Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure your point. All the transfers from schools with losing records appear to be Sophomores or Juniors on the list above (BC, Vandy, Pitt (if not losing, close to it)). All the transfers from the rest of the schools, that all had winning records, appear to be Freshman and Sophomores except for Juniors that left for the WNBA draft..Compare by schools with winning records versus losing records.
Compare by year in school.
Those who transfer from winning programs seem to be very different reasons for transfer from losing programs.Not sure your point. All the transfers from schools with losing records appear to be Sophomores or Juniors on the list above (BC, Vandy, Pitt (if not losing, close to it)). All the transfers from the rest of the schools, that all had winning records, appear to be Freshman and Sophomores except for Juniors that left for the WNBA draft..
The point is?
Do you mean playing time ?Those who transfer from winning programs seem to be very different reasons for transfer from losing programs.
No you cannot convince me that CVS is worth 750k per year.
We're number one at something with 4 ... bragging rights baby!!!!
Take her name recognition and her almost 1000wins and loose them.Do you mean playing time ?
I would like to see what you mean by : "Those who transfer from winning programs seem to be very different reasons for transfer from losing programs."
As for salary, like it or not CVS' name recognition still has value.
ok :pTake her name recognition and her almost 1000wins and loose them.
HC attitude toward playersok :p
now that that's settled , will you answer this : Do you mean playing time ? ( which I asked you before ) when you said : "Those who transfer from winning programs seem to be very different reasons for transfer from losing programs."
That happens at both winning programs and losing ones.HC attitude toward players
$750 k is way too much to pay for a hc whose record at the present time STINKS.There are lots things that you get away with when your are winning,but when you are a loser that no longer is happening .Her style of play is outdated and has not been updated.Her high school recruiting is not at the top 5% of womens hc.Her performance is far being at the top 5% of hc.Her methods methods of dealing with starting players stinks.I am totally against her getting $750k to be hc.That happens at both winning programs and losing ones.
The HC demands a certain style of play and gets on the players that aren't following directions.
Some might claim it's the coach's attitude, but it doesn't just happen at Rutgers or a program that had a losing record.
Some players in winning programs don't feel they are being treated right by the HC and transfer out, losing programs have the same problem.
So CVS isn't the lone ranger when it comes to her detractors trying to find a reason for transfers that can be used against her.
$750 k is way too much to pay for a hc whose record at the present time STINKS.There are lots things that you get away with when your are winning,but when you are a loser that no longer is happening .Her style of play is outdated and has not been updated.Her high school recruiting is not at the top 5% of womens hc.Her performance is far being at the top 5% of hc.Her methods methods of dealing with starting players stinks.I am totally against her getting $750k to be hc.
If Hobbs was going to do something this year, is it within the next week or so? If not, I hope he doesn't let her stay more than one more year.
Just to clarify - if you count last season only, then we have been passed by countless dozen's. Otherwise, it is an unpleasant - but not quite so ugly - picture.For once I agree with @RutgersDon (not with the delivery but with the message...). We have been surpassed by countless dozens, dozens more than some here want to admit, in the recent past. There is ZERO excuse for that and it ALL comes down on one person and one person only, in the end, and this sad quest for 1000 wins. I've always had mad respect for CVS, and ALL her and her program's great accomplishments since she arrived OTB, but the time for her to step down is now. She can continue on her quest for 1000 at countless #'s of schools, I'm sure, but it's just not working here anymore and, honestly, I think that's a damn shame.
IMO CVS has positive name recognition (big-time) w the media and the coaching world. But little w recruits and the recognition that is out there is not conducive to recruiting. Her H of F status means little to a top recruit as compared to the 6 win season. HS players live so much more in the present than the media and other coaches.Do you mean playing time ?
I would like to see what you mean by : "Those who transfer from winning programs seem to be very different reasons for transfer from losing programs."
As for salary, like it or not CVS' name recognition still has value.