He’s perfect for a bad “mid-major” team with a few good O lineman. He at least raises the floor in terms of wins just based on his running ability and a coach might keep himself off the hot seat by winning 6 games. He just played a season in the SEC which produces NFL DB’s by the bucket full!Good for him or any Western outfits looking for a scatter gun to round out the crew.
Imagine how much this kid is gonna make in his 5 year college career with marginal achievements at best. What a new system.
Does this mean he isn't going to win the Heisman?
Fieldhouse Al of La Mancha will anoint him winner of something else, something more romantic in Al’s fantasiesDoes this mean he isn't going to win the Heisman?
He was the starting QB and captain of our third best team in our BIG history.Wimsatt lovers defending their incorrect opinion to their death!
Turn the page, he wasn't a good QB. I feel bad for the person/business that put up the NIL money. Not a good business plan!
Paging Delusional Al… paging Delusional Al…..Does this mean he isn't going to win the Heisman?
Rutgers won because of the defense and Kyle. If you really think Wimsatt was a star as a player well....He was the starting QB and captain of our third best team in our BIG history.
I do agree he wasn’t a good QB , so that’s a sad statistic
At a lower level, where his athleticism would be even a bigger threat to run, and run over smaller opponents, I think he could light it up
Paging the defense and Klye in regards to the third best team. Gavin just happpened to be the one taking the snaps.He was the starting QB and captain of our third best team in our BIG history.
I do agree he wasn’t a good QB , so that’s a sad statistic
Then he should play running backHe set a Rutgers record for running yards (season) and running TDs - he led B1G - opponent size wasn't a problem.
He was a dual threat QB playing for a coach who doesn't like running QBs, and a staff that changed every year without any idea how to coach QBs (and he left HS a year early when he shouldn't have - GS agreed). Oh and his WRs were worst crew in years, and he wasn't allowed to throw long, because of OL (GS said). GW is just another QB wreck in RU's wake (I mean even Savage got wrecked at RU)
“I think you always have to judge a quarterback based upon what the record is and how the team does,” Teel said. “At the end of the day, the kid did win seven games this past year, and he did lead the team to a bowl win. Overall, I think he did a great job.” - Mike Teel
How Rutgers’ Gavin Wimsatt went from trumpeted recruit to another QB failure
Gavin Wimsatt was once seen as Rutgers football's quarterback of the future. That hope officially died when he entered the transfer portal late last month.www.nj.com
He set a Rutgers record for running yards (season) and running TDs - he led B1G - opponent size wasn't a problem.
He was a dual threat QB playing for a coach who doesn't like running QBs, and a staff that changed every year without any idea how to coach QBs (and he left HS a year early when he shouldn't have - GS agreed). Oh and his WRs were worst crew in years, and he wasn't allowed to throw long, because of OL (GS said). GW is just another QB wreck in RU's wake (I mean even Savage got wrecked at RU)
“I think you always have to judge a quarterback based upon what the record is and how the team does,” Teel said. “At the end of the day, the kid did win seven games this past year, and he did lead the team to a bowl win. Overall, I think he did a great job.” - Mike Teel
How Rutgers’ Gavin Wimsatt went from trumpeted recruit to another QB failure
Gavin Wimsatt was once seen as Rutgers football's quarterback of the future. That hope officially died when he entered the transfer portal late last month.www.nj.com
Are we supposed to agree with Teel or just figure he had no idea what he was talking about ?
He set a Rutgers record for running yards (season) and running TDs - he led B1G - opponent size wasn't a problem.
He was a dual threat QB playing for a coach who doesn't like running QBs, and a staff that changed every year without any idea how to coach QBs (and he left HS a year early when he shouldn't have - GS agreed). Oh and his WRs were worst crew in years, and he wasn't allowed to throw long, because of OL (GS said). GW is just another QB wreck in RU's wake (I mean even Savage got wrecked at RU)
“I think you always have to judge a quarterback based upon what the record is and how the team does,” Teel said. “At the end of the day, the kid did win seven games this past year, and he did lead the team to a bowl win. Overall, I think he did a great job.” - Mike Teel
How Rutgers’ Gavin Wimsatt went from trumpeted recruit to another QB failure
Gavin Wimsatt was once seen as Rutgers football's quarterback of the future. That hope officially died when he entered the transfer portal late last month.www.nj.com
So why even ask a so called expert for analysis or an opinion if we are just going to disregard it anyway.?Neither, I think. Probably should take the timing of what he said into context. Gavin, after all, was the starting QB on a team that had qualified for a bowl for the first time in 9 years. As you alluded in other threads - at the time, one could make an argument that he was a “Rutgers star” by association - or something along those lines. He played the position of leader on a team that by Rutgers metrics was successful. So the timing was right to say positive things about him.
But the flip side to that, of course, is none of that means he possesses the skills to be a successful QB at the FBS level (and possibly not even a step down). It just means he wasn’t bad enough to hold a team that excelled in other areas back. That team had the success it did because we had a top 25 D, a solid OL and a super star RB and our QB was kept on a leash to avoid bad turnovers we couldn’t afford. Credit him for executing a couple great rush plays for big yardage that were made possible on large part by the threat of our star RB. The folks who argued the reverse were proven wrong this season. Kyle’s rushing was not helped by the threat of Gavin. Rather - the opposite.
Agree with Teel on what? That GW was the best option in 2023, and the staff found a way to leverage his skill set to a successful season. I will agree with that. But unless he plays for Army or Navy or a very limited number of teams, he has not been able the most important skill set of a QB- to accurately and consistently throw the ball. Does it matter that with 3 years of experience, he was not able to beat out 2 much younger freshman or sophomore QBs at Kentucky?Are we supposed to agree with Teel or just figure he had no idea what he was talking about ?
He was a running QB when told to run. He rarely used his legs to extend plays or take off when coverage was down field.He set a Rutgers record for running yards (season) and running TDs - he led B1G - opponent size wasn't a problem.
He was a dual threat QB playing for a coach who doesn't like running QBs, and a staff that changed every year without any idea how to coach QBs (and he left HS a year early when he shouldn't have - GS agreed). Oh and his WRs were worst crew in years, and he wasn't allowed to throw long, because of OL (GS said). GW is just another QB wreck in RU's wake (I mean even Savage got wrecked at RU)
“I think you always have to judge a quarterback based upon what the record is and how the team does,” Teel said. “At the end of the day, the kid did win seven games this past year, and he did lead the team to a bowl win. Overall, I think he did a great job.” - Mike Teel
How Rutgers’ Gavin Wimsatt went from trumpeted recruit to another QB failure
Gavin Wimsatt was once seen as Rutgers football's quarterback of the future. That hope officially died when he entered the transfer portal late last month.www.nj.com
I think you know the answer to your question.He was a running QB when told to run. He rarely used his legs to extend plays or take off when coverage was down field.
I do not know if he did not have that freedom from the OC( AK clearly has that freedom).
This to me was always his biggest issue. He didnt use his athletic ability to extend or create.
That is my opinion also. I believe he struggled to read full fields and make correct decisions.I think you know the answer to your question.
My opinion has been. Gavin wasn’t trusted with decision making and his ball security. Everything was scripted and he wasn’t allowed or trusted to improvise. Gavin was given a limited version of a very limited playbook that Kirk employs. Gavin was not trusted to make simple RPO reads, not trusted to throw over the middle, and wasn’t given the green light to run to escape when the pocket broke down.
Agree with Teel on what? That GW was the best option in 2023, and the staff found a way to leverage his skill set to a successful season. I will agree with that. But unless he plays for Army or Navy or a very limited number of teams, he has not been able the most important skill set of a QB- to accurately and consistently throw the ball. Does it matter that with 3 years of experience, he was not able to beat out 2 much younger freshman or sophomore QBs at Kentucky?
He was a running QB when told to run. He rarely used his legs to extend plays or take off when coverage was down field.
I do not know if he did not have that freedom from the OC( AK clearly has that freedom).
This to me was always his biggest issue. He didnt use his athletic ability to extend or create.
So then why even bother asking an expert for analysis ? If we are going to disregard it anywayNeither, I think. Probably should take the timing of what he said into context. Gavin, after all, was the starting QB on a team that had qualified for a bowl for the first time in 9 years. As you alluded in other threads - at the time, one could make an argument that he was a “Rutgers star” by association - or something along those lines. He played the position of leader on a team that by Rutgers metrics was successful. So the timing was right to say positive things about him.
But the flip side to that, of course, is none of that means he possesses the skills to be a successful QB at the FBS level (and possibly not even a step down). It just means he wasn’t bad enough to hold a team that excelled in other areas back. That team had the success it did because we had a top 25 D, a solid OL and a super star RB and our QB was kept on a leash to avoid bad turnovers we couldn’t afford. Credit him for executing a couple great rush plays for big yardage that were made possible on large part by the threat of our star RB. The folks who argued the reverse were proven wrong this season. Kyle’s rushing was not helped by the threat of Gavin. Rather - the opposite.
Because it’s all just sports discussion on a message board. Shouldn’t be surprising that there are a variety of opinions.So then why even bother asking an expert for analysis ? If we are going to disregard it anyway
But I would think an expert that played the position (for this HC ) knows more than some random people on a message board.Because it’s all just sports discussion on a message board. Shouldn’t be surprising that there are a variety of opinions.
Wow another wild excuse for a guy that was one dimensional playing at a multi dimension position.I think you know the answer to your question.
My opinion has been. Gavin wasn’t trusted with decision making and his ball security. Everything was scripted and he wasn’t allowed or trusted to improvise. Gavin was given a limited version of a very limited playbook that Kirk employs. Gavin was not trusted to make simple RPO reads, not trusted to throw over the middle, and wasn’t given the green light to run to escape when the pocket broke down.
But I would think an expert that played the position (for this HC ) knows more than some random people on a message board.
As a Back up, duhhh. Probably was a better RB than QB as his two college stops has shown.Over Kyle ? You crazy