Hey Choppin. What you mention is also a Pikiell issue. Majority of kids mentioned were not right fits for this level skill wise, so of course they left. His recruiting is a real struggle of his.
You can either a) get guys who can contribute immediately as freshmen, or b) get guys who need to be coached up to contribute as sophomore/juniors.
It's very hard/expensive to fill out a whole team doing the former, and the latter has gotten much harder with the new transfer rules and NIL. If you have a wealthy collective, you're in better shape to either get immediate impact prospects or to keep the guys you want to develop - otherwise, you lose them to other teams.
Pike's success at Rutgers came from getting guys who were not expected to be "day one" contributors, but were more "culture fits" that would grow over time with development. Geo Baker, Caleb McConnell, Eugene Omoruyi, Myles Johnson, Cliff Omoruyi, etc. Baker was a surprise hit as a freshman, and Pike couldn't stop talking about how he was rated 350th or whatever coming out HS... the others needed time to bake.
This past year, we got a mix in our freshman class. Harper/Bailey were sure fire "day one" contributors. Sommerville had plenty of rough edges, was expected to give good minutes as a freshman. Grant and Dortch were solid but expected to need time.
The challenge is - we may lose Sommerville, Grant, and Dortch to the portal if we can't pay to keep them. All three could be key B1G contributors at Rutgers as juniors/seniors... but we may never find out.
We lost guys we spent a lot of time building into stronger players: Young, E. Omoruyi, Johnson, Mulcahy, C. Omoruyi, Mathis, even Mag. Instead of getting the payoff for that time in their final season... they were somewhere else. We also lost guys who were still in earlier stages of development: Simpson, Woolfolk, Griffiths, even Chol. Could they have grown into contributors here with another 1-2 years? We'll never know.
Gone are the days of upperclassmen-led teams with freshmen/sophomores earning their stripes and biding their time... if they don't get the spotlight early, the path to the spotlight somewhere else is easier (and more lucrative) than it's ever been.
The pressure to "get it right" with guys who are ready to go out of the box is much higher - you can't take waivers on projects anymore, because it's highly likely someone else will get the benefit of the work you put into them. That means coaching skillsets that focus on building culture, fundamentals, connectedness, S&C, etc are not nearly as valuable as they once were.
You need to go immediately and don't have time to "waste" on improving the guys on the roster - you need to let some other coach spend 1-2 years on development, then pull in ready-made products from the portal. Which requires $$$ we don't have, cuz the guys we can afford have a lot of flaws.