well 2 of oklahomas Q1 wins are to central florida and cincinnati...two teams that are mediocre...cincy with the inflated net number with a weak ooc scheduleI didn't realize Oklahoma literally had no non-Q1 losses.
Makes me agree with Clemson's coach. I think NET itself isn't supposed to be used to analyze a team (to do so would be tantamount to rewarding shooting percentage and margin of victory), but it can easily be gamed on the conference level.
If a conference basically collectively decides to all schedule light and beat up on teams, then every win or loss is a Q1 or Q2 win lol. Although I can't really tell how much more the Big 12 does or can do this relative to other power conferences.
ACC Coach Believes Big 12 Teams 'Manipulated' NET Rankings
Did Big 12 basketball teams game the system to improve NET rankings? One coach from the ACC believes they did.kslsports.com
yes there are schools gaming the system and the big 12 certainly did this in concert with one another