This debate has one on now for over a year and won't die soon but in the end it comes down to one main difference and yesterday again showed that. The rest (what each would do as a leader if given the mantle by coach (and don't underestimate how reactions change to someone when they are named the starter), grasp of O, accuracy, performance under pressure and adversity-short or prolonged, etc) are points where arguments can be made for either. There is one topic that doesn't appear to be a real dispute however.
Rettig is a WEAPON-Laviano is not. That should be the decider. Their td's yesterday personified this. CL threw a screen and Grant ran it in about 30 yards. HR got 6 with one long pass, and is a risk to do so to the opposition on any play. CL creates no such risk to the opposition. CL completes the short ones, but we saw Rettig hit 6 or 7 in a row on one drive.
In looking at this team, there is no Carroo to the rescue. This team needs all the WEAPONS it can muster on O (I don't see an argument for a game manager). We saw a number of games in a row with no td passes (4?). Doesn't seem likely Rettig would produce that same result. I felt last year with how long he was out of fball HR needed a ton of meaningful snaps to get playing ready. He didn't get that and still needs to get out there in live situations if there's a chance at taking the weapon potential and making it work. Thus, with a need for game changers on O, Rettig's ability to be a weapon on any given play should tip the balance and give him a shot to make it work. Again, all the rest (while disputed) can be argued both ways, but whether or not one is a weapon for the O appears somewhat clear from the data we have. That's how I think it will and should end up.
Rettig is a WEAPON-Laviano is not. That should be the decider. Their td's yesterday personified this. CL threw a screen and Grant ran it in about 30 yards. HR got 6 with one long pass, and is a risk to do so to the opposition on any play. CL creates no such risk to the opposition. CL completes the short ones, but we saw Rettig hit 6 or 7 in a row on one drive.
In looking at this team, there is no Carroo to the rescue. This team needs all the WEAPONS it can muster on O (I don't see an argument for a game manager). We saw a number of games in a row with no td passes (4?). Doesn't seem likely Rettig would produce that same result. I felt last year with how long he was out of fball HR needed a ton of meaningful snaps to get playing ready. He didn't get that and still needs to get out there in live situations if there's a chance at taking the weapon potential and making it work. Thus, with a need for game changers on O, Rettig's ability to be a weapon on any given play should tip the balance and give him a shot to make it work. Again, all the rest (while disputed) can be argued both ways, but whether or not one is a weapon for the O appears somewhat clear from the data we have. That's how I think it will and should end up.