I'd like to see coach give Bullok some opportunities against the soft OOC foes.
I'd like to see Bullock give Bullock some opportunities against the soft OOC foes.
I'd like to see coach give Bullok some opportunities against the soft OOC foes.
raw deal
An instance of unfair or harsh treatment
Well ... Pikiell could have "the talk," and Bullock still wanted to stay - because he likes his teammates, and life as a student at RU. That is very possible. And his right, unless RU takes away his scholarship - which I suspect would not happen, based on a complex mix of reasons to which we as fans likely are not privy.
It is also possible we fans will never get to judge Bullock, since it is possible Bullock never actually sees game time - or only in extreme mop up time (which is no test at all).
I hope you are smarter than this post...I really do
I just think it's funny saying that us fans are giving him a raw deal because we are speculating he isn't good enough to play here and is a transfer candidate. We have zero affect if he plays and what happens to him. The data from his high school days and practice report tidbits suggest he'd be better off playing at a lower level. Id lobe to be wrong though.
Chop, what people on this board say has only influenced one thing--it gave Mulcahy cover to fire Gary Waters and try to gyp him out of the money RU owed him when zillions of new posters flooded the board with calls to fire Waters NOW and replace him with FHJ. It has been reported that players read this board, so posters might bear that in mind. But does it affect staff decisions? Highly doubtful.
TL
The issue with Bullock is how productive he could be playing limited minutes against power conference opponents.
I love the board experts who insist there is a hidden gem at the end of the bench. #freeRettig
#freeJakeDadika
#freeRocketWilliams
We don’t have to always be politically correct in our opinions. At least I thought this was America? Let’s call it what it is. When was the last time Rutgers was ever in a position to worry about the 12th and 13th scholarship on the roster? We never had that luxury in recent memory. The fact that we now are courting multiple 4 star players and there are a few players still visiting when we don’t have an immediate opening is brand new stuff for us. So that’s the only reason Bullock has been singled out. I don’t know anything about him but what I do know is that the Big 10 requires speed and athleticism that’s at a different level. Physically, it looks like guards would run circles around him but maybe I’m wrong? I think it’s simply the fact that there are potential recruits who could want to come and better our program and play. So of course we are discussing what we see or don’t see from Bullock. He’s been here for a year and if he decides to leave after this year for a chance to play; he’s had two full years of his education paid. I’m fine with seeing how he does if he gets on the court and our coaches will help him evaluate what he does from there. But again, it’s a numbers game and that’s why we are having this discussion. It takes a full roster to win in the Big 10 and that’s the goal, right?
Sensitive issue to discuss but for a program like Rutgers scholarships must be used wisely to improve league rankings and chances for winning seasons.Nailed it
This is new for us.
We aren't like UNC or Duke where there are 4 stars up and down the bench.
If we could add a 4 star (rare for us), or keep the 13th man on the bench, which is better for the program?
It's a no brainer.
Just need to figure out the best way to make it happen and not burn bridges (and help the kid out as much as possible, whoever that kid is.)
They shouldn't, but they do. Everyone reads the board.No active players should be reading a message board. The boards are for fans, not the players.
They shouldn't, but they do. Everyone reads the board.