Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO Texas should be in regardless of the FSU result.Texas won at Bama. Florida State loses they should be in.
Assuming Michigan wins even if FSU gets in I don’t think they will get higher than a 4th seed.We got CHAOS!
Down to four scenarios. Here goes:
SCENARIO 1: Michigan wins, FSU loses.
IMO it's Texas, Alabama, and Georgia, in that order. Georgia is left without a chair when the music stops.
- Michigan
- Washington
- Texas
- Alabama
SCENARIO 2: FSU and Michigan both win.
In this case it's FSU, Texas, Alabama, and Georgia, in that order. Four teams, two chairs. Sorry SEC.
- Michigan
- Washington
- FSU
- Texas
And now to consider the unlikely event of a Michigan defeat,
SCENARIO 3: FSU wins, Michigan loses.
With the Alabama win, the Texas > Alabama > Georgia relationship continues to hold.
- Washington
- FSU
- Texas
- Alabama
SCENARIO 4: FSU and Michigan both lose.
OK chaos fans! Which loser do you take for the last spot - Georgia or Michigan? IMO Georgia was sufficiently competitive to take it.
- Washington
- Texas
- Alabama
- Georgia
I am sure of this and this alone - each of these remaining scenarios will create controversy. All of the clearcut ones are gone, courtesy of Alabama.
I don't know who Fallica is but that was my prediction too.I agree with what Fallica said on Fox just now assuming Michigan wins. Michigan, Washington, Texas, Alabama.
If FSU can win big and demolish Louisville they may have a chance to sneak in at 4.
Washington is a lock, bud.I would have to think if FSU and Mich wins- it’s Mich/FSU/Bama/Texas
You would leave an unbeaten Washington out?I would have to think if FSU and Mich wins- it’s Mich/FSU/Bama/Texas
My bad- you are right. Brain fart.Washington is a lock, bud.
I am definitely rooting for FSU to lose because Texas and Alabama are way better, and there are only 3 playoff games and I don’t want 1 to be Michigan killing FSU.Two series in for the ACC championship - admittedly early- but from what I've seen if somebody thinks Texas wouldn't be the best team in the ACC I don't know what to say.
No, actually the initial CFP had Ga, OSU, Xichigan and FSU in order, all at 8-0. Wash was #5, rounding out the 5 remaining undefeateds.Assuming Michigan wins even if FSU gets in I don’t think they will get higher than a 4th seed.
I think they will be leaped by a 1 loss team like Texas and maybe Alabama too. In the initial CFP an undefeated FSU was seeded 3 behind 1 loss teams.
I’m talking about the 2014 CFP where 1 loss Alabama and 1 loss Oregon were ranked 1 an 2 over an undefeated FSU at 3No, actually the initial CFP had Ga, OSU, Xichigan and FSU in order, all at 8-0. Wash was #5, rounding out the 5 remaining undefeateds.
I don't see a scenario where the committee leaves out an undefeated Power conf winner for any one loss team. So IMO if FSU and Xichigan both win, I have to believe they're all in.
Oh, that was my mistake then. Isn't that a little different though? All those teams were in. We're looking at drawing the line between who gets in and who doesn't. Then again, FSU is only up 3-0 at the half, so anything can happen yet there, and I think everyone agrees they are out with a loss.I’m talking about the 2014 CFP where 1 loss Alabama and 1 loss Oregon were ranked 1 an 2 over an undefeated FSU at 3
The best teams are Texas, UGA, Alabama and Michigan.
Washington should have played somebody decent and ranked in the non-conference although I’m guessing beating Oregon twice will be enough to get them in. I’m thinking OSU would be a 3 point neutral field favorite vs Washington.
The best teams are Texas, UGA, Alabama and Michigan.
Washington should have played somebody decent and ranked in the non-conference although I’m guessing beating Oregon twice will be enough to get them in. I’m thinking OSU would be a 3 point neutral field favorite vs Washington.
They won't put Georgia in over Alabama. It would have to be at this expense of both FSU and TexasEveryone is saying it’s between
Michigan-Wash-FSU-Texas
And
Michigan-Wash-Bama-Texas
But don’t underestimate the committee finding a way to put Georgia in somehow
Because the SEC has done so poorly in the CFP to date.🤔😂 Fact is the SEC has won 6 of the 9 CFP championships.The real question here is whether the committee has the balls to shut the SEC out. This would be the time to do it. A case can be made for Michigan- Washington-FSU -Texas. 3 unbeatens and the 1 loss team beat Alabama in Alabama.
Yes, and that is a comparison of each team’s whole seasons. Why not use that whole season standard in every comparison?We aren’t saying OU is better than Texas because OU went on to lose more games.
I have no connection with the SEC. I know:To try and argue that a one loss Alabama team is better than the one loss Texas team they lost in their home stadium to by double digits is a total SEC bias distortion of reality.
Bama had the 4th toughest schedule and Texas the 14th. In my opinion that is not enough to overcome the head to head loss at home.Yes, and that is a comparison of each team’s whole seasons. Why not use that whole season standard in every comparison?
I have no connection with the SEC. I know:
Texas:
- 1 top 10 1-loss opponent
- 1 top 15 2-loss opponent
- 2 top 25 4-loss opponents
Bama:
- 2 top 10 1-loss opponents
- 1 top 15 2-loss opponent
- 1 top 15 3-loss opponent
- 1 top 25 4-loss opponent
I know which schedule I’d say was tougher to make it through with 1-loss.
No relevance to this yearBecause the SEC has done so poorly in the CFP to date.🤔😂 Fact is the SEC has won 6 of the 9 CFP championships.
In this format- it really should be a rule that an unbeaten Conf Champ of a P5 should never be jumped by a 1 loss team. I don’t think FSu is fourth best but, they beat everyone they played.
This should be the year SEC is out.
Not going to happen though.
Bama had the 4th toughest schedule and Texas the 14th. In my opinion that is not enough to overcome the head to head loss at home.
If Alabama can get in over Texas why can't Georgia get in over Alabama.That's the question and distinction.
"Head to head" is only relevant if teams are viewed as equal.
Overall - are Bama and Texas close enough?
I think they are for that head to head to matter. Alabama isn't the dominant team of the past and it is a "different" team from earlier in the season but that "different" team needed a 4th and 31 hail mary to beat Auburn a team that got trounced on its own field by NMSU the week before.That's the question and distinction.
"Head to head" is only relevant if teams are viewed as equal.
Overall - are Bama and Texas close enough?
If Alabama can get in over Texas why can't Georgia get in over Alabama.
Seeing that apparently head-to-head is not that important.
Texas beat Bama at Bama