Well, I'm saying a lot of things (not all toward you specifically):
(1) Hurley saying the Big East is the strongest because xxxx is the same as Pike saying the Big Ten is the strongest because yyyy. Neither of them have analyzed this they are just hyping up their conferences. I'm fine with this but it's weird to me to say it's somehow bad for Pike to do it but good for Hurley to do it.
(2) Hurley's specific argument is stupid. "Which conference contained the champion?" is basically useless when comparing one larger group of teams to another larger group of teams.
(3) No one can agree on what exactly it means to have a "strong" conference which goes back to #1 (a bunch of coaches can coachspeak their conferences up, who cares?).
(4) To the extent that people CAN agree on what it means, and actually measure it, the Big Ten has been stronger recently than the Big East, though probably neither have been the best which has been the B12, and they are both good, strong conferences. To that point:
Torvik rankings
2020 B10 #1, BE #2
2021 B10 #1, BE #5
2022 B10 #2, BE #4
2023 B10 #2, BE #3
2024 B10 #2, BE #3
Massey ratings
2020 B10 #1, BE #3
2021 B10 #1, BE #5
2022 B10 #2, BE #4
2023 B10 #2, BE #3
2024 B10 #2, BE #3
Sagarin
I can't find historical but last year he had B10 #2 and BE #3.
You will notice in this sample that the B10 is ahead of the BE every single time.
(5) People here have a really weird obsession with:
(i) Denegrating our own conference
(ii) Felating Dan Hurley