ADVERTISEMENT

POLL What Should the Line Be For the Washington Game

Realistic Line for opening Game - Pick Closest One

  • Rutgers +7

    Votes: 11 12.5%
  • Rutgers +10

    Votes: 13 14.8%
  • Rutgers +15

    Votes: 27 30.7%
  • Rutgers +20

    Votes: 16 18.2%
  • Rutgers + 25

    Votes: 11 12.5%
  • even

    Votes: 10 11.4%

  • Total voters
    88
Would be a lot answer to respond to a choice of spreads as such:

0-10
10.5 - 14
14.5 - 17
17.5 - 20
20.5 +
 
  • Like
Reactions: Block R
Nuts - is there a way to change the choices once the poll is set up? Your choices make more sense.
 
Looks the votes think the game will be closer than the Vegas morons think.
 
+7 for their home field advantage. You can't use data from broken Rutgers 2015 to figure out a point spread for 2016.
Throw away what you saw in the Spring game. That is not what the team will look like.
 
+7 for their home field advantage. You can't use data from broken Rutgers 2015 to figure out a point spread for 2016.
Throw away what you saw in the Spring game. That is not what the team will look like.

This.
The RU offense will be totally different than the tapes from last season that Coach Petersen and his staff will review. The line for this game is based on the false perception of a Flood led underperforming team and overmatched Coaching staff that no longer exists. Get ready for a real surprise on September 3rd.
 
It could get ugly. They just have too many weapons and our offense may not do our defense any favors. Wish this game was later in the year.
 
Watch this. This is a game in which Carroo's replacement had to come in and pick it up. There is life after Carroo.

 
Not-for-nothing but that was against the 126th Passing D in the nation.
Not for nothing but Washington was ranked below Washington State in passing defense last year.
When we played WSU last year, Grant had most of the receptions, and Scarff, Flanagan and Bergen saw a lot of action. Carroo did not score any touchdowns that game. We can all sit here and twist statistics from last year, which are meaningless because it is a new offense this year and a new coaching staff.
 
Watch this. This is a game in which Carroo's replacement had to come in and pick it up. There is life after Carroo.


Three things jump out at me from this game:
  1. Carroo and Martin were having a contest to see who could get the most TD's.
  2. There were some damn good passes in this game, which doesn't fit into the narrative of those who detest everything Laviano.
  3. Even against Indiana's O Line, Laviano did not always have a lot of time back there.
  4. Okay, a fourth thing: great to see Paul James get that TD - that was an echo of his capability before that Navy defender took out his knee.
 
Not for nothing but Washington was ranked below Washington State in passing defense last year.
When we played WSU last year, Grant had most of the receptions, and Scarff, Flanagan and Bergen saw a lot of action. Carroo did not score any touchdowns that game. We can all sit here and twist statistics from last year, which are meaningless because it is a new offense this year and a new coaching staff.
And that could be one of the issues. I really, really wish we played Howard first, then UW, so we could break in that offense under game conditions against an inferior opponent.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT