Rutgers beat Wisconsin...does that mean Rutgers is better than Wisconsin? Obviously not.Originally posted by bac2therac:
who is putting a lot of stock in a game here or there. Obviously you must balance some of the regular season with the tournament results. If you get two schools to the Final 4 yeah that matters...and one of them was a 4th/5th place Big 10 school against one of the top ACC schools. Then the top Big 10 school took out ACc #3. So yes head to head in the tourney is factored in.
Lets face it Rutgers was atrocious this season yet still went out and won at Clemson. The Big 10 ten won the series overall 8-6 led by much of the second tier of the league. The ACC elite beat the Big 10 elite at the start of the year but look who is winning now...and of course still a couple of games to be played that could sway supremecy to one or another...I mean if its Wisky vs Michigan State in the finals are you see still going to hear arguments about the ACC being better than the Big 10
Again, people are putting too much stock in one game by each team (the challenge)..without looking at the overall picture. Still think Clemson overall was better than Rutgers.