Correct under the current rules you could end the first period tied with one guy having two takedowns and the other with one. Wrestler A- 2-takedown-2pts each for 4 pts, Wrestler B-2 escapes 1pt each and one takedown 2pts(and finish on top) score is 4-4. Too me that is wrong for Wrestler A.If they want to make a change just eliminate the escape point after a take down. You can earn escape points by choosing defense and that’s it.
It’s dumb that a take down, reversal, escape results in the same differential as a takedown and escape.
Also, depending on the timing/ride out, it’s possible to exit the first period tied with one guy having two take downs and the other guy having one. Seems kind of wrong.
i agree ... some om twitter are suggesting they should also make a reversal worth 3 - not sure I agree with thatCorrect under the current rules you could end the first period tied with one guy having two takedowns and the other with one. Wrestler A- 2-takedown-2pts each for 4 pts, Wrestler B-2 escapes 1pt each and one takedown 2pts(and finish on top) score is 4-4. Too me that is wrong for Wrestler A.
With new rule change of 3 pts per takedown....this scenario would be a 6-5 advantage for Wrestler A with the two takedowns. This seems better to me.
i agree ... some om twitter are suggesting they should also make a reversal worth 3 - not sure I agree with that
I also really like the no riding point without a turn ... would think it would cut down on the parallel rides