When the starter is so obviously terrible, it is hard to phathom that the rest of the QB's are worse. Why not give a kid a shot in a game and see what happens? Lose 85-0 instead of 78-0? There are players that don't practice well, but win actual games. If the starter is serviceable, I completely agree with your point of view.
But when the starter is not moving the team… the laptop experts say he is “ so obviously terrible” but perhaps it is because the rest of the offense is completely failing in doing it’s job , making it impossible for the QB to do anything. …. It is rarely clear to the laptop experts that this is the problem … and the claim from the message board coaches is that it is always the QB that is performing horribly. The Coaches have the advantage of reviewing game tape and analyzing the performance of every players role on the offense and seeing why things are breaking down for the QB. If my coaches have made an assessment that one QB is clearly better than the other, why would I want them to put the #2 guy in, when the rest of the offense is failing miserably to do its job. Doesn’t make any sense. And Laviano had shown himself to be capable in games where the rest of our offense was not so overmatched ( ie. Indiana / and other lesser teams)
Just look at Bolin’s stats from his Louisville days… with a better group of players around him and compare it to his stats so far with the RU offense that Laviano was basically playing with last season. I think you will see Bolin’s stats this year will likely not measure up to what he has done at UL.