If you said "I shared a G4 flight with a "connected" booster ...." there would be more credibility with the thread. Dude on PATH or NJ Transit train ain't cutting it.
As for Patrick not having spoken with Schiano (whether true or not we don't know), two things to consider: the first is that he's only been on the job two full days, and the second is that he hired an outside search firm to do the due diligence. I would doubt he would've spoken with anyone quite yet, but if he has it most likely would've involved Brown.
I respectfully disagree on Golden. He reminds me of Flood in a jacket and tie. I want someone who moves the needle and creates a buzz. Not sure Golden or Diaco do that.
Whats he got the Mario C doesnt? Wnhy would you take a guy who MIGHT prove to be a good HC and recruiter, when you can get a guy who has proven to be a good HC and recruiter?
If those names are any indication, then we wont be hiring someone who moves the needle. Thats just not hte price range that needle moving candidates live in.
No - I get how valuable political can be - but people tend to ignore the flip side - that politicians arent fans - they want something in return for their support (and also - a lot of money with an inexperienced manager isnt a great thing either - fortunately we had an actual professional on the job to reform the drparmtnet and create an atheltics master plan to guide the way I guess.)
And not post here ever again? For that alone, it's worth taking Diaco if he even wants the job.
Unless they are actually interviewing severla people including those guys and arent ready to make the decision yet.
Yes- I would consider taking a program that hadnt won before or since and winning is something. I dont know if I would say he has been a good HC - but I wouldnt say that Diaco has either - lets remember - Randy Edsall won their too.
So there is some sort of association between your son and a booster. Who are we hiring?
