This will probably ruin your day ... you are not the only individual reading this thread.Love this pickup. Welcome Peter!
I'm well aware of where Hodgson played prior to RU, thanks, and yes he was.
SHOOTERS.. we need em.. and to have our current players improve there dramatically.. so I hope they are shooting a whole lot of trees since the season ended and all summer long.
A puff of white smoke but I think he missed the tree.More shooting practice required.
He shot .425 (.462 if you remove his 3-pt attempts) from the floor. Where was he scoring from?One detail you got wrong. Laurent could not finish at the rim.
Only a Rutgers fan can look at a guy who shoots 27% from three and say "he can shoot". The making is the part that matters.Good pickup. He can shoot, has good size, proven D1 (albeit low-level), and we get him for three years. If any of these were not true, I'd reconsider. I expect him to be better than about half of our current roster.
Only a Rutgers fan can look at a guy who shoots 27% from three and say "he can shoot". The making is the part that matters.
Not from around the rim. If you watched his play, he couldn't finish.He shot .425 (.462 if you remove his 3-pt attempts) from the floor. Where was he scoring from?
So if you ignore a bunch of misses he shot a torrid 32% from three? LOL.Didn't hit his first until the 3rd game, and his shot fell apart over the last 5 games (hit a freshman wall?). For most of the season, though, he was shooting .327 - not terrible.
Hopefully a year of S&C and practice can help him improve his consistency. He took a lot of mid-range shots from what I saw in limited film, which is something that was lacking from our offense last year.
So if you ignore a bunch of misses he shot a torrid 32% from three? LOL.
There is a also a big difference between the level of defense in the Big Ten vs. the MAAC. I hope he becomes a much better outside shooter by the time he takes the floor for RU. As of now, 27% in the MAAC does not make someone a "shooter". I also never assume a player is automatically going to get better as he gets older. I've seen too many examples of guys who are what they are.Bronson Koenig shot 32% from 3 as a freshman. Unless you were a total cynic you could see then he had the skill set to be a great shooter as he matured.
There is a big difference between didn't shoot well in his first year and isn't a good shooter.
Kiss didn't even play basketball all four years of high school. Therefore, it is not crazy to believe he will show more improvement than the average player. What he did last year was with raw talent.There is a also a big difference between the level of defense in the Big Ten vs. the MAAC. I hope he becomes a much better outside shooter by the time he takes the floor for RU. As of now, 27% in the MAAC does not make someone a "shooter". I also never assume a player is automatically going to get better as he gets older. I've seen too many examples of guys who are what they are.
TRUST in Pike!! I'm sure he feels Kiss provides good potential and a good fit for this team.There is a also a big difference between the level of defense in the Big Ten vs. the MAAC. I hope he becomes a much better outside shooter by the time he takes the floor for RU. As of now, 27% in the MAAC does not make someone a "shooter". I also never assume a player is automatically going to get better as he gets older. I've seen too many examples of guys who are what they are.
Only a Rutgers fan can look at a guy who shoots 27% from three and say "he can shoot". The making is the part that matters.
Only a Rutgers fan can look at a guy who shoots 27% from three and say "he can shoot". The making is the part that matters.
You got me there. Fro some reason, I did think his numbers were better. I watched him play a couple of times and I still like him though. I'd like to see a grad transfer or JUCO that can play next but after that the recruiting really needs to pick up. Mathis would be huge.
Bizarre if you ask me...seems like a few are equating his whiteness with his ability to shoot
Probably a Pistol Pete, Larry Bird thing. Dude could be green and from the 4th planet, and it wouldn't matter.Bizarre if you ask me...seems like a few are equating his whiteness with his ability to shoot
I was taking his shooting for granted.. but that line.. 0-6 from tree (or three).. not good. At some point you gotta stop shooting the long ball and hit the boards.. and those 9 RBs could be just that.If anyone's interested, I found a complete game on YouTube, Quinnipiac vs Fairfield from 2/17 - someone with more basketball savvy than myself can maybe breakdown more of his overall game beyond just a highlight reel. Kiss' line was 17 pts (6-18, 0-6), 9 rbs, 5 ast, 2 stl, 1 blk, 3 to, 2 pf.
I was taking his shooting for granted.. but that line.. 0-6 from tree (or three).. not good. At some point you gotta stop shooting the long ball and hit the boards.. and those 9 RBs could be just that.
We need trees that can hit threes... and threes that can guard trees when needed.