Having read the full report I'm even more amazed at Flood's lack of sophistication and the implied finding that Flood lied about the conversation where the academic advisor told him not to contact the professor.
The "statement" that flood felt he needed to make, was not made to the administration, but to a lawyer interviewing him. It's unnecessary, but shows that between the first and second meeting he was counseled that he was in error and not to dig in further,
While things may go on at schools far worse, what I've seen in this report is not something I want for RU. We had been sold a bill of goods that we did it the right way and were different from others. Time to get back to striving for that.