While I believe Vanderbilt, Baylor, San Diego State, Utah State, and West Virginia are IN the field and none true bubble schools, it would not shock me if one of them was left out of the field. Committee always good for a curveball.
I cannot see Texas in the field.While I believe Vanderbilt, Baylor, San Diego State, Utah State, and West Virginia are IN the field and none true bubble schools, it would not shock me if one of them was left out of the field. Committee always good for a curveball.
I think they’ll put Michigan or Maryland as the 4 in the east.i dont see St Johns getting that 2 seed in Newark
would you like this one
1. Duke
2. Michigan State
3. Kentucky
4. Arizona
No. Carolina and Texas should be out. Leaves 2 bids for 3 schools baring any bid stealers. However we all know how these NCAA committees work as they love the blue bloods.Morning Update
2 bids up for grabs...5 schools
INDIANA
XAVIER
BOISE STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
TEXAS
One bid stealer left in the AAC....UAB
VCU will be thrown into the at large bubble mix list if George Mason wins the A10 tourney.
IMPACT GAMES
IVY
Cornell/Yale meet in the Ivy tourney final.
ATLANTIC 10
George Mason/VCU meet in the A10 tourney final. VCU will get thrown into the at large bubble pool if they do not beat George Mason. I think though VCU has less than 50/50 odds of being selected as an at large. George Mason has no legitimate at large hopes and must win the Atlantic 10 tourney.
SEC
Tennessee/Florida meet in SEC tourney final. Its very late in the game. IMO I think Florida has wrapped up this one seed regardless of the outcome but still will consider a Tennessee win and possible contigency bracket
AAC
UAB/Memphis meet in the AAC tourney final. Memphis is locked into the field already as a possible 7/8 seed regardless of the outcome. UAB represents the sole potential bid stealer left on Selection Sunday and would remove an at large spot currently available. The committee will have a contigency bracket at the ready as the American final will not end until sometime around 5PM.
BIG 10
Michigan/Wisconsin meet in the Big 10 tourney final. Michigan is straddling 4/5 and Wisconsin 3/4. Game will end at 5:30 or so, a contingency bracket could be waiting but its likely the committee has already settled on their seeding. Do not think the result will significantly matter for either school.
Exactly. Always amused when bracketologists would claim CBS had no influence.I think they’ll put Michigan or Maryland as the 4 in the east.
Always fun to see if the committee “coincidentally” creates some interesting storyline matchups such as
St John’s-Louisville round 2?
Danny Wolf vs Yale in round 1?
Bruce Pearl vs Illinois in round 2?
Indiana v UNC in first 4?
the non conference sos is not 349, its 287 but point made anyhowI cannot see Texas in the field.
15 losses with the 349th non-conference SOS.
That should be disqualifying. The committee has always made a point out of non-conference scheduling.
If Texas played any sort of decent non-conference schedule, they’d be under .500.
They couldn’t even beat Ohio State on a neutral
What I don't understand about this or the Duke-St Johns proposal, with there being two #1 SEC seeds and two #2 SEC seeds, wouldn't each region need to have one SEC team as a 1 or 2 seed in order to avoid having SEC teams as the 1 and the 2 in the same bracket? Or does that type of thing not matter anymore?i dont see St Johns getting that 2 seed in Newark
would you like this one
1. Duke
2. Michigan State
3. Kentucky
4. Arizona
The first 4 teams from a conference should be placed in different regions as long as they are all top 4 seeds...the committee is allowed to relax that rule if additional teams from that conference appear as top 4 seeds (which will happen today), however I'd definitely expect us to see them stick to this principal and separate Auburn/Florida/Tennessee/Alabama into 4 different regions.What I don't understand about this or the Duke-St Johns proposal, with there being two #1 SEC seeds and two #2 SEC seeds, wouldn't each region need to have one SEC team as a 1 or 2 seed in order to avoid having SEC teams as the 1 and the 2 in the same bracket? Or does that type of thing not matter anymore?
St John's isn't going to be put in advantage at being the home team at the expense of a 1What I don't understand about this or the Duke-St Johns proposal, with there being two #1 SEC seeds and two #2 SEC seeds, wouldn't each region need to have one SEC team as a 1 or 2 seed in order to avoid having SEC teams as the 1 and the 2 in the same bracket? Or does that type of thing not matter anymore?
CorrectThe first 4 teams from a conference should be placed in different regions as long as they are all top 4 seeds...the committee is allowed to relax that rule if additional teams from that conference appear as top 4 seeds (which will happen today), however I'd definitely expect us to see them stick to this principal and separate Auburn/Florida/Tennessee/Alabama into 4 different regions.
Good luck. You submitting to the matrix again?My final field is close to being complete. Just waiting on the AAC result
Why would you believe that? There is nothing stopping it, they've done it before, and their goal is to get teams close to home.St John's isn't going to be put in advantage at being the home team at the expense of a 1
Yes but I’m saying they are going to be the 2 seed with a sec 1 regardless of location. And Michigan state will be also. Duke will get either bama or Tennessee.St John's isn't going to be put in advantage at being the home team at the expense of a 1
Because it won't happen in this caseWhy would you believe that? There is nothing stopping it, they've done it before, and their goal is to get teams close to home.
Note that I wouldn't expect it to happen if Duke ends up in the East, since I expect them to get an SEC team in the two line with them.
How the committee thinks not what I think but based on their principles. Takes a lot of prep work a good deal of guesswork.some you get right some wrongQuestion, when you do your bracket, which plays a bigger part in your mindset for your own bracket selection, picking the teams you think the Committee will pick or picking the best at large teams that are most deserving based upon your evaluation? I’ll give an example of what I mean, just using North Carolina as an example, if you had NC as being out based upon your full resume evaluation of the potential field, would you still possibly put them in your bracket if you felt strongly the committee was going to include them?