A lot of fool's gold to sift through. Cignetti lit it up this year. And Prime turned it around this year. He got a great QB recruit. Will both coaches have sustained success? Time will tell.
Rutgers football was acceptable for what it was under Frank Burns.. then expectations (and competition) increased to a point where it was not.
Graber waffled between hope and dashed hopes over and over into unacceptable territory.
Shea could not recover and made things worse.
Schiano 1.0 earned actual respect for Rutgers Football but had his failures too. He parlayed it into a promotion to the NFL.
Flood inherited a respected program and ran it back into disrespected territory.
Ash made it worse.
Schiano 2.0 has made progress in bringing it back. It is acceptable now and, hopefully soon will be respected again.
I do not find it reasonable to assume we need to hold a standard of Top 25 finish every season. Surely that is a worthy goal, a possibly achievable goal.. but it will take a lot of work.'
Even if we had Indiana's season this year with a first-year coach like Cignetti or Sanders, we'd have no idea how long that would last. We do not know what the buyout option is for Cignetti after his extension. It was not made public.... which is suspicious. My guess would be that it reveals that Indiana committed a lot of money toward Cignetti, but Cignetti kept his options open.
"Respectable" got us into the Big Ten.
"Respectable" puts fans in the seats.
I think that is a good achievable goal and will not have us playing games in the coaching carousel looking to strike gold while most do not not strike gold. Look at Rutgers past coaches.. we have done far worse than what we have more often than not.
Now.. if we had Shea/Ash-level coaching still.. sure, spin that wheel again and again and hope for the best.