Kentucky is one of the worst teams in the SEC right now. About to be 1-3 in the league.Even the worst teams in any league can catch fire and upset the favorite.
Slid under the radar with Malik Hall out. And AJ Hoggard is a great PG even though he can't shoot. Different styles but he's in that Zavier Simpson mold where he can't make 3s but is otherwise nails.Peeps are sleepin on Sparty..not only nationwide but on this board.
South Carolina doing their best to throw it away.Kentucky is one of the worst teams in the SEC right now. About to be 1-3 in the league.
They hung on...stunningSouth Carolina doing their best to throw it away.
Kentucky, football schoolThey hung on...stunning
They had 42 at the half in LexingtonSouth Carolina was coming off an 85-42 loss to Tennessee.
They're on scholarship too.They had 42 at the half in Lexington
My point being they scored as many in one half at Rupp as they did in the entire Tennessee game at homeThey're on scholarship too.
Yup but thankfully they ended up beating Tulsa... despite the ejections and Tulsa's 22-0 run to start 2nd half.Temple sucks
Major melt down ….that’s one they may regret in 8 weeks not finishing off ….Was Okie up 10 at Kansas?. A total meltdown in the last 4 minutes. The kind of win the Sooners needed
You keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.Temple sucks but they are winning 72-63 late
you are entitled to your opinionYou keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.
They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeksYou keep on stating your opinion and really come back to reality. They are 10-8 and 4-1 in second place in their league , are 3-2 on the road with another neutral court win over us. Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck. Teams that are 4-13 suck. You love crucifying Rutgers when they lose to teams that you say suck. You said Wake Forest sucked and was not good either. Your words no longer mean anything.
Temple really isn’t that bad. We had two starters out at a neutral site game. I’m over that game. More upset at SHU and Iowa.They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeks
They hung on...stunning
Another really good point. They have been playing without their center who ate us up for 5-6 games as well. With him they have a semblance of a low post game to go along with their 2 shooting guards. If their guards hit shots and hit 3’s they can give teams a game. If guards shoot like crap they can be blown out against a good team.They'll be better if they can get Reynolds back off of surgery in a couple weeks
I feel most here (including bac) are grading on the power conference curve. On that curve anything >100 definitely sucks.Sucks is normally reserved for 250-363 level teams. Temple is like a 125-150 team. They are not a good team but they do not suck.
This - or alternatively, the “no chance whatsoever for an at large bid” curve.I feel most here (including bac) are grading on the power conference curve. On that curve anything >100 definitely sucks.
How about Wake Forest? Do they suck too? Your defending of BAC is comical. Try using the English language correctly . So any team outside the top 100 sucks. So. Davidson is 160 in the NET and played Purdue to a 69-60 game sucks. I don’t think even BAC was saying teams outside Top 100 suck. You know what sucks , you injecting your stupid dumb opinion about teams that aren’t part of the Power 6 and act like you know anything about them. You probably didn’t know Temple has played without their center the last 5-6 games. Your post is a total fail.This - or alternatively, the “no chance whatsoever for an at large bid” curve.
Well Wake Forest is inside the top 100. Mediocre is probably a more appropriate descriptor.How about Wake Forest? Do they suck too?
Yes.Your defending of BAC is comical. Try using the English language correctly . So any team outside the top 100 sucks.
Yes.So. Davidson is 160 in the NET and played Purdue to a 69-60 game sucks.
I know they are bad by power 6 or NCAA tournament standards which is the only relevant measure around here. If we beat some D2 school I am also going to tell you they "suck" even if they are good by D2 standards. No one cares about that.I don’t think even BAC was saying teams outside Top 100 suck. You know what sucks , you injecting your stupid dumb opinion about teams that aren’t part of the Power 6 and act like you know anything about them. You probably didn’t know Temple has played without their center the last 5-6 games. Your post is a total fail.
Because you are relatively new around here. BAC has a tendency to never forgive Rutgers for losing to certain teams , Temple , St. Bonnie’s , Pittsburgh , etc. He then proceeds to call them trash or they suck even though some of those teams end up on the bubble at the end of the year or guess what , upset a higher rated team again later in the season. But there are circumstances and these are college kids and sometimes have bad games. Injuries are good excuses for other teams but never for Rutgers. So your opinion and explaination still sucks.Well Wake Forest is inside the top 100. Mediocre is probably a more appropriate descriptor.
Yes.
Yes.
I know they are bad by power 6 or NCAA tournament standards which is the only relevant measure around here. If we beat some D2 school I am also going to tell you they "suck" even if they are good by D2 standards. No one cares about that.
Why a couple posters are so defensive about teams from weak conferences is baffling to me.