UConn - Marquette... Tied at the half. I'm actually rooting for UConn to get a 3 seed
BACATOLOGY: 3/6 NCAA TOURNAMENT ANALYSIS***RUTGERS PROJECTED 11 SEED***
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
Starts at 11 mins. Didnt know we were 12-14 if u take out q4
Yes..and its a bad number
Lol...he never said dayton is definite
Thats the thing you keeps misinterpreting his words
Not all Q3 losses are equal. Three of our 4 are barely Q3 losses:
- SHU is #78 vs. the range of 76-160 for a Q3 home loss (and it was a rivalry game)
- Temple is #120 vs. the range of 101-200 for Q3 neutral loss (and we were missing 2 starters, so I would imagine the Committee does something like moving that to a Q2 loss, vs. completely ignoring it)
- Nebraska is similar to SHU, i.e, #94 vs. the range of 76-160 for a Q3 home loss
- Yes, MN is a bad Q3 loss, but IMO, it's our only truly "bad" loss all year, at #221 vs. the range of 136-240 for Q3 away losses.
I know that but its still an outlier compared to rest of bubble besides Clemson
Remember alot of these guys hate Rutgers for some reason i have no idea why
Rutgers now in 101 of 108 brackets on matrix
i dont see much on their schedule to make MSU a lock and especially around 7 where i saw them earlier (i guess before OSU loss). not arguing with you..just not seeing it even though thats what everyone is saying.
I think it’s ridiculous that 7 have them out.
Same reason we want Memphis. A&M and UCF could steal bids (unlikely I know)
@bac2therac - first off, greatly appreciate all you do, hope somehow you are getting a NIL deal for all this.
2 questions:
A) Does the fact that we have now been to 3 tournaments in a row, and that Pike is a fairly well known commodity, influence the committee. I seem to remember a few years where Mich St got selected based on the Izzo factor, not that Pike has that kind of clout
B) Apologies if I missed this, but do you think PSU is in no matter what happens against Northwestern. I think THEY are the team that no one should want to face in the tournament.
Thanks again !!
2 questions:
A) Does the fact that we have now been to 3 tournaments in a row, and that Pike is a fairly well known commodity, influence the committee. I seem to remember a few years where Mich St got selected based on the Izzo factor, not that Pike has that kind of clout
B) Apologies if I missed this, but do you think PSU is in no matter what happens against Northwestern. I think THEY are the team that no one should want to face in the tournament.
Thanks again !!
Palm, Palm, Palm, Palm, Palm, Palm, and Palm.
That blowhard is worthless
Anyone see the aac game this afternoon between temple and cinncy. You could have fit the amount of fans there on a school bus with room to spare. Thank God we made it to the B1G.
I assumed they actually did something like that, which would be easy to do, and that the quads were simply a way to represent the relative breakdown of "rated" games on one sheet.
Refs are screwing up another good game between PSU-NW
Terrible call there to grant that timeout with 2 NW players with their hands on the ball. That's a jump ball all day and it would have been NW ball
True, but all I care about is the Committee and I'm sure they will take the type of Q3 losses into consideration (and the OSU game in some small way) and presumably they don't hate any team.
Penn state was above Rutgers coming into tonight and now have and outside shot as a 9 seed
Anyone asking why PSU is/was ahead of Rutgers…there’s your answer
Should have put the rebound back up to tie the game..
Penn St was probably ahead of us in the field anyway. They are a 10 now. We will get the byed 11..
Nothing changes with this
Penn St was probably ahead of us in the field anyway. They are a 10 now. We will get the byed 11..
Nothing changes with this
Similar threads
