http://www.dailytargum.com/article/2015/08/rutgers-quarterbacks-light-it-up-in-first-scrimmage
Nice analysis from Targum, looks more Rettig to me based on this. Notable was Laviano "freezing up" in the red zone.
If you're not first , you're last - Ricky Bobby's daddyIf you have two QBs, you have none.
In my exprieence(I played at Cornell) the PLAYERS probably already have a feel for who they think will be the leader and who they will support.....but no one wants to get quoted LOLI just feel that we have nobody right now that is clearly this team's leader. Laviano has very limited experience that, IMO, means little to this equation. Many seem to think that Rettig has more to offer, but that remains to be seen in real action.
My concern is that we have a real quandary when it comes to leading the offense and that will not work.
I agree 100%. All I saw with Lanviano was mostly hand offs. Go with the guy with the most potential. Laviano could not beat out Nova whom most on this board hated. So let's go with the 4 star. Flood says when picks one qb he is staying with him, I think he says this because he already knows. Like last year, I believe he was going with Nova all along.Saw nothing from Laviano last year when he was in the game. Other than quick feet, his passing and decision making were suspect. Our best shot is that Rettig lives up to the hype of a national recruit and 4 star rating. If Laviano wins the job, our ceiling is 5-7 at best. We need a QB who instills fear in the heart of the opponent's d so the safeties back off and let our running game evolve. Otherwise we are screwed.
I certainly hope that this does not factor into Flood's choice here. I hope it doesn't stop him from developing a young QB because he knows he got Russo coming in. Make Russo win the job... he can do it.. right?
I know what I'd do. :smiley:[banana][cheers]And what are we going to do with all these guys when our Elete 11 QB arrives next year ?
I expect Russo to red shirt next year.
A team who plays two QB's is a team without a QB. My wish is that Flood and his assistants take a good hard look at both QB's and determine who gives us the best chance to win.
If the winner is going to the guy, and will get the time to grow into the job, then the one with biggest upside has to get the job, and that is Rettig
Why does rettig have the bigger upside?
Parcells did have Simms and Hostetler in 1990.Tell that to Bill Parcells
It appears to be the opinion of most.Because I think he as more talent, a stronger arm, and has made huge strides since the spring game. I just see him getting better and better. With Floods attitude of not switching, Laviano might be more prepared now, but I don't think he will be better in the long run. Just my opinion.
Size and arm strength look about the same to me.
I agreeSo I have now added the option to pick a 2QB platoon...any takers?
Ya, given how tight it is, and a scrimmage just a couple days away, why not wait till after the scrimmage.![]()
We're waiting! I am guessing we hear Sunday or Monday morning.
Sticking with my Rettig pick, even tho some part of me thinks Flood will go with Laviano.
I hope it is indigestion, because we did not move the ball with Laviano at QB last night.Laviano is the safer choice for the coaching staff and Rettig has the higher ceiling. My gut feeling is that the staff will choose Laviano.
I hope it is indigestion, because we did not move the ball with Laviano at QB last night.