ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Great read: How Rutgers wrestling became a national force

Leonard23

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Feb 3, 2006
28,706
10,837
113
http://www.app.com/story/sports/col...ers-wrestling-became-national-force/80002990/

Great read about the growth of R wrestling program. Goodale is a miracle worker. Some quotes:

Goodale was hired at a starting salary of $65,000. His only demand was to bring Leonardis as an assistant coach.

* * *

Goodale inherited a program with 3.4 scholarships – far below the NCAA maximum of 9.9 – and the lowest NCAA Academic Progress Rate multi-year score (904) of any at Rutgers.

“There were times we were borrowing from our budget to give a women’s sport a scholarship,” Goodale said, “as long as we got our scholarship.”

Today, Rutgers is fully funded and its APR score is 966, after topping out at 974 on the 1,000-point scale. Rutgers ranks 10th out of 14 wrestling teams in the Big Ten in APR, which measures graduation and retention rates.

[Note we're only fully funded at in state tuition rates, recently & not OOS, which is still a disadvantage]

* * *
"Scott has a wealth of knowledge about wrestling, but he does a lot of things that other coaches can’t do," Pritzlaff said. "He speaks about his program better than anybody I’ve ever been around. Boosters love him. Recruits love him. It’s outside-the-box, but I think wrestling would do better if they did more hires like this.”

* * *

Leonardis recalls his boss asking to swap out charter buses for yellow school buses and hotel stays for morning-of-match commutes.

“He wanted to get the guys tougher," Leonardis said, "and the administration said, ‘We can’t do that. There is certain protocol.’ Whereas most coaches would turn around and say we aren’t being supported because we don’t have a state-of-the-art facility or we don’t have this, he was like, ‘I want less.’”
 
  • Like
Reactions: scarletcrew
And this is without the money.

Imagine what happens here in Athletics with the right coach and the additional $$$$.

Since the latter is on the way we just need to identify if the ones here already are good enough to stay or go out and get the right ones for whatever sport needs one.
 
Coaching and recruiting. Goodale is a good coach AND a good recruiter. He has NJ ties having been a well regarded coach in Jackson before.

It really isn't that hard a formula.
 
NJ coach, experienced and great recruiter. Like Fred Hill Sr.
 
Ash should print that out and give it to every NJ recruit and say "we need you to to help us get to the same place on the gridiron".
 
Thanks for the read OP. Great story. I expect Rutgers to be T5 in the country in the not too distant future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leonard23
It really isn't that hard a formula.
No it's not...when you have the right chemist. ;)

He basically built the program from the ground up to what it is today. It was a year removed from nearly being cut when he took over.

Amazing story.
It really is.

And as I said before this was all done WITHOUT the $$$$. Makes it even more amazing IMO.
NJ coach, experienced and great recruiter. Like Fred Hill Sr.
Trifecta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gogs7
The blueprint to build ALL of our Olympic programs into Top 20 ones! Being relatively close to this, from Day 1, I gotta say it's been a beautiful thing to watch and, I'll be honest, not always one that everybody involved felt was going to FINALLY "turn the corner" - even as recently as a couple years ago - but it did!
 
Goodale's #1 recruit: Pritzlaff. Guy is solid gold. Great article.

I was at RU pre-Goodale. B1G membership has helped, but it has been Goodale, his staff, and the men they coach, that has moved RU wrestling up the mountain.
 
“He wanted to get the guys tougher," Leonardis said, "and the administration said, ‘We can’t do that. There is certain protocol.’ Whereas most coaches would turn around and say we aren’t being supported because we don’t have a state-of-the-art facility or we don’t have this, he was like, ‘I want less.’”

While this isn't a blue print for building successful programs across the board, as I believe wrestlers are more apt to be willing to grind on everything, our hoops coaches could have a little of this attitude. It would help.
 
While this isn't a blue print for building successful programs across the board, as I believe wrestlers are more apt to be willing to grind on everything, our hoops coaches could have a little of this attitude. It would help.

So are hockey players.

Just sayin'. ;)
 
Last edited:
Anytime someone brings up facilities as holding us back I always think of the movie, Rocky 3.

Rocky had all the facilities and the $$$ but still got his ass kicked by Clubber. I find that it is just a poor excuse most of the time and I onow you want to impress fans and recruits but I think proper coaching and wins speak louder.
 
Wrestling and WBB are evidence that bad facilities are easily forgotten when you have good coaching.
 
“He wanted to get the guys tougher," Leonardis said, "and the administration said, ‘We can’t do that. There is certain protocol.’ Whereas most coaches would turn around and say we aren’t being supported because we don’t have a state-of-the-art facility or we don’t have this, he was like, ‘I want less.’”

While this isn't a blue print for building successful programs across the board, as I believe wrestlers are more apt to be willing to grind on everything, our hoops coaches could have a little of this attitude. It would help.

I'm talking about the overall picture, and general "blue print," it's VERY difficult to argue that it wouldn't work for just about every Olympic sport. I'm talking about the hire, the building of the SKWC, the time and effort, letting the building of the program continue to run its course, etc, etc, etc. not one little thing that may/may not be agreed upon and one that, IMHO, makes him shine even more.

Are you really going to tell me that you wouldn't want:

- the #1 high school coach in the state, with a huge following, to take over a downtrodden program?
- due any and everything he could, within his budget restraints, to get this best kids here REGARDLESS of those detriments?
- work nonstop, day-and-night-and-weekend, not only at training and growing the program but at finding the right people - outside of the program itself (alumni, fans, etc), to help grow the program - THE RIGHT WAY - by putting together a "club" that models the best in the nation?
- to have attracted one of the top names in the sport, away from a new "rival" school and better program, to come home and help?
- to be - within a decade and WITHOUT the facilities, yet - on the verge of being a perenially top-15 ranked program (and Top 10, nationally, in attendance)?
- to have those facilities, finally, looming on the horizon?

....for both men's and women's lacrosse? I think you would, right? GREAT stuff IMHO! [banana]
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT