BACATOLOGY: NCAA ANALYSIS 3/7......NEW UPDATE 3/12 1PM PAGE 37
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
What is the meaning then to a senior laden power conference school that just barely misses the NCAA tournament?
You are attributing your meaning and think that others should feel the same way
Maybe to the 7th team in the Mountain West it may mean a lot
You are attributing your meaning and think that others should feel the same way
Maybe to the 7th team in the Mountain West it may mean a lot
What happened this morning. We were an 11 and maybe a 12 on a lot of sites and now we’re lucky to get Dayton. Literally what happened? We’d smoke a lot of these teams.
should we take all our “meaningless” bowl “banners” from SHI?
The NIT is like a bowl game for the teams that miss out on the 40 or so regular bowls
Are you guys out of your mind? What if we don't make the tournament the next three seasons? In that case the NIT would be the career highlight for Jalen Miller. You don't take that away from him or any of the other players.
I can't possibly fathom thinking Rutgers is too good for the NIT.
I can't possibly fathom thinking Rutgers is too good for the NIT.
I'm sure Jalen will get over not playing Akron in front of 1000 fans
Respectfully, what is a better argument from a recruiting standpoint?
We made the final four of the NIT or We made the NCAA's for three years in a row.
Just my opinion but I think recruits want to hear tourney.
Ultimately I think our 12-8 conference record gets us In. The win over Indiana now becomes bigger
Not true at all lol
if we win the play-in sure…no argument.
I don’t believe making a playin game in Dayton and losing is making the ncaa tournament. That’s why it’s called a “play in” game…to play into the torunsment.
playing in MSG in any tournament is better than losing a game in Dayton. It’s not even a question. Imo
If we go to Dayton. We aren’t losing that game. We’d be playing at 110% intensity. We’d make it through.
They consider our performance against those teams
I disagree. The NCAA considers the play in games as actual tourney games. They pay the same as any other game.
Also I say this without doing the research, but I would assume the play in game on a Tues/Wed night will draw much higher rating than the NIT final 4 games.
So yes, I would rather make the tourney and lose in the playin game than make the NIT final 4.
This a horrible take..stop talking IMMEDIATELY
.the first four is making the ncaa tournament
Ask ucla
I would take losing 10 straight times in the First Four games to winning 10 NIT championships and I think the players and 99% of the fans would agree
This is one of the worst takes I've ever seen. I'll barely watch the NIT after 2 straight NCAA years (as opposed to the Douby team where it was our first NIT in awhile), whereas I'd be glued to the TV for Dayton and would be there if I could - flying back from FL Tuesday late afternoon...
you know that they will save the Dayton picks for last
Just to keep the interest going......
They announce the Dayton games as soon as they get to the corresponding 5/12 or 6/11 games.
there were some wins for us and some losses, it seems
It would be tough to figure that it all would go our way
They'll include them as they run down whatever region they wind up in.
The key to watch for is not seeing Wake Forest, Notre Dame, a second A10 team, Xavier, etc pop up.
That's an insane take... Nobody gaf about the NIT this isn't 2004
ucla won the play in game. My argument is moot if Rutgers wins the play in game
Yes, you are the 1% (actually maybe the 0.1%)
Similar threads
