ADVERTISEMENT

Backlash has begun

I don’t think there should be byes. Why should 3rd and 4th seeds have a home game on campus but 1st and 2nd not?

1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 4 v 5 on home campuses, then semis and at bowl sites (rotate different 2 every year)
No home games for anyone. Just use the bowls. 1 and 2 get byes. 3 v 6 and 4 v 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikemarc1
Two of the playoff games today aren’t on ESPN, they are on TNT/TBS . I’m not sure who owns what regarding networks, but I’m sure there was a competitive process with the conferences regarding tv coverage.
Contract is with ESPN and they are sub-licensing games to TNT/TBS.

GO RU
 
ESPN through Sean McDonough went out of its way to create the narrative that Indiana wasn’t deserving over SEC teams. Can’t stand ND but may be good for Georgia to lose and shove it in ESPN’s face.

GO RU
If the 4th best team in the SEC (bama) wanted to be in the playoffs... Then don't lose 2 games to 6-6 teams... Indiana may not have a marquee win... But they had zero bad losses... And were pretty dominant against everyone else...
 
Rooting big here for Clemson...

(If the SEC is so arrogant and greedy, just play yourselves and have a round robin in December and call yourself National Champions.....and make the regular season worthless).
 
The games are still ESPN properties and produced by ESPN. These are being shown on TNT / TBS as part of a deal in which ESPN purchased TNT’s “Inside The NBA” programming and the rights to use the same cast of characters / commentators, I believe that includes Charles Barkley and Shaquille O’Neal doing commentary. As part of the deal ESPN is providing several college football games to TNT / Turner Broadcasting. Beyond the first round playoff games they also are sharing several Big 12 football games in the 2025 season.
Ah, that explains why ESPN is producing the TNT games, thanks
 
Chalky weekend is to be expected. Wont judge the expanded format until after the next round. I’d rather be watching these games than 5th rate bowls this weekend
i just want to see ryan day and his team get abused on national tv.
 
What's ESPN's ACC narrative now?

BCSTFU_dark.png
 
The whole thing stinks and none of these games have been interesting.

TV and money rule the day, I get that, but I still think the BCS was the best system.

They said expanded playoff wouldn't dilute the regular season - it has. They said limiting to 4 is too few and there wouldn't be arguments over top 12. There are. They said it wouldn't destroy the bowls. It completely has and no one cares about most of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Magoo
The whole thing stinks and none of these games have been interesting.

TV and money rule the day, I get that, but I still think the BCS was the best system.

They said expanded playoff wouldn't dilute the regular season - it has. They said limiting to 4 is too few and there wouldn't be arguments over top 12. There are. They said it wouldn't destroy the bowls. It completely has and no one cares about most of them.
These first few games have been blowouts . Ugh
 
The whole thing stinks and none of these games have been interesting.

TV and money rule the day, I get that, but I still think the BCS was the best system.

They said expanded playoff wouldn't dilute the regular season - it has. They said limiting to 4 is too few and there wouldn't be arguments over top 12. There are. They said it wouldn't destroy the bowls. It completely has and no one cares about most of them.
Completely disagree, the regular season was one of the most memorable in recent history. So many games across all conferences that actually meant something. Made watching CFB fun again.
 
I don't care that these haven't been all that close. I think the 12 team playoff is a great development for college football. Home field advantage, maybe that is a bit much for this round, but the better seeding should result in a benefit.
You like watching blowouts ? Sad .
 
You like watching blowouts ? Sad .
Where did I say that I did?

Championship weekend was GREAT this season because most of those games MATTERED for the playoffs. If it was a four game playoff, how many of them would have been meaningful? SEC, B1G, and that might have been it. Oregon and Georgia would have been in, with an argument about OSU, PSU, Texas, and Notre Dame for the last two spots. Been there, seen that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virginiarufan
None of these first round games were very good, they were all bad match ups. Every higher seed won including OSU spanking Tennessee tonight. What it shows is that going to 12 team from 4 was a mistake. Probably should have expanded to only 6 or 8, then you'd likely have better quality games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow
They shouldn’t have home games. I get why they do but in almost every case- when you get to this level, these home teams have always been almost impossible to beat on their home turf
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-
Wait till the coming week and Arizona State and Boise State get roasted for having 1st round byes. The complaints will continue and rightfully so. Initial 12-team playoff idea in theory is a good one I think, execution stinks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84
2 expanded CFP games so far.....2 completely pointless and unnecessary games. Great job!

Complete and utter garbage. Go back to 4 (but I can stomach 6).
Is it better to determine Indidna didn’t belong by playing a game or having a bunch of people in a room decide? I don’t know why anyone wants sports to determined by a committee rather than on the field actually playing the game.

Rutgers was handed a gift schedule this year. If they had gone 11-1 you are telling me it is better for a comittee, some who whom never even played the game determine weather Rutgers deserved to be in? You would prefer that over actually giving Rutgers a chance to prove they belong? You would rather see a 11-1 Rutgers team play say a 3 loss sec team in some bowl where all the star players opt out? You know it would happen because Schiano style of play is not going to pass the looks test that the committees love.

I don’t care if SMU deserved or didn’t deserve to be in. I got to spend another weekend watching the game that I love with my dad rooting for the team that we love. A game that both teams had a reason to play and both teams gave their all. I will take that any day then determining who plays in a hotel ballroom.
 
It all comes down to would you rather have it decided on the field or in a posh hotel ballroom in Grapevine Texas?
You know there is a quote button so you’re not posting the same comment in different posts?
 
The only ones complaining are those left out. No system is perfect but this is pretty good. Indiana vs ND just about shut down the state with interest. I’m sure SMU, Tenn, and Clemson fans were plenty interested. Winner moves on. Eventually the teams playing the best at that moment will win.
 
Indiana whooped a lot of good and mediocre teams. They played 2 top teams and got beat up. With a 12 team playoff the bottom half are not going to be as good as the top half. But on any given day upsets can happen.

I didn't like the seeding with Boise and ASU getting bye weeks. I know that happens in pro sports but this is not the pros. There are 2 really strong conference and the Top 4 teams should get the byes. Next team should play the weakest remaining team and so on.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT