ADVERTISEMENT

Bacatology 3/3: NCAA Tournament Analysis

Drake survives scare from Belmont to reach MVC finals. That sigh of relief you here is from bubble schools all across the globe
 
Indiana wins 66-60. Up to 19-12 but with Ohio State possibly out of the field, the Hoosiers have just 2 wins vs the field...2 very good wins at Michigan State and Purdue. 4-12 is really ugly but still says no loss outside Q1. Q1/2 is 9-12 which is pretty solid and Q/1/2/3 at 14-12 is very good around the bubble. Its more what they havent done wrong than what they did. I will note they have nothing ooc..just a Q2 win over Providence. I am going to take back what I said earlier...they are not a lock but in for now and if no bid stealers could be alright...still may be in first four games. They likely get Oregon in first Big 10 tourney game. Tough spot to expect a win but a win there would be a big help.

Ohio State is in trouble. At just 17-14 they will almost certainly get a 15th loss. Only 3 schools have ever got bids with 15 losses...all in the past decade but none in the past 5 years. OSU doesnt have the overwhelming profile to support that..certainly not at 17-15 but maybe not even at 18-15. 11-14 vs Q1/2/3 is a big red flag despite the solid 6-11 in Q1. Only 3 wins vs the field...at Purdue, Kentucky and Maryland if you dont include Texas and was swept by Indiana. Will conference tourney results matter? If they do getting to 19-15 or better is mandatory meaning they will need to beat whoever the 15th seed is AND the likely 7 seed Illinois at minimum.
 
SMU loses at Florida State, just a Q2 loss but at 0-4 in Q1 and 6-9 in Q1/2 and I dont give a shit they won 11 Q3 games, they do not have one damn win over a school in the field
 
  • Like
Reactions: FastMJ
Xavier beats Providence to finish at 13-7 in the Big East and will play Marquette in their opening game.

Even though they are 1-9 in Q1, their Q2 mark of 8-1 brings them up to 9-10 Q1/2 and they are 14-10 Q1/2/3 which is very strong. 3 wins vs field..at Marq, UConn, Creighton

Do they have to beat Marquette or are they in before the BE tourney.

As of now I have them IN replacing Ohio State.
 
Oklahoma wins at Texas.

Longhorns down to 17-14 and now out of the field. Not sure they can get back in even with a deep run in the SEC tourney.

Oklahoma at 19-12 would appear close to a lock but stopping short of saying it

We shall see tomorrow who slides in as the last team in...might be a surprising choice
 
Baylor loses a close one to Houston. At 17-13 I am not sure just how safe the Bears truly are. Still in the field for now.
 
Omaha is dancing for the first time ever as the Summit League AQ. Tge final hasn't been played yet but St Thomas their opponent is ineligible for the NCAA tournament due to the transition wait out period
 
I don't think the selection committee will be waiting
That's what I want to know. Even though they apparently have it done before tourneys now the announcers continues to talk about performance in the league events a consideration and factor. Probably not so true but would they have special "holds pending" for teams the blue bloods?
 
That's what I want to know. Even though they apparently have it done before tourneys now the announcers continues to talk about performance in the league events a consideration and factor. Probably not so true but would they have special "holds pending" for teams the blue bloods?
They'll decide North Carolina by Friday pending potential bid stealers
 
Michigan State laying a hammer to Michigan up 20-6 early.

Michigan seeding heading to a 5...outside possibility they even slip to 6
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
Michigan State laying a hammer to Michigan up 20-6 early.

Michigan seeding heading to a 5...outside possibility they even slip to 6
Michigan will be lucky to get a 6.

I think we could be a 7 if we take two straight blowouts.

I get the overall resume is stronger than most in that range (no bad losses, half the schedule against Q1, great road record) but if we lose four straight to end, with 3 of them as blowouts, the efficiency metrics could be used to justify a lower seed than the resume suggests
 
Michigan will be lucky to get a 6.

I think we could be a 7 if we take two straight blowouts.

I get the overall resume is stronger than most in that range (no bad losses, half the schedule against Q1, great road record) but if we lose four straight to end, with 3 of them as blowouts, the efficiency metrics could be used to justify a lower seed than the resume suggests
No worse than 6...its not like these are losses to bad teams

You are overreacting

Body of work

9 Q1 wins and 20 Q1/2/3 wins
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT