ADVERTISEMENT

Willard Postgame Press Conference Today

Here's what he said, verbatim. Wow. "They would've went to the NCAA tournament last year if Mag doesn't get hurt...he's probably the best college defender I've seen in a long, long time...I mean he covers - he blitzes pick and rolls, he switches out on pick and rolls, if you get beat he's just there....Steve's a phenomenal defensive coach, but that defense is Mag and Mag alone, I mean that dude, he's just special." Maybe Hawk should watch this...
 
Here's what he said, verbatim. Wow. "They would've went to the NCAA tournament last year if Mag doesn't get hurt...he's probably the best college defender I've seen in a long, long time...I mean he covers - he blitzes pick and rolls, he switches out on pick and rolls, if you get beat he's just there....Steve's a phenomenal defensive coach, but that defense is Mag and Mag alone, I mean that dude, he's just special." Maybe Hawk should watch this...

@NewJerseyHawk thoughts on Willard comments re: Mag?
 
Mag played lights out vs Maryland but for the 100th time, he is not or was not the reason RU didn't make the NCAAs last year.

There's 30+ games in a season and players have great games, good games, so-so games and games where they don't play well at all. Mag is still a complimentary player that is slotted as the 5th scoring option on the floor. He had at least a dozen games before Michigan and Maryland to step forward and play lights out.

His play tonight and vs Michigan making plays and layups are HUGE, because RU hasn't been making layups OR shots at the basket or in the paint. No one ever questioned his willingness to hustle and defend but I can say that about a lot of the RU players. They all are willing defenders.

I do see what I see....and I see all 3 guards now getting Mag easier opportunities or layups in transition or conversions when plays need to be made. JWill, Simpson and Davis are now 3 players who are making plays and creating opportunities for Mag, Cliff and Hyatt to score. Mag, Cliff and Hyatt need to convert those plays, when presented.

It would be pretty clear (to me) that my point last year and this year in the last 2 games, that as the backcourt goes and generates plays, Mag and others benefit. It would be foolish to ignore what Jeremiah Williams and the guards have brought to the table to elevate the entire starting lineup and Mag.

Would I have changed my stance on Mag, if this type of play happened consistently in the prior dozen or so games?? 100%

Give credit to the playmakers and guards, which has been my point of view from the beginning on last years roster and this year's team as well.....it's the backcourt that is going to drive whatever success RU generates. Mag and others benefit from that and if the guards (Simpson, Davis and now JWill, with a mix in of Noah) then RU looks completely different. The backcourt with JWill is the difference folks, ignoring that would be kinda silly.
 
That was a very bold statement by Williard. I have been saying it for awhile that Mag was an incredible defender. He contorts his body like Gumby. The effort he gives every night should make him immune from criticism similar to the way Caleb played.
 
Mawot and Jeremiah! They give me hope for the rest of the season. I hope they both come back next year to help us have a leg it shot at a deep MM run.

PG - Dylan, JaMike
SG - Jeremiah, DSimp
SF - Mawot, Gavin
PF - Ace
C- Lathan/Wolf/Ogbole (Cliff? One can dream!)
 
Mawot and Jeremiah! They give me hope for the rest of the season. I hope they both come back next year to help us have a leg it shot at a deep MM run.

PG - Dylan, JaMike
SG - Jeremiah, DSimp
SF - Mawot, Gavin
PF - Ace
C- Lathan/Wolf/Ogbole (Cliff? One can dream!)
It’s been said many times that:
1. Cliff is absolutely not coming back - not worth a dream.
2. We will be hitting the portal hard for a legit center- my guess is that rhe NIL movers and shakers have put aside lots of bucks for that purpose.
 
Hawk will still say Mag isn't a B1G player but in essay form
Mawot Mag, while undoubtedly possessing certain skills and attributes on the basketball court, may not be considered a Big Ten player due to several key factors. Firstly, Mag's playing style and skill set may not align with the typical requirements and demands of the Big Ten conference. Secondly, his physical attributes and athleticism may not be at the level required to compete at the highest level within the Big Ten. Additionally, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be sufficient to thrive in the rigorous environment of the Big Ten. Finally, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge that may prove to be too formidable for Mag to overcome.

One reason why Mawot Mag may not be considered a Big Ten player is his playing style and skill set. The Big Ten conference is known for its physicality, defensive prowess, and emphasis on fundamental basketball. If Mag's strengths lie in areas such as finesse, perimeter shooting, or playmaking rather than in physicality, rebounding, and defense, he may struggle to make a significant impact in the Big Ten.

Another factor to consider is Mag's physical attributes and athleticism. The Big Ten conference is home to some of the most athletically gifted and physically imposing players in college basketball. If Mag lacks the size, strength, or athleticism to compete with these players, he may find himself overmatched and unable to assert himself effectively on the court.

Furthermore, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be extensive enough to prepare him for the rigors of the Big Ten. Players who excel in the Big Ten typically have a history of success in elite high school or AAU programs, as well as experience competing against top-tier competition. If Mag lacks this background, he may struggle to adapt to the heightened intensity and pressure of Big Ten basketball.

Lastly, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge. With perennial powerhouse programs such as Michigan State, Michigan, and Ohio State, as well as up-and-coming teams like Iowa and Illinois, the Big Ten is widely regarded as one of the toughest conferences in college basketball. If Mag is unable to consistently perform at a high level against this caliber of competition, it may be difficult for him to establish himself as a Big Ten player.

In conclusion, while Mawot Mag may possess certain skills and talents on the basketball court, there are several factors that may prevent him from being considered a Big Ten player. His playing style and skill set, physical attributes and athleticism, experience and track record, and the level of competition within the Big Ten all pose significant challenges that may prove to be insurmountable for Mag. Ultimately, whether or not Mag can overcome these obstacles and establish himself as a Big Ten player remains to be seen.
 
Mag played lights out vs Maryland but for the 100th time, he is not or was not the reason RU didn't make the NCAAs last year.

There's 30+ games in a season and players have great games, good games, so-so games and games where they don't play well at all. Mag is still a complimentary player that is slotted as the 5th scoring option on the floor. He had at least a dozen games before Michigan and Maryland to step forward and play lights out.

His play tonight and vs Michigan making plays and layups are HUGE, because RU hasn't been making layups OR shots at the basket or in the paint. No one ever questioned his willingness to hustle and defend but I can say that about a lot of the RU players. They all are willing defenders.

I do see what I see....and I see all 3 guards now getting Mag easier opportunities or layups in transition or conversions when plays need to be made. JWill, Simpson and Davis are now 3 players who are making plays and creating opportunities for Mag, Cliff and Hyatt to score. Mag, Cliff and Hyatt need to convert those plays, when presented.

It would be pretty clear (to me) that my point last year and this year in the last 2 games, that as the backcourt goes and generates plays, Mag and others benefit. It would be foolish to ignore what Jeremiah Williams and the guards have brought to the table to elevate the entire starting lineup and Mag.

Would I have changed my stance on Mag, if this type of play happened consistently in the prior dozen or so games?? 100%

Give credit to the playmakers and guards, which has been my point of view from the beginning on last years roster and this year's team as well.....it's the backcourt that is going to drive whatever success RU generates. Mag and others benefit from that and if the guards (Simpson, Davis and now JWill, with a mix in of Noah) then RU looks completely different. The backcourt with JWill is the difference folks, ignoring that would be kinda silly.
The insistence on downplaying Mag remains hilarious. He’s just a “willing defender”?? No, he’s one of the best defensive wings in the entire country and can guard 1-4. Offensively, you call him a 5th option. I’m not arguing that he doesn’t benefit from good guard play, but the guy scored 15 in a game where our guards racked up 4 assists total. He’s scored in double figures 8 out of the last 14 games. He was a crucial piece to last year’s team — is to this years team — and will be a key starter next year assuming he returns
 
Mag played lights out vs Maryland but for the 100th time, he is not or was not the reason RU didn't make the NCAAs last year.

There's 30+ games in a season and players have great games, good games, so-so games and games where they don't play well at all. Mag is still a complimentary player that is slotted as the 5th scoring option on the floor. He had at least a dozen games before Michigan and Maryland to step forward and play lights out.

His play tonight and vs Michigan making plays and layups are HUGE, because RU hasn't been making layups OR shots at the basket or in the paint. No one ever questioned his willingness to hustle and defend but I can say that about a lot of the RU players. They all are willing defenders.

I do see what I see....and I see all 3 guards now getting Mag easier opportunities or layups in transition or conversions when plays need to be made. JWill, Simpson and Davis are now 3 players who are making plays and creating opportunities for Mag, Cliff and Hyatt to score. Mag, Cliff and Hyatt need to convert those plays, when presented.

It would be pretty clear (to me) that my point last year and this year in the last 2 games, that as the backcourt goes and generates plays, Mag and others benefit. It would be foolish to ignore what Jeremiah Williams and the guards have brought to the table to elevate the entire starting lineup and Mag.

Would I have changed my stance on Mag, if this type of play happened consistently in the prior dozen or so games?? 100%

Give credit to the playmakers and guards, which has been my point of view from the beginning on last years roster and this year's team as well.....it's the backcourt that is going to drive whatever success RU generates. Mag and others benefit from that and if the guards (Simpson, Davis and now JWill, with a mix in of Noah) then RU looks completely different. The backcourt with JWill is the difference folks, ignoring that would be kinda silly.
Take your tons of words and endless paragraphs and eMail it to Williard.

Sometimes you are so obstinate. Strong people change their opinions when they are wrong. You are wrong.
 
Mawot Mag, while undoubtedly possessing certain skills and attributes on the basketball court, may not be considered a Big Ten player due to several key factors. Firstly, Mag's playing style and skill set may not align with the typical requirements and demands of the Big Ten conference. Secondly, his physical attributes and athleticism may not be at the level required to compete at the highest level within the Big Ten. Additionally, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be sufficient to thrive in the rigorous environment of the Big Ten. Finally, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge that may prove to be too formidable for Mag to overcome.

One reason why Mawot Mag may not be considered a Big Ten player is his playing style and skill set. The Big Ten conference is known for its physicality, defensive prowess, and emphasis on fundamental basketball. If Mag's strengths lie in areas such as finesse, perimeter shooting, or playmaking rather than in physicality, rebounding, and defense, he may struggle to make a significant impact in the Big Ten.

Another factor to consider is Mag's physical attributes and athleticism. The Big Ten conference is home to some of the most athletically gifted and physically imposing players in college basketball. If Mag lacks the size, strength, or athleticism to compete with these players, he may find himself overmatched and unable to assert himself effectively on the court.

Furthermore, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be extensive enough to prepare him for the rigors of the Big Ten. Players who excel in the Big Ten typically have a history of success in elite high school or AAU programs, as well as experience competing against top-tier competition. If Mag lacks this background, he may struggle to adapt to the heightened intensity and pressure of Big Ten basketball.

Lastly, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge. With perennial powerhouse programs such as Michigan State, Michigan, and Ohio State, as well as up-and-coming teams like Iowa and Illinois, the Big Ten is widely regarded as one of the toughest conferences in college basketball. If Mag is unable to consistently perform at a high level against this caliber of competition, it may be difficult for him to establish himself as a Big Ten player.

In conclusion, while Mawot Mag may possess certain skills and talents on the basketball court, there are several factors that may prevent him from being considered a Big Ten player. His playing style and skill set, physical attributes and athleticism, experience and track record, and the level of competition within the Big Ten all pose significant challenges that may prove to be insurmountable for Mag. Ultimately, whether or not Mag can overcome these obstacles and establish himself as a Big Ten player remains to be seen.
My nomination for the worst post of the decade.

Serious question…do you believe your bullshit or are you just trying to punk us?
 
Mawot Mag, while undoubtedly possessing certain skills and attributes on the basketball court, may not be considered a Big Ten player due to several key factors. Firstly, Mag's playing style and skill set may not align with the typical requirements and demands of the Big Ten conference. Secondly, his physical attributes and athleticism may not be at the level required to compete at the highest level within the Big Ten. Additionally, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be sufficient to thrive in the rigorous environment of the Big Ten. Finally, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge that may prove to be too formidable for Mag to overcome.

One reason why Mawot Mag may not be considered a Big Ten player is his playing style and skill set. The Big Ten conference is known for its physicality, defensive prowess, and emphasis on fundamental basketball. If Mag's strengths lie in areas such as finesse, perimeter shooting, or playmaking rather than in physicality, rebounding, and defense, he may struggle to make a significant impact in the Big Ten.

Another factor to consider is Mag's physical attributes and athleticism. The Big Ten conference is home to some of the most athletically gifted and physically imposing players in college basketball. If Mag lacks the size, strength, or athleticism to compete with these players, he may find himself overmatched and unable to assert himself effectively on the court.

Furthermore, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be extensive enough to prepare him for the rigors of the Big Ten. Players who excel in the Big Ten typically have a history of success in elite high school or AAU programs, as well as experience competing against top-tier competition. If Mag lacks this background, he may struggle to adapt to the heightened intensity and pressure of Big Ten basketball.

Lastly, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge. With perennial powerhouse programs such as Michigan State, Michigan, and Ohio State, as well as up-and-coming teams like Iowa and Illinois, the Big Ten is widely regarded as one of the toughest conferences in college basketball. If Mag is unable to consistently perform at a high level against this caliber of competition, it may be difficult for him to establish himself as a Big Ten player.

In conclusion, while Mawot Mag may possess certain skills and talents on the basketball court, there are several factors that may prevent him from being considered a Big Ten player. His playing style and skill set, physical attributes and athleticism, experience and track record, and the level of competition within the Big Ten all pose significant challenges that may prove to be insurmountable for Mag. Ultimately, whether or not Mag can overcome these obstacles and establish himself as a Big Ten player remains to be seen.
Possibly post of the month!!! Love it lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
it's called online classes
How does one attend an online class during the 9-10 hours it takes to travel by from Rutgers to EWR, by plane from EWR to LAX, then by another bus from LAX to UCLA or USC, and how does one attend the next day's online class the next day doing the trip in the opposite direction?
 
Mawot Mag, while undoubtedly possessing certain skills and attributes on the basketball court, may not be considered a Big Ten player due to several key factors. Firstly, Mag's playing style and skill set may not align with the typical requirements and demands of the Big Ten conference. Secondly, his physical attributes and athleticism may not be at the level required to compete at the highest level within the Big Ten. Additionally, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be sufficient to thrive in the rigorous environment of the Big Ten. Finally, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge that may prove to be too formidable for Mag to overcome.

One reason why Mawot Mag may not be considered a Big Ten player is his playing style and skill set. The Big Ten conference is known for its physicality, defensive prowess, and emphasis on fundamental basketball. If Mag's strengths lie in areas such as finesse, perimeter shooting, or playmaking rather than in physicality, rebounding, and defense, he may struggle to make a significant impact in the Big Ten.

Another factor to consider is Mag's physical attributes and athleticism. The Big Ten conference is home to some of the most athletically gifted and physically imposing players in college basketball. If Mag lacks the size, strength, or athleticism to compete with these players, he may find himself overmatched and unable to assert himself effectively on the court.

Furthermore, Mag's experience and track record in high-level competition may not be extensive enough to prepare him for the rigors of the Big Ten. Players who excel in the Big Ten typically have a history of success in elite high school or AAU programs, as well as experience competing against top-tier competition. If Mag lacks this background, he may struggle to adapt to the heightened intensity and pressure of Big Ten basketball.

Lastly, the level of competition within the Big Ten conference itself presents a significant challenge. With perennial powerhouse programs such as Michigan State, Michigan, and Ohio State, as well as up-and-coming teams like Iowa and Illinois, the Big Ten is widely regarded as one of the toughest conferences in college basketball. If Mag is unable to consistently perform at a high level against this caliber of competition, it may be difficult for him to establish himself as a Big Ten player.

In conclusion, while Mawot Mag may possess certain skills and talents on the basketball court, there are several factors that may prevent him from being considered a Big Ten player. His playing style and skill set, physical attributes and athleticism, experience and track record, and the level of competition within the Big Ten all pose significant challenges that may prove to be insurmountable for Mag. Ultimately, whether or not Mag can overcome these obstacles and establish himself as a Big Ten player remains to be seen.
Imagine writing all this to be completely wrong. Did he steal your lunch money?
 
Mag played lights out vs Maryland but for the 100th time, he is not or was not the reason RU didn't make the NCAAs last year.

There's 30+ games in a season and players have great games, good games, so-so games and games where they don't play well at all. Mag is still a complimentary player that is slotted as the 5th scoring option on the floor. He had at least a dozen games before Michigan and Maryland to step forward and play lights out.

His play tonight and vs Michigan making plays and layups are HUGE, because RU hasn't been making layups OR shots at the basket or in the paint. No one ever questioned his willingness to hustle and defend but I can say that about a lot of the RU players. They all are willing defenders.

I do see what I see....and I see all 3 guards now getting Mag easier opportunities or layups in transition or conversions when plays need to be made. JWill, Simpson and Davis are now 3 players who are making plays and creating opportunities for Mag, Cliff and Hyatt to score. Mag, Cliff and Hyatt need to convert those plays, when presented.

It would be pretty clear (to me) that my point last year and this year in the last 2 games, that as the backcourt goes and generates plays, Mag and others benefit. It would be foolish to ignore what Jeremiah Williams and the guards have brought to the table to elevate the entire starting lineup and Mag.

Would I have changed my stance on Mag, if this type of play happened consistently in the prior dozen or so games?? 100%

Give credit to the playmakers and guards, which has been my point of view from the beginning on last years roster and this year's team as well.....it's the backcourt that is going to drive whatever success RU generates. Mag and others benefit from that and if the guards (Simpson, Davis and now JWill, with a mix in of Noah) then RU looks completely different. The backcourt with JWill is the difference folks, ignoring that would be kinda silly.
This is a peak Hawk post, basically proving Scangg's point from a few posts above it. This board can be so entertaining, and it is free! What a deal!

If there was a multiverse, in how many universes would last year's team NOT have made the NCAA if Mag hadn't been injured? I'd say that number is close to zero. Yes, others could've stepped up (last minute of Minnesota had some blame to go around as we collectively panicked).

I will take Willard's opinion on this one. When Mag is on, he is one of the best defenders out there - period. **edited to add - our defense is NOT Mag and Mag alone. Cliff on the back side, combined with Williams, Davis, and Simpson, have a whole lot to do with how good our defense is.
 
You are clueless about basketball and nominated for worst post of the decade.

Congratulations!
Joking Just Kidding GIF
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT