I don't think it'll matter much, but I do think it could be a tiebreaker if we're essentially tied in the eyes of the committe with some other team on the bubble. The committee obviously will know how that game was stolen from RU and I think would give us the nod if there's a tie situation. Same thing if we're tied for the last 10 seed for example with some other team - I think this "loss" would get us the nod. But I don't think it gets us in over some team that they think is slightly better than us without factoring in the OSU game.
Been saying this could help us slightly since the day it happened (at least a tiebreaker and as I said later, perhaps would move us 1-2 spots), as per my post above. Good to see it confirmed. It was always an absolute travesty and has fueled my thinking for months and especially the past few games that all we needed to do was get to 10-10 in the conference and we'd likely get in (possibly in Dayton, but in). I still believe that and this gives me a little bit more comfort in that belief. Hopefully we also get a little credit for the Temple loss being without 2 starters.
Of course, there was always the caveat that getting in would be a lot more likely if there weren't a bunch of bid stealers and we're off to a good start there with CoC and Oral Roberts winning their tourneys (OR ain't gonna lose up 30) and no chance of a theft in the WCC. Sure the bigger conferences all have chance of bid stealers, so we'll have to wait to see on that count. And, of course, beating UM eliminates any chance of us being left out, so that would be a much better way to get in.