Ha. Not going to waste my time. You are a Sit guy through and through. Now you are hiding from it and changing gears. Mostly you still haven't acknowledged the Vedral was hurt. You keep posting like he was benched. He wasn't. Wrong again for the 1000×
Nope. Check my Oct. 31 thread my man since you're an expert. Posted yesterday during first quarter that he was good enough to play if he had to as Schiano said post-game. They wanted to give Johnny and Art and look. Enjoy and get back on that Blue Bus out of campus hater!
Ok lets see next Saturday, thrilled that Gleason was able to maximize the strengths of the two we used last night. Great win, lets see who Schiano puts out there next week.
If I said that I would have said that clown. They used a mild injury to play guys they knew were ready. He could have played if he had to. Not a benching.
Of course he was banged up. When did I say he wasn't? I've said he could have played if he had to which Schiano said post-game.
Never play poker. When you start losing an argument you start with the name calling. A very bad tell.
Lol, I've been called so many names on here I've lost count. You just lie to try to back up an imaginary narrative. I recommend you change your handle to Red Bus and start over. Enjoy your Sunday. Go RU!
I didn’t say you did but the start of your sentence clearly makes it out that you can’t see why Sitkowski got the start. He started because Schiano and. Gleeson felt it best. The kid has improved and perhaps though he will never run like Vedral or even Langan can become a D1 QB here on the Banks. I’m not questioning a loyal son like you I ‘m frustrated that we still have people questioning every broken play and it seems they root against Sitkowski . I find that kind of strange.
Not to defend but he ‘s just telling it bluntly. Some here just hate to say maybe you are right. The same people have bashed Sitkowski before when he was the much ballyhooed frosh from Old Bridge . No way he should have been thrust into playing... not with the shat show Ash had as coaches... they let this kid take hit after hit and yet ...Sitkowski got up every time... then last year which was another disaster both fans and alums tried to castrate the kid....if Schiano felt that Sitkowski quit on the team last year he would either have transferred or he would never be in a game again. So just maybe we should grow the ?$&&) up.
Blunt is ok. Calling people clowns and other names is immature. He’d be better served being civil.
Thank you. All I'm trying to do. The great thing about this board is the different opinions, and not taking football too seriously. Only used the word clown and other silly names after I had been ridiculed and attacked a million times with much worse on here. Love our team and school! All good 👍🏼.
He can't be right when he constantly moves the goalposts and ignores the fact that Vedral was injured yesterday. Add in he went from saying the Sit was the man and changed his tune yesterday as the game played out and switched to Langan
You're seriously confusing me someone else man. Go back and check my posts starting on Oct. 31. I was ridiculed like I was an alien for suggested Langan should be playing over Vedral. Why would I make it up when you can check it? We can agree to disagree on football and still pull for RU 👍🏼.
The short answer is no, we can’t. Different teams present different challenges. Purdue is small up front and inexplicably runs a 3-4 defense. They are ripe for being bludgeoned to death by a stud like Langan. Michigan, no. Their horses up front are some big, fast cats. It’s no surprise the few snaps Langan had weren’t nearly as successful. But we were much more successful in the air. Their DBs were questionable. And Gleesons play calling kept them off guard all night.
This is such a silly debate. In no world should Langan be a full time starter over Vedral, who despite throwing into coverage in the Indiana( he was hit on throws) and Illinois games ( mid 3rd quarter on) , has made plenty of throws and played great against Michigan. Vedral gives you play action, read option , dimes to Melton , and except for some unsteadiness , decently accurate. The beauty is that Gleeson knows or at least is definitive when it is time for Langan or Sit to come in on several packages. It was obvious that we wore Purdue down and they knew it was coming with Johnny and they could not stop it , kinda like what Hansen of Michigan did to us the week before. We have 3 capable QBs which has never been a sentence uttered in Rutgers history and I have been watching since 1975. We also have an offensive coordinator that is scheming things up. Finally we have Schiano trusting Gleeson with the offense. A team and a coaching staff growing together. We are in good hands going forward. Stop the bullshit about which QB should be playing. You are not smart enough to make that decision and enjoy the wins and the competent coaching staff that was missing for the prior 4 years.
Am I? Below is your thread about dumping Vedral. 8 pages worth. Not 1 mention by you about Langan. You do bring up Art however. This is the most current thread of your "expertise" of QBs and you did not talk about Langan.
rutgers.forums.rivals.com
Man you are something else. The troll of the century. Stop lying and skewing facts. Here you go my man, from Oct. 31: https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/clear-cut-langan-should-be-starting-qb.203686/Am I? Below is your thread about dumping Vedral. 8 pages worth. Not 1 mention by you about Langan. You do bring up Art however. This is the most current thread of your "expertise" of QBs and you did not talk about Langan.
BTW Indiana won again. 5-1. Tied for 2nd best record in Big Ten. Wrong again!
You started this thread November 7th. You already had thrown Langan under the bus by then.
Vedral's Last Stand?
For those silly posters still basking in the glory of a 16-point loss to an ok Indiana team, Vedral needs to show something today. Bottom line. Coaches and players know what that means and he simply hasn't shown it to date. Schiano didn't bring him to RU just to simply be a placeholder. Yes, we...
[roll]
Was Johnny starting? Was Johnny even receiving reps? Was Johnny named team Captain? Did Johnny quit the day of a game when the team had game planned around him all week? Do you even know what the fvck you're talking about?
