ADVERTISEMENT

Excellent, In-Depth Article on Hayden Rettig

not clicking either...this last 'situation' was the last straw for me. I will click on TH articles.

my idea is that we should nominate a person on this board to give the cliff notes version like the poster above did. we know the SL hacks peruse this board...how awesome would it be that they knew ONE person clicks, and everyone on this board gets the 'benefit' of their article

even if you dont like their articles, it would be rubbing it in their face that we're screwing them by legally sharing their content

just an idea...
 
  • Like
Reactions: StyleKnight
You've got to be kidding me. No one could be that naïve.

Anyone, including Al that posts links to that site does not have RU's best interest in mind.

Al has one best interest in mind...and that's his.
 
For you Star Ledger and NJ.com supporters shilling for them because of a positive article or two
Here's the type of RU coverage long time RU supporters have come to expect from the Star Liar and NJ.com and why most refuse to buy that rag or go to that spin site

(look at this article spun so it makes like the Nelligan clause in Schiano's contract was hid and Josh just found out about it

Then look below to a article I had to copy and paste and saved for times like this to show how the Star Liar really is)


Rutgers gave Schiano secret escape clause | NJ.com

By Josh Margolin.. NJ.com

>Much of the criticism being directed at Rutgers has not been about the amount of money Schiano was getting but the fact that it was being kept from the public.

According to records obtained by the newspaper, Rutgers arranged for Nelligan, the university's exclusive marketing agent, to pay the coach $250,000 that came out of sponsorship revenues owed the university. The payments from Nelligan went into a limited liability corporation set up by Schiano days after his February 2007 contract extension was announced.<

http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2008/07/rutgers_gave_schiano_secret_es.html

Now see this and know that clause was already known and reported on by the same rag implying it was a secret clause just discovered

In Dec. 2006, Matt Futterman wrote a story after Schiano turned down Miami. The main theme was that boosters would help fund some of his contract.

*pay particle attention to this part of article*

(>Perhaps, but as Rutgers continues its struggle through a budget crisis that includes cutting six varsity sports after this year, the university will have to enter new territory by seeking private funding to give Schiano his due as one of the country's top young football coaches. Rutgers has used public money to pay Schiano $250,000 and $625,000 from "Nelligan Corporate Sponsorship moneys" according to his contract. That provision refers to Nelligan Sports Marketing, the Little Falls company that sells advertising for the university's athletic program.<)

Here come the boosters
By MATTHEW FUTTERMAN STAR-LEDGER STAFF
Dec. 2006,
Here come the boosters.

>The minute state Senate President Richard Codey got off the phone with Rutgers' head football coach last Friday, he knew what was going to happen.

Greg Schiano was going to stay at Rutgers instead of jumping to the University of Miami. and Rutgers was going to give him more money.

State and university officials were going to have to start hitting up private sources to cover the raise.

"I don't know numbers, but I'm thrilled he's staying," Codey said yesterday after Schiano announced he would remain. "The university has to make the decision for what is best and how much success they can accomplish. They came within an inch of the Orange Bowl and maybe another $10 million when you consider the intangibles. Are those intangibles worth it? I think they are."

Perhaps, but as Rutgers continues its struggle through a budget crisis that includes cutting six varsity sports after this year, the university will have to enter new territory by seeking private funding to give Schiano his due as one of the country's top young football coaches. Rutgers has used public money to pay Schiano $250,000 and $625,000 from "Nelligan Corporate Sponsorship moneys" according to his contract. That provision refers to Nelligan Sports Marketing, the Little Falls company that sells advertising for the university's athletic program.

The guaranteed money rises to $675,000 from 2007 through 2010 and to $750,000 in 2011 and 2012. Now Rutgers will follow the formula of several other major public universities, which often turn to local alumni and businesses to pay a substantial chunk of their football coach's salary.

Seton Hall did it in the 1980s when it wanted to keep basketball coach P.J. Carlesimo and asked its well-known supporters, including Robert Brennan, Frank Walsh and Dennis Kozlowski, to donate money for the specific purpose of giving the coach more. In exchange, boosters get prime seats and entertainment at games, and access to the coaches, who come speak to their companies or local teams for free.

It's a step that has burned football programs in the past, when boosters have gotten too close to the team and handed no-show jobs to players, but college sports experts say if the proper controls are put in place, everyone can win.

"To compete at the highest level, you have to have involvement from private dollars and alumni," said T.J. Nelligan, principal at Nelligan Sports Marketing, which serves as Rutgers' link to the corporate community. "Greg Schiano did the best job of any college coach in any sport in the country. He put the school on the map. He deserves to be paid with the top people in his industry."

Coaches including the University of Southern California's Pete Carroll, Notre Dame's Charlie Weis, and Ohio State's Jim Tressel, receive about $2 million to $3 million each year.

Schiano likely would receive about half that, which would make him one of the highest-paid coaches in the Big East Conference.

George Zoffinger, chief executive of the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority and the chairman of the Rutgers board of governors audit committee, said raising a half-million dollars from local alumni and business interests for Schiano was the right move if it means saving the six sports the university wants to cut.

"You have a lot of people in these (Olympic) sports that have been cut resentful of the football program," Zoffinger said. "If we could do both things — save the other sports and keep Schiano for the long term — it could work because the success of the program is generating excess funds to do that."

With Schiano staying, Rutgers also is likely to want to expand the stadium and add luxury suites and club seating, which could cost tens of millions of dollars, Zoffinger said. Ron Giaconia, chairman of the intercollegiate athletics committee for the university's board of governors said turning to private sources to enhance athletics spending would be nothing new for Rutgers.

"The Scarlet R already raises $6 million a year," Giaconia said of the athletic department's fundraising arm. "The president and the athletic director have a good idea of what they have to do, and they have already received enough instruction."<

To you Star Ledger /NJ.com supporters, gush over their articles all you want, but long time RU FB supporters know how the Star Liar and NJOnlie.com will spin anything they can in their effort to make the RU FB program look like a rogue program out of control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ruready07
Surprised there are some guys here still trying to push these articles on us. Why? We can't get a collective effort going against njcom.? There are people trying to hurt our program and we can find ways to defend it? No way.
I have friends and family in this program and these star ledger losers are threatening their success and the program's success. Screw them .
^^^^^^^^^^^^
This. Why is it so hard to just stay away? They are a cancer that needs to be dealt with harshly.
 
I can wait to see Rettig perform live and make up my own mind. I don't need to support some SL jerk to find out what his opinion is.

Just don't click on their site.
 
This board wouldn`t agree on whether a Rose Bowl victory would be good for the program so it is rare that we are in overwhelming agreement on any subject. That`s why it is a tad ironic and funny that on the very same day that the board is galvanized to remain united behind their disdain for a media outlet, a poster goes and praises and encourages said news source hours later. Only on scarletnation lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeR0102
Solid article thanks for linking it. You can tell he put a lot of effort into it and maybe if we give the clicks to positive content they will produce more of it.

Wow, you really don't get it.

Imagine a co-worker who is nice to your face, but then goes behind your back a few times to try to get you fired. The good articles are meaningless (and don't contain any great insight you cant get from other websites). That bad articles are far worse than many realize. The general perception around the state is not that great things are happening at Rutgers, its that Rutgers is a mess. Why do you think that is?? Probably because the most widely read paper contrives a scandal every other week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutino
As much as SL likes hit pieces they also have 3 people regularly covering rutgers football (Dugan, Sargeant, TH).
Besides them Dunleavy is covering Rutgers for APP/HNT - he does a good job.

What other add supported/free to read sites have consistent rutgers coverage?

If you want to follow Dunleavy I watch his twitter feed (no account required):
https://twitter.com/rydunleavy

Even if you disagree with SL they are committing the most resources for public (non-subscription) consumption. That is why they keep getting linked.
 
As much as SL likes hit pieces they also have 3 people regularly covering rutgers football (Dugan, Sargeant, TH).
Besides them Dunleavy is covering Rutgers for APP/HNT - he does a good job.

What other add supported/free to read sites have consistent rutgers coverage?

If you want to follow Dunleavy I watch his twitter feed (no account required):
https://twitter.com/rydunleavy

Even if you disagree with SL they are committing the most resources for public (non-subscription) consumption. That is why they keep getting linked.

They don't all work for SL, you don't understand how that website works.
 
They don't all work for SL, you don't understand how that website works.

Does your insightful comment change the situation? Everyone refers to SL, yes they work for advanced media and some are page for writing - doesn't change they boycott conversation rampant here.
 
Won't read. Wish RutgersAl didnt link it. If people want to find it, they know where to look. I really think we need to prohibit posting those links here. They are damaging our program and there is really no way to deny it anymore. They have taken about 5 or 6 topics now and run dozens of stories on each of them, recycling the same facts trying to get people fired and damage our school's reputation and public image. If you dont think this stuff hurts us with NJ voters and state funding, you are dead wrong.

A weak Rutgers is a Rutgers that's easy to cut funding on, play politics with.

I'm glad he did. They can determine which stories generate the most traffic. Going there for only POSITIVE stories and ignoring the BS could change their priorities.
 
I'm glad he did. They can determine which stories generate the most traffic. Going there for only POSITIVE stories and ignoring the BS could change their priorities.

Forget them, they had their chance and now must be destroyed. It doesn't matter if they start putting out fair articles or not, they need to go away. Other papers will step up their coverage to fill the void
 
The only way I way I would ever click on a NJ.com link (other than T Hunt) is if someone could tell me how to blow my nose or wipe my *ss with the click.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT