Looks the votes think the game will be closer than the Vegas morons think.
Right, clearly a sampling of guys on a Rutgers Football message board is a great population to use for this study.
+100, why even bother to talk senseRight, clearly a sampling of guys on a Rutgers Football message board is a great population to use for this study.
+7 for their home field advantage. You can't use data from broken Rutgers 2015 to figure out a point spread for 2016.
+7 for their home field advantage. You can't use data from broken Rutgers 2015 to figure out a point spread for 2016.
Throw away what you saw in the Spring game. That is not what the team will look like.
:-) Lets wait and hear what RU Al says in his analysis, and reduce his RU score by 10 and go with that.lol...says who?
Watch this. This is a game in which Carroo's replacement had to come in and pick it up. There is life after Carroo.
Not for nothing but Washington was ranked below Washington State in passing defense last year.Not-for-nothing but that was against the 126th Passing D in the nation.
I think we'll be significant underdogs, but that seems a little high.+100, why even bother to talk sense
Watch this. This is a game in which Carroo's replacement had to come in and pick it up. There is life after Carroo.
And that could be one of the issues. I really, really wish we played Howard first, then UW, so we could break in that offense under game conditions against an inferior opponent.Not for nothing but Washington was ranked below Washington State in passing defense last year.
When we played WSU last year, Grant had most of the receptions, and Scarff, Flanagan and Bergen saw a lot of action. Carroo did not score any touchdowns that game. We can all sit here and twist statistics from last year, which are meaningless because it is a new offense this year and a new coaching staff.