I think you mean you are in the top 5%. If you were in the top .05%, you'd be one of the top 10 donors. The top 5% is in the top 1300.I have 191pp … based on what it says on the screen for how many donors there are I’m in top .05%
I think you mean you are in the top 5%. If you were in the top .05%, you'd be one of the top 10 donors. The top 5% is in the top 1300.I have 191pp … based on what it says on the screen for how many donors there are I’m in top .05%
The school might be asking for people to be pushed back a number of rows and then pay more for the honorRenderings showd students in first few rows of 111-116 - huge mistake if that comes to fruition. People pay a premium for those seats, and will pay more once the reno is finished in a few years
You don't need to be Cameron, Auburn, Michigan w/the seating like that.
Keep the kids behind the basket, put the student section closer to the floor like it used to be, expand out on the sides to allow more kids in, shrink the amt of room the band gets, and limit the amount of times (and amount of seats) GS gets for the football team
No 100s available, even single tickets
That doesn't make sense, but I think I know what you meant.You think it's insane to get rid of the RAC? By that measure, Duke should get rid of Cameron Indoor.
Was told the overall renewal rate was roughly 95%. Would imagine most of that 5% was from people in 200-300 level.There are always 100-level seats opening up. People move, die, or give up tickets for other reasons. But there are a lot more people interested in 100-level seats than there are seats available (especially when the team is good).
There are only 1600 seats in the 100-level. Some of those are reserved for the visiting school, our team/coaches, corporate sponsors, etc. Assuming 200 pre-reserved seats, that leaves 1400 seats available for individual fans.
If 10% of those become available each year, that is only 140 seats, or 70 pairs. That doesn't mean you need to be a top-70 donor to get 100-level seats; top-70 donors who want seats already have them. But you need to have a significant number of priority points to be on the top-70 of people asking for seats this year.
If you want 100-level seats, ask your R Fund rep what you need to do to get into those seats as they become available. (If you don't have an R Fund rep, and you are willing to open your wallet to get 100 level seats, then call the Development office and tell them you would like to talk to a rep about setting up a multi-year pledge to support Athletics.)
I’m gonna provide some reality to this nonsenseIts insane they havent jumped those prices by at minimum 2X. Theres a market for them at 3X the price
Agree 1000%Renderings showd students in first few rows of 111-116 - huge mistake if that comes to fruition. People pay a premium for those seats, and will pay more once the reno is finished in a few years
You don't need to be Cameron, Auburn, Michigan w/the seating like that.
Keep the kids behind the basket, put the student section closer to the floor like it used to be, expand out on the sides to allow more kids in, shrink the amt of room the band gets, and limit the amount of times (and amount of seats) GS gets for the football team
This x 10000I’m gonna provide some reality to this nonsense
This is the realty
You have 18 home games …and the average price is $87.50/each….
My seats are in row B, section 105….and I refuse to sell to enemy , (the people who know me will verify that ) but I pay attention to what the tickets are going in the afrrr market …
For 18 games …it’s $1575 for my ticket and SASF fee….let’s forget the extra I have to donate to get the priority points to keep my seats …and just focus on ticket sales
You have 6 games against the cupcakes and they will average $40-$45…$250
You have 6 games against the better couple of rhe out of confrnce games (let’s use wake as a comparasion …they will average $100…$850
Then for the top 6 big ten games , they will sell for like this
$125
$150
$175
$200
$250
$300
$1200
So you can get $2100 per ticket …or $115 per seat …BEFORE fees
And that doesn’t count the cost of my donation to keep the seats
The pricing is about right UNTIL the demand for the seats for the bottom 12 games is so high that they go for $100-$150 seat
Then it SHOULD be adjusted to market price (and I’ll gladly pay it because if their demand is so high , it means we are really really good )
But right now , the season tickets prices are not far out of reality ro what they would fetch in total on rhe after market
I have a single in 113 Row EThere are always 100-level seats opening up. People move, die, or give up tickets for other reasons. But there are a lot more people interested in 100-level seats than there are seats available (especially when the team is good).
There are only 1600 seats in the 100-level. Some of those are reserved for the visiting school, our team/coaches, corporate sponsors, etc. Assuming 200 pre-reserved seats, that leaves 1400 seats available for individual fans.
If 10% of those become available each year, that is only 140 seats, or 70 pairs. That doesn't mean you need to be a top-70 donor to get 100-level seats; top-70 donors who want seats already have them. But you need to have a significant number of priority points to be on the top-70 of people asking for seats this year.
If you want 100-level seats, ask your R Fund rep what you need to do to get into those seats as they become available. (If you don't have an R Fund rep, and you are willing to open your wallet to get 100 level seats, then call the Development office and tell them you would like to talk to a rep about setting up a multi-year pledge to support Athletics.)
I would think after renovation the athletic department can use that as an excuse to shuffle the deck and put people in 100s that are donating the most.
Terrible move if it happensThe school might be asking for people to be pushed back a number of rows and then pay more for the honor
Not good, if so
I respectfully disagree.That doesn't make sense, but I think I know what you meant.
My point is that it would be crazy to spend hundreds of millions of dollars renovating the RAC and keeping the same capacity rather than building new, increasing capacity and maximizing profitability.
I know that's not popular here, but it's realistic.
ExactlyI respectfully disagree.
First, I don’t think a renovation will cost “hundreds of millions” of dollars. Probably 75-100 million, tops.
Second, the renovations will CREATE a more profitable environment, as it will include club suites and a more modern concourse with much better concessions.
Third, you can’t just give away one of the best and most iconic home court advantages just to build a shiny new arena. The RAC is one of the most unique venues in the country from an architectural standpoint, and it’s the architecture that helps create the thundering noise in the building. But this type of arena cannot be built under modern building codes and ADA requirements, so we would lose what makes the RAC unique.
They can renovate the RAC, add the suites, add the concourse (and bathrooms!!), and hopefully add another 1,000 to 2,000 seats in the old section 118 and in the corners. And VOILA, we now have a 10,000 seat SNAKEPIT.
Here’s the questionI would think after renovation the athletic department can use that as an excuse to shuffle the deck and put people in 100s that are donating the most.
This, this and ONLY THIS!!I respectfully disagree.
First, I don’t think a renovation will cost “hundreds of millions” of dollars. Probably 75-100 million, tops.
Second, the renovations will CREATE a more profitable environment, as it will include club suites and a more modern concourse with much better concessions.
Third, you can’t just give away one of the best and most iconic home court advantages just to build a shiny new arena. The RAC is one of the most unique venues in the country from an architectural standpoint, and it’s the architecture that helps create the thundering noise in the building. But this type of arena cannot be built under modern building codes and ADA requirements, so we would lose what makes the RAC unique.
They can renovate the RAC, add the suites, add the concourse (and bathrooms!!), and hopefully add another 1,000 to 2,000 seats in the old section 118 and in the corners. And VOILA, we now have a 10,000 seat SNAKEPIT.
100%. The priority points formula created should do exactly what you say.Here’s the question
Wouldn’t the system be, who had the most priority points gets the seat?
If a fan has had continual seats since the 70’s, but donated just enough to qualify for those seats, he still had a ton of priority points, probably more than a large more recent donor
I could understand the university wanting to cater to a big donor now, but the system in place appears to be getting things by priority
I would hope they do not abandon that
I didn’t even get an offer to move down lower in 200s and I’m in top 3.5%. So there’s not many seats opening up. If renewals are 95% as someone mentioned and say 5000 seats are season tix, that’s only 250 seats with most much more likely to be 200-300 level.I think you mean you are in the top 5%. If you were in the top .05%, you'd be one of the top 10 donors. The top 5% is in the top 1300.
Yep, I think they'll likely do something like this...I would think after renovation the athletic department can use that as an excuse to shuffle the deck and put people in 100s that are donating the most.
Wait wut? We need to talk, lol...100%. The priority points formula created should do exactly what you say.
As a person who stopped donating to Rutgers 10+years ago I will understand when the deck is reshuffled and my cards aren’t great
I've been told definitely within five years.Do we have any idea when this might actually happen? I need to brace myself to get absolutely screwed
Yea I expected that, but have you been told anything about possible relocations?I've been told definitely within five years.
No... nothing about how they're going to handle those with season tickets.Yea I expected that, but have you been told anything about possible relocations?
Bullshit if they bump people from the seats they paid for over the years.I've been told definitely within five years.
Would be tragic if they bump a 40 year ticket holder for some new big donating applicantBullshit if they bump people from the seats they paid for over the years.
Teams will typically leave a certain amount for single game salesSomeone on TOS posted per their ticket rep we had 98% renewal rate and there won't be single game sales this year.
Not sure if that means we sold out on season tickets .... Or if not, whatever's left will be mini-plans.
You give them up you take your chances, no sympathy on this one sorry.Yes. Still I had 100s for years, including when I lived elsewhere. Gave them up for 2 years when I had a baby while living in Ohio then resumed and now can't improve and they don't give a hoot about 30 plus years of tickets since it is not every year.
If I am pushed back a few rows in the 100 section, I’d be in the lobby by the popcorn machine and I can’t see through the wall from there…That would suck.The school might be asking for people to be pushed back a number of rows and then pay more for the honor
Not good, if so
So what’s the lesson here? If you have great seats, hold onto them?Yes. Still I had 100s for years, including when I lived elsewhere. Gave them up for 2 years when I had a baby while living in Ohio then resumed and now can't improve and they don't give a hoot about 30 plus years of tickets since it is not every year.
Both.So what’s the lesson here? If you have great seats, hold onto them?
And priority points for football and hoops tickets reset to zero if you don’t renew in some fashion?
Mr. Magoo has enough vision issues as is!!If I am pushed back a few rows in the 100 section, I’d be in the lobby by the popcorn machine and I can’t see through the wall from there…That would suck.
I think the big takeaway here is that "rutgersfan1766" - a relentlessly positive guy who sees no evil, hears no evil and speaks no evil when it comes to any of the actions of the Rutgers administration "liked" that post - one that was rightfully critical of said administration.Understand that RU summarily executed an entire section that contained lifetime ticket holders when they moved on from 118. The way that was handled was abysmal.
I have a feeling nothing will be off the table, and no one will be safe from a ticket standpoint if and when the RAC gets a real once over.
They should refurbish the RAC, raise prices if necessary, but leave everyone where they areUnderstand that RU summarily executed an entire section that contained lifetime ticket holders when they moved on from 118. The way that was handled was abysmal.
I have a feeling nothing will be off the table, and no one will be safe from a ticket standpoint if and when the RAC gets a real once over.
$$$$$$They should refurbish the RAC, raise prices if necessary, but leave everyone where they are
Why move long term fans?
Because they can make more $$.They should refurbish the RAC, raise prices if necessary, but leave everyone where they are
Why move long term fans?
$$$$$$
here is my positionBecause they can make more $$.