I disagree, the NBA is fun to watch again--I grew up with Showtime, etc. Give me this over the 90s epitomized by the grinding of Riley and Knicks. My fav team, the Nets, were fun with Kidd running the point.
What we need to admit is the following:
--Irving and Love have hurt the Cavs more than helped--this didn't happen last year because they were replaced by more defensive players and they had to play a certain style
--Cavs are a product of the pathetic East--I agree their best way to win is to slow it down, give to LeBron and go--but they fancized themselves in matching up with the Warriors on offense
--And most importantly, Warriors are much better than last year as a team--they were caught up in the Finals. We have to realize that OKC is the 2nd best team; OKC played out its minds true, but Cavs are 4-5 seed in the West, battling the Clips, behind the Warriors/OKC/Spurs. OKC would be up 2-0 over Cleveland.
--Cavs hot shooting in East hid their weaknesses. They need that hot shooting from 3 to beat Atlanta close in a few games. They tied Toronto 2-2, who was the worst 2 seed I've seen.
LeBron should be playing the 4 and Tristan the 5--but they don't have an athletic 3. They got Frye instead.
Cavs will put up their stand early in game 3, but watch Curry and Thompson have big games and this will be a sweep--as it should be, and lay to rest that Cleveland would ahve won last year if they had Irving and Love. These finals will hurt their trade value. Wiggins would have been so much better for them at the 2/3 than Love.