinated. Hang on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg2020
I still see a lot of improper mask wearing. Two deli's by me the majority of staff has the mask barely above their mouth with their nose fully exposed.

So 2 places I have stopped going for pick up.
Well bully for you... tom1944 another who believes he is responsible for what others do or think or say...Did you address those people and tell them to put their masks up... if you had any cajones you would have spoken up like you do hiding on a sports forum...I have actually confronted people in stores and businesses for that reason... Explaining why is a tough thing to do in public because it can lead to confrontation... see you like that interaction on here don’t you ? Happy Thanksgiving ...Be safe ...stay well... You’ll be locked in wherever you are if you are in NY/NJ..
 
Derek Lowe (In the Pipeline) just put up a blog post on this and it's excellent as usual. Short on time here, so I'll just quote him below with regard to the bottom line as the various posts above do a nice job of reporting on the results and storage conditions.

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/11/16/modernas-vaccine-efficacy-readout

So we’re already starting to see some differentiation between the candidates, with likely more to come. We’ll see if there’s any statistical daylight in efficacy between the Pfizer and Moderna candidates as more cases accrue (I have no idea if that’ll be the case or not). Likewise with safety. But we already have a difference in shipping and storage, and it’s in Moderna’s favor. As mentioned before here, there are several other categories that could differentiate all the vaccine candidates: point efficacy (as we have now, 14 days after the second), effect on severity of disease when it does occur, duration of efficacy (which we’ll need time for, and there’s no other way), overall safety (which also needs big numbers and will sharpen with longer time points), and whatever differences in all these categories may show up in different patient populations. Those will take time to emerge, too, most likely,

But make no mistake: right now the vaccine news is very good indeed. Effective ones are coming, and what I said when the Pfizer results came about applies even more now, because this good news is coming against a stark background. The coronavirus statistics here in the US now are very, very bad, with cases, hospitalizations, and deaths all rising. Many areas of the country are facing ICU capacity shortages as we head into these rising numbers, and in the coming weeks a lot of people are going to die. It’s never been more important for people to take action against the pandemic: isolation as much as possible, mask wearing, avoiding indoor groups, and all that stuff that we already know about but that apparently too few people are following through on. The curves from Europe have been accelerating at a similar alarming rate, but take a look: their case numbers starting to turn back down again, and there’s no reason we can’t do that here. And we’re not going to be doing all this forever; I really think that the vaccine results we’re seeing mean that the end of all this is finally in sight. We have to make it through to getting our population vaccinated. Hang on.
So looking like late Fall 2021 before any release to the general population.
 
That is a strange conclusion to draw without any concrete evidence. Contact tracing has indicated that colleges/universities, parties/gatherings (where people don't wear masks) and restaurants (where people don't wear masks when seated) have caused an outbreak of cases in many locales. Have you a link for contract tracing of people who have worn masks every time they are in public to support your statement?
He has no concrete evidence for that because there is none. Masks work when distancing isn't feasible - they're not perfect, but they're far better than no masks.
 
So looking like late Fall 2021 before any release to the general population.
How did you get that out of anything that's been posted? Based on statements from Pfizer, Moderna and government scientists, like Fauci, we should be able to vaccinate high risk people (tens of millions) by the end of 1Q21 and vaccines for the general population should be rolling out by March/April, but will obviously take a few months to vaccinate the ~160MM people (~50%) who have said they would get vaccinated. My hope is with strong vaccine results we can get more like 75% vaccinated and we have other vaccines likely to be effective and on the market soon, too.
 
Me wants numbers and Rubar back. Sorry guys, please come back and talk science.
It's astonishing to me that there are arguments over wearing masks, when the science for them being far more effective than not wearing masks is crystal clear. Every country that is doing very well against COVID has near universal mask wearing. We do not and Europe does not either.
 
It's astonishing to me that there are arguments over wearing masks, when the science for them being far more effective than not wearing masks is crystal clear. Every country that is doing very well against COVID has near universal mask wearing. We do not and Europe does not either.
You have to remember the constant bar changing for bac. First the virus was a hoax or similar to the flu, then the death toll was being propped up, now masks are useless cause "virus gonna virus". I'm sure I left off other deflections.
 
How did you get that out of anything that's been posted? Based on statements from Pfizer, Moderna and government scientists, like Fauci, we should be able to vaccinate high risk people (tens of millions) by the end of 1Q21 and vaccines for the general population should be rolling out by March/April, but will obviously take a few months to vaccinate the ~160MM people (~50%) who have said they would get vaccinated. My hope is with strong vaccine results we can get more like 75% vaccinated and we have other vaccines likely to be effective and on the market soon, too
To be honest I was just expressing this simple reality .It is not doing anyone any good until the vaccine is available. All respect “ old man”... the hope is great ... an actual vaccine being distributed would be better. You may still be posting efficacy updates in 2022. I hope not but you are relying on info from people who may be wrong?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT