ADVERTISEMENT

The LB's in NWU game

yesrutgers01

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Nov 9, 2008
34,807
34,818
113
Hey All- Something that stood out to me during the game but I really have no explanation and hope someone else noticed and could fill me in.

Watching on TV- there was almost NO mention of any LB's until almsot the 4th Qtr when Powell and Turay were making significant plays.
I took this as a positive, as most years, it seems like th LB's have to be involved in every play. I also noticed NWU was not burning us on the play that always burns us- the slant over the middle. Were the LB's just taking that play away? And it seemed we never let the RB's get to the 2nd level.

So, my question is to those that watched closer- were the LB's quiet on TV because they and DL were excellent or was it because the LB's just were not active enough to be in every play? I thought it was the former and bodes very well for us.
 
The LBs looked pretty good to me. Powell was blowing plays up, Toure was pressuring. We bottled up their running completely -- i think their biggest run of the day was on a broken play when their QB scrambled.

Speaking of LBs -- Northwesterns LB's played really well. That group is probably their strongest (and has their captain). Without them, we probably beat Northwestern by 40.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sct1111 and thegock
The LBs played very well, especially Jennings and Powell. I thought the whole defense played well and is maybe why the LBs didn’t seem to stand out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yesrutgers01
As said above RU linebackers played well both in the run game and pass protection, NW linebackers were the strength of their defense and made a number of plays that kept the game from becoming a rout
 
The LBs looked pretty good to me. Powell was blowing plays up, Toure was pressuring. We bottled up their running completely -- i think their biggest run of the day was on a broken play when their QB scrambled.

Speaking of LBs -- Northwesterns LB's played really well. That group is probably their strongest (and has their captain). Without them, we probably beat Northwestern by 40.

Their LBs and CBs both. The DL was below the B1G standard. I doubt Temple is any better but something to watch later in the in-conference schedule as far as progress of the OL.
 
Their LBs and CBs both. The DL was below the B1G standard. I doubt Temple is any better but something to watch later in the in-conference schedule as far as progress of the OL.
Our DL was below? We got pressure with 4/5 against 7 consistently. They had to constantly double team a DE and a DT. We had sacks and QB hits from the DL. Our DL did not get pushed for field at all.
 
It felt like the defense was playing solidly overall as a unit, so the LBs didn't need to be called on to make great individual plays that would result in the announcers calling them out by name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yesrutgers01
Our DL was below? We got pressure with 4/5 against 7 consistently. They had to constantly double team a DE and a DT. We had sacks and QB hits from the DL. Our DL did not get pushed for field at all.
NWs DL
 
Our DL was below? We got pressure with 4/5 against 7 consistently. They had to constantly double team a DE and a DT. We had sacks and QB hits from the DL. Our DL did not get pushed for field at all.
You bring so much wisdom to this board.
Thanks.
 
Either because they wouldn’t or couldn’t, the middle of the field seemed to be off limits for the NU passing attack. I don’t think the LBs had much of an opportunity to do much given our DL play.

I also spent some time watching Holland Pierce pretty much have his way with whomever NU put across from him. He is a big man whose skill is starting to catch up with his size. In general the OL did really well in pass protection but I think about average in run blocking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU
Our DL was below? We got pressure with 4/5 against 7 consistently. They had to constantly double team a DE and a DT. We had sacks and QB hits from the DL. Our DL did not get pushed for field at all.

Their DL. Sorry for the confusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
The fact that that stats were shared by many is a good sign. When you have one person dominating the stat line is when there are deficiencies. The D played well as a whole.
LB's, DL and DE all contributed. Very impressed by Ahanotu, Bailey, Iton, Fletcher, Lewis and Hamilton. I saw them getting off blocks and being disruptive in the running and passing game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yesrutgers01
Ridiculous.
The D line is a strong unit only to improve throughout the season.

Anyone know the status of LB Walker ? Did not see him.
must have watched a different game or seen different practice

we'll see at end of year how stout that D line is
 
Either because they wouldn’t or couldn’t, the middle of the field seemed to be off limits for the NU passing attack. I don’t think the LBs had much of an opportunity to do much given our DL play.

I also spent some time watching Holland Pierce pretty much have his way with whomever NU put across from him. He is a big man whose skill is starting to catch up with his size. In general the OL did really well in pass protection but I think about average in run blocking.
Our running plays were vanilla.
 
must have watched a different game or seen different practice

we'll see at end of year how stout that D line is
What are you talking about? You seriously think our Dline is a weak point of our defense? How many sacks did we have? Tackles for loss? How many running yards did they have? How can you possibly watch that game conclude that our Dline is a weakness?

It's been discussed over and over again how our Dline is 10 players deep and is one of if not our best units on the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU and Kbee3
What are you talking about? You seriously think our Dline is a weak point of our defense? How many sacks did we have? Tackles for loss? How many running yards did they have? How can you possibly watch that game conclude that our Dline is a weakness?

It's been discussed over and over again how our Dline is 10 players deep and is one of if not our best units on the team.
see my previous post. you guys know more than the coaches too I see

Can't wait to see what you guys have to say when we actually play a somewhat competent team
 
Jennings, Powell, and Toure had 23 Tackles (11 Solo), 2 TFL, and 2.5 Sacks. Not exactly MIA
My OP wasn't to say they were missing in action, you just didn't hear them called out until late in the game- and when you are shutting out the other team, that is usually a good thing.
 
Ridiculous.
The D line is a strong unit only to improve throughout the season.

Anyone know the status of LB Walker ? Did not see him.
I didn't notice him either. But the official Rutgers site has him listed as "participating"....and credited with no tackles.
 
see my previous post. you guys know more than the coaches too I see

Can't wait to see what you guys have to say when we actually play a somewhat competent team
Greg literally said that it's 10 deep. You're getting confused with the OLine. He's consistently said that our Dline is one of our best and deepest units.

Our only preseason All Big Ten player is DE Aaron Lewis.

Our best position coach/recruiter is our DLine coach Watson.

Where at all did you see weakness on Sunday for our DLine?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT