ADVERTISEMENT

Corey backs up EJ

The team is on a horrible streak during which they are not even that competitive in many games. The freshman star comes out and states his unequivocal support for the head coach.

I am not lobbying for Coach Jordan to stay, and I am not lobbying for him to go. I am however impressed with this young man's willingness to stand up and be counted

No doubt, he is going to be bashed by the internet experts here, and some will even resort to mocking everyone associated with the team. Sad!

"If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools..."


Pretty much of all the criticism has focuse on Eddie, his staff, and the wins/loss record...actually no one here has mocked Sanders or the team player individually except rare example so you can keep that little meatball you just tossed. Only Goode who is not meant for this level has been talked about.
 
One correction. Freeman only played 3 minutes in the second half in the Wake Forest game. When he came out at halftime he was limping badly. I tried to play in half #2 but couldn't. The loss to Wake Forest had was not because of Freeman. We would definitely have won that game if he was healthy and played more than 3 early minutes in half number two.
 
One correction. Freeman only played 3 minutes in the second half in the Wake Forest game. When he came out at halftime he was limping badly. I tried to play in half #2 but couldn't. The loss to Wake Forest had was not because of Freeman. We would definitely have won that game if he was healthy and played more than 3 early minutes in half number two.
Sounds reasonable, but doubt it will be accepted.
No excuse is valid when talking about losses.:boxing:[winking]
 
I watched us blow a 16-point lead at St. John's with Freeman and fail to put away a bad Wake team with Freeman.
No you didn't. Freeman actually hit 2 low post drives against St . John's that extended our lead until Corey uncharacteristically went 1-6 from the foul line to ice the game. Are u blaming Freeman for that or for the 16 point lead we surged to. ?
You certainly didn't watch the Wake game because Freeman was limping the whole game and it was clear he couldn't jump.
You really need to check your eyesight because the stuff you post never happen!!
 
bingo...these were two games where RU had 13 point lead in the 2nd half against dreck...SJU and Wake have like one conferernce win between the two of them. They are young as RU and SJU particular atrocious...yet some will make an excuse that they weren't jelling yet. Me thinks the contributions are being overrated in the long run
Your just as blind as Shill. Get your eyes checked. !!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo
really? scoreboard. SJU was awful and RU had a 13 point lead, a younger and more depleted team and RU melted down...similar against a bad Wake team who had a fluke win over Indiana but is terrible nonetheless
 
really? scoreboard. SJU was awful and RU had a 13 point lead, a younger and more depleted team and RU melted down...similar against a bad Wake team who had a fluke win over Indiana but is terrible nonetheless
Do you think before you type? Did you just say Wake had a fluke win over Indiana, the same Indiana that is in first place in the Big 10? Did Indiana's talent change? Do you ever consider when a team plays another team? A team that starts out playing well, especially a young team, could be pretty good because they are playing with confidence. Wake was a good team when we played them and our game was the game right after they beat Indiana in Maui. They came in confident and played well and RU was still leading for parts of that game . They then won some more games after us. Then the brutal ACC conference schedule started and they lost some close games, started losing their confidence and have gone on their losing streak. You now judge Wake by their present
Record but Rutgers played the good and confident Wake . You do this all the time in failing to consider when you play someone.
You did the same thing with Nebraska. They started 0-3 in the Big 10 and you said they sucked and couldn't believe how they beat the crap out of us and dismissed them. They then went on a 5 game winning streak and they had 2 big time players really balling and 10 guys, a full squad , playing together and confidently. They beat Michigan State on the road during their streak. I told you they didn't suck and you acknowledged that they were better than you thought. Prior to losing Shields in our game, they took Maryland to the wire and were a missed 3 from winning that game at the end. Michigan State, Maryland, 2 top ten teams that they did okay with , so let's dispel your ridiculous generalizations about teams because you are wrong so often .
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields
It's breath taking the many different ways in which RU is a good, well-coached team and has been thwarted from showing it.

For instance, Wake was 5-13 in the ACC last year. Wake Forest is 1-11 in the ACC this year. Wake Forest has lost 9 in a row. But there was a magic blip in time in which Wake Forest was suddenly quite good, with confidence, talent and the ability to execute at a high level that had not been seen before or since. Unfortunately, that's when RU played them. And, then, just as quickly as it came, that fleeting moment left us. Can't catch a break. Yet another amazing twist of inexplicable fate that prevented RU from showing its true self.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletRunner
Sorry Wake had a fluke win. It happens. They played terrible against Rutgers. Stop the spin that they were a good team
 
It's breath taking the many different ways in which RU is a good, well-coached team and has been thwarted from showing it.

For instance, Wake was 5-13 in the ACC last year. Wake Forest is 1-11 in the ACC this year. Wake Forest has lost 9 in a row. But there was a magic blip in time in which Wake Forest was suddenly quite good, with confidence, talent and the ability to execute at a high level that had not been seen before or since. Unfortunately, that's when RU played them. And, then, just as quickly as it came, that fleeting moment left us. Can't catch a break. Yet another amazing twist of inexplicable fate that prevented RU from showing its true self.
Hey Willis, did they just beat Ucla and Indiana or not? Do you even know how hard the ACC is this year? Or are u just like the other clueless posters? Has Danny Manning recruited well? Is he a good coach? Did he have enough years as a college assistant before he got his chance? Wake up!!
 
Sorry Wake had a fluke win. It happens. They played terrible against Rutgers. Stop the spin that they were a good team
Yeah and Nebraska sucks too, right Bac? Your opinion is like a piece of toilet paper!!
 
Sorry Wake had a fluke win. It happens. They played terrible against Rutgers. Stop the spin that they were a good team
Are Maryland and Michgan State not good teams either? Teams that Nebraska beat and lost to on a last possession. Things are not always black and white. This year more than ever there is a lot of gray. Some nights teams look like world beaters and the next night they lose. Do you think Ru played well in the Indiana, Iowa, and Illinois games at home and for a half at Michigan, at Ohio state and at Nebraska? Answer those simple questions so we and rest of this board can see what exactly is your true agenda !!!
 
Last edited:
It's breath taking the many different ways in which RU is a good, well-coached team and has been thwarted from showing it.

For instance, Wake was 5-13 in the ACC last year. Wake Forest is 1-11 in the ACC this year. Wake Forest has lost 9 in a row. But there was a magic blip in time in which Wake Forest was suddenly quite good, with confidence, talent and the ability to execute at a high level that had not been seen before or since. Unfortunately, that's when RU played them. And, then, just as quickly as it came, that fleeting moment left us. Can't catch a break. Yet another amazing twist of inexplicable fate that prevented RU from showing its true self.
Hey the issues this year are the injuries and Eddie when he gets his full roster has to change his entire defensive philosophy . Eddie played great defense at the highest level but he has not demanded his guards putt pressure on the other point guard so the opponent cannot get into their sets easily, not demanded his guards go over instead of under the screens that have led to open 3's, not defended the pick and roll properly , or switched into a height mismatch ..I believe part of the problem with some of that are the injuries but part is Eddie thinking his offense can out score the other team. He has been wrong. The other teams have more and better 3 point shooters and close games get away from him. I fully expect with a full healthy squad back and no transfers, he will change his defensive philosophy. If he doesn't he will not win and he will be gone. I think Eddie wants to win dearly here at his alma mater!!
 
Last edited:
Don't forget to add RU to Wake's list of victories. They are a good, well-coached team that, through a series of flukes, mishaps, and unexpected malaise, hasn't been able to show how good they are. Wake has placed itself respectably along the rim of the kenpom 150 and is likely a bubble team, if not a lock.
 
Don't forget to add RU to Wake's list of victories. They are a good, well-coached team that, through a series of flukes, mishaps, and unexpected malaise, hasn't been able to show how good they are. Wake has placed itself respectably along the rim of the kenpom 150 and is likely a bubble team, if not a lock.
Answer the questions you coward !!
 
Hey the issues this year are the injuries and Eddie when he gets his full roster has to change his entire defensive philosophy . Eddie played great defense at the highest level but he has not demanded his guards putt pressure on the other point guard so the opponent cannot get into their sets easily, not demanded his guards go over instead of under the screens that have led to open 3's, not defended the pick and roll properly , or switched into a night mismatch ..I believe part of the problem with some of that are the injuries but part is Eddie thinking his offense can out score the other team. He has been wrong. The other teams have more and better 3 point shooters and close games get away from him. I fully expect with a full healthy squad back and no transfers, he will change his defensive philosophy. If he doesn't he will not win and he will be gone. I think Eddie wants to win dearly here at his alma mater!!
He's been coaching for 30 years. He will not change his philosophy. Need a defensive minded coach to do that
 
Hey the issues this year are the injuries and Eddie when he gets his full roster has to change his entire defensive philosophy . Eddie played great defense at the highest level but he has not demanded his guards putt pressure on the other point guard so the opponent cannot get into their sets easily, not demanded his guards go over instead of under the screens that have led to open 3's, not defended the pick and roll properly , or switched into a night mismatch ..I believe part of the problem with some of that are the injuries but part is Eddie thinking his offense can out score the other team. He has been wrong. The other teams have more and better 3 point shooters and close games get away from him. I fully expect with a full healthy squad back and no transfers, he will change his defensive philosophy. If he doesn't he will not win and he will be gone. I think Eddie wants to win dearly here at his alma mater!!

Major leap of faith here when throughout Eddie's entire coaching career his team's haven't defended the three well.
 
He's been coaching for 30 years. He will not change his philosophy. Need a defensive minded coach to do that
Wrong. Tom Crean did it mid season. Why do you think they went on that winning streak. Did they clamp down on Jok against Iowa and pull the game out ?
 
Wrong. Tom Crean did it mid season. Why do you think they went on that winning streak. Did they clamp down on Jok against Iowa and pull the game out ?

Then he should have changed his philosophy as soon as the injuries hit.

Or did he just throw up his hands and give up this year?
 
Major leap of faith here when throughout Eddie's entire coaching career his team's haven't defended the three well.
He coached in the NBA genius !! Did the Jason Kidd led Nets running his offense for Byron Scott defend? Since he has been back to college he wrongly decided that his offense will out score teams like the NBA. He has been wrong. He has to change but this roster doesn't allow a lot of those defensive tenets . Next year he has to or else despite the offense being better if the defense does not improve he will continue to lose and will be gone
 
He coached in the NBA genius !! Did the Jason Kidd led Nets running his offense for Byron Scott defend? Since he has been back to college he wrongly decided that his offense will out score teams like the NBA. He has been wrong. He has to change but this roster doesn't allow a lot of those defensive tenets . Next year he has to or else despite the offense being better if the defense does not improve he will continue to lose and will be gone

The reason he was fired from the Wizards had to do with not defending the three...genius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B1GNJHoops
The NBA genius. Defense is optional. NCAA defense is necessary.
http://espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4809

"We've said in the past, the Princeton offense has been watered down with changes that were made," Stefanski said. "We've run a lot more pick-and-roll sets. I don't see the offense being an issue as much as the defensive end."

The Sixers are last in the NBA in 3-point defense, allowing teams to shoot a whopping 42 percent against them. Not surprisingly, the Sixers are 1-15 when their opponent shoots 40 percent or better from 3-point range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B1GNJHoops
http://espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4809

"We've said in the past, the Princeton offense has been watered down with changes that were made," Stefanski said. "We've run a lot more pick-and-roll sets. I don't see the offense being an issue as much as the defensive end."

The Sixers are last in the NBA in 3-point defense, allowing teams to shoot a whopping 42 percent against them. Not surprisingly, the Sixers are 1-15 when their opponent shoots 40 percent or better from 3-point range.
Read it. Sixers a horrendous team forever and were 9-14 the year before with Cheeks. Stefanski admits he has done a lousy job as the Gm giving Eddie the proper pieces. He blames himself. He says they cannot run Eddie's Princeton offense because of the changes with the players. He blames Eddie for the lack of 3 point shooting defense. The Sixers sucked as a team and you are right Eddie didn't make them better. So?
 
Wake did beat UCLA, Indiana and won vs LSU at LSU. They may be mediocre but they have better out of conference wins than Nova.
 
Read it. Sixers a horrendous team forever and were 9-14 the year before with Cheeks. Stefanski admits he has done a lousy job as the Gm giving Eddie the proper pieces. He blames himself. He says they cannot run Eddie's Princeton offense because of the changes with the players. He blames Eddie for the lack of 3 point shooting defense. The Sixers sucked as a team and you are right Eddie didn't make them better. So?
He blames Eddie for defense. The point of the entire discussion
 
I do agree depends when you play a team, are they playing well or poorly.
 
He blames Eddie for defense. The point of the entire discussion
Wait another guy that cannot read. Go back and read the whole article. Remember when you are reading it they are discussing the NBA. With the exception of the Riley Knicks, the Bad Boy Pistons, and Thidobeau Bulls, in the last 25 plus years , the NBA is an offensive superstar league. The NCAA not so much
Do you think the otherNBA teams defend Steff Curry , Clay Thompson poorly?
 
Last edited:
Are Maryland and Michgan State not good teams either? Teams that Nebraska beat and lost to on a last possession. Things are not always black and white. This year more than ever there is a lot of gray. Some nights teams look like world beaters and the next night they lose. Do you think Ru played well in the Indiana, Iowa, and Illinois games at home and for a half at Michigan, at Ohio state and at Nebraska? Answer those simple questions so we and rest of this board can see what exactly is your true agenda !!!

Wait are you kidding me with thia...throw a parade because Rutgers actually showed a pulse and competed...what low standards I guess we are a feared team now. What does that mean. Rutgers is a terrible team...0-33 vs rpi 250 doesnt lie neither does Wake at 1-11/9-14 or whatever their overmark is
 
One thing we've learned from observing this mesmerizing back and forth and, well, then forth and forth and forth, is that everyone involved is a "genius." It's pointed out repeatedly.
 
Then he should have changed his philosophy as soon as the injuries hit.

Or did he just throw up his hands and give up this year?
Yay, hard to do it with 6'2 guys guarding 6'9 kids. Hard to chase and play tight defense with 7 guys. You lose your legs. Have you ever played? Or you just post shit?
 
Continue to attack posters when you cant argue 0-33 and 26 straight conference losses
Answer the question Bac. Let's hear your great knowledge of the game so we don't have to hear your agenda over and over. I directed questions to you just above about how Ru played . Why don't you answer the questions so all the posters or guys that just view but don't post can see where you are coming from?
 
One thing we've learned from observing this mesmerizing back and forth and, well, then forth and forth and forth, is that everyone involved is a "genius." It's pointed out repeatedly.
Okay so now answer the questions!! Waiting for your great insight. !!
 
Wait are you kidding me with thia...throw a parade because Rutgers actually showed a pulse and competed...what low standards I guess we are a feared team now. What does that mean. Rutgers is a terrible team...0-33 vs rpi 250 doesnt lie neither does Wake at 1-11/9-14 or whatever their overmark is
Wow a response.So you say Ru played with a pulse and actually competed! So is that not improvement despite the depleted roster? Posters or Ru supporters want to see some improvement that we haven't given up and play better until the depth and height disadvantages and running out of gas takes over. We have done that but unfortunately have not won !! A full roster next year can turn those games that were lost into wins!! I am a positive poster and you are a negative one. Different prospectives but acknowledge there has been improvements.
 
What questions. .whats your point..to throw some stuff and see if they stick..you dismiss win loss records..you are what your records say you are. I could give a shit who Wake or Nebby beat. I do care one is 1-11 in the ACC and the other is 9th place in the Big 10
 
Wait another guy that cannot read. Go back and read the whole article. Remember when you are reading it they are discussing the NBA. With the exception of the Riley Knicks, the Bad Boy Pistons, and Thidobeau Bulls, in the last 25 plus years , the NBA is an offensive superstar league. The NCAA not so much
Do you think the otherNBA teams defend Steff Curry , Clay Thompson poorly?
The article says nothing that you write. It says they are last in 3 point defense. Seems like Eddie has terrible luck in this area. Just seems to follow him around. Good luck on that change in philosophy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT