Ahhh good ole contrarian NJH, welcome to the party. I didn’t realize a willingness to chuck shots made someone a worthy player. Simpson knocked down a big one and saved an embarrassing loss — tip of the cap, no one’s arguing that. But you cannot look at his body of work this season, or this game — and think it reflects well on him as a player. You mock citing shooting percentages, but do you realize how ATROCIOUS 32% is for a Power 6 guard — not to mention those numbers have come against a weak non-con
I know you just like hearing yourself talk, but my god man…give it up. You were wrong about this team being better than last year’s. Honestly impressive how you managed to work in a diss towards Spencer about him not demanding the ball and taking tough shots — just willingly ignoring his game winners last year, as well as his tenacity / will to win that this team so badly misses
32%.....that's your argument??? LOL....
I'll ask you again.....who do you see, with the ability to go get their own shot??
Here's the moving the goalposts.....I am actually holding Simpson to a higher standard and believe he can play or shoot better. But at the same time, you are clueless if you see this as any different from last years roster most of the season.
Are you asleep at the wheel??
Here are the 2 to 3 myths that got started last year, took on a life of its own and now I don't see anyone saying anything about them.....eventually, you will listen to what I post and it will register.
A) Myth #1.....Mawot Mag was the reason RU faltered down the stretch and his return would "change the dynamics of how we defend and rebound"...
I am not a math major, but I count 5 rebounds in 2 games. Is the defense for RU better when he plays?? Sure, it's better, but nothing that changes the dynamics on either end of the court.
2) Myth 2.....there needs to be a reduction in Hyatts minutes.....LMAO.....
There is literally one offensive shooter who has an idea what is a good shot or is willing to take tough shots. What I don't see are the (he's a sub 30% 3 point shooter for his career), but still see that debacle of a stat.
Why do I care about what a players shooting percentages are BEFORE, the player plays any games in a RU uniform?? Do I see gradual improved play, year over year??? YES.....do we still see fans lost in this discussion, still refusing to acknowledge that Hyatt is actually a good player.....yeah, but what else can I do, except post facts.
Myth # 3)......that RU doesn't run an offense.....this one is actually the all-timer, because the same fans complaining about recruiting, then turn around and blame the coach for the players lacking offensive skill or talent.
Watch games across conferences....offense is a matchup situation, where players target weaker defensive players to score. There are Ivy League and small conferences who have no choice but to run a detailed, limited offense, because they lack talent and can't score in the paint.
I have a couple of players who would be "classified" as offensive players.
Gavin Griffiths
Derek Simpson
J Mike Davis
Portions of Hyatt
An occasional post up by Cliff.
Where is this offensive skill set where players can drive, dribble, pull up for jumpers from Mag, Woolfolk, Chol, Palmquist....even Austin Williams, who's rusty, has some basic fundamentals, but even last year with Mulcahy, Spencer or Caleb, there wasn't this skill set that's seen on MOST power 5/6 rosters.
This isn't Geo, RHJ, Jacob Young folks....even players like Eugene, Mag and others were developed into players. If you can't drive as a forward or pull up AND shoot as a wing, it's kinda hard to run any offense. The staff covers up as much as they can, but most CBB is matchup based.
In any event, I'll let these myths die a slow death.....but it's kinda difficult to understand what fans actually watch.....do we have 7 to 8 players on our roster that automatically start or are in rotations at most Power 5 schools or B1G programs?? I count 4.