Myles Johnson should have guarded the inbounder so he doesn’t get a clean pass off. That happens, it is a win.
C'mon... that was the best possible shot we could have asked for in that situation. I would rather have someone take it from half court than take that shot. It was an unbelievable make. You ask that kid to shoot that shot a 100 times, and he probably doesn't even make it once.
We lost on a gut punch of a shot, and the one thing we're talking about is how we could have prevented it from happening. Maybe Iowa still makes the hail mary play over Johnson and they get a better look as a result. Then the complaint would be: "Why was Johnson guarding the inbounder?"
This isn't a situation like the one where that Illinois kid went off for 35 points.
Just a guess, but I suspect Pike thought best guarding backcourt for a short pass and long runner.
Clearly, not everyone knows that, because not everyone does that.Guys - YOU GUARD THE INBOUNDER. Everyone knows that. Of course this is a topic because the shot was made, but regardless, guarding the inbounder in that situation is the right move.
I think McCaffery going TD pass there is more questionable honestly. Sometimes better to be lucky than good.
No u can’t say that. It was a tipped ball that could of went a million different ways including out of bounds but it goes to them and a turn around fn bank shot. Let’s stop complaining about guarding the inbounder. If they did they probably throw it to bohanion who puts up a steph curry 3 from just inside half court to win and the. The same people would be saying how could we let him beat us. A lucky or u lucky for us bounce. End of story heartbreaking. Boys played incredible.Yes they should have guarded the inbounder
The point is he would have had to come back for the ball and go the length of the court, that's if they could even get it into him. You just can't let them throw the ball the length of the court - now way, never.They doubled Bohannon. If they didn’t and Bohannon hit the shot everybody would be out. Banked from the corner off a tip. It is what it is.
If he only had one guy guarding him you can't guarantee he'd have to come back to the ball go length of the court off the dribble. No way. Anywhere within 10 feet of half court and he'd have plenty of time to put the ball on floor and get off a good look (for him). Pikiell and I had the same nightmare scenario running through our heads.The point is he would have had to come back for the ball and go the length of the court, that's if they could even get it into him. You just can't let them throw the ball the length of the court - now way, never.
Clearly, not everyone knows that, because not everyone does that.
And those that don’t know that - Lose - as we saw tonight.
Some coaches do, some prefer to defend five against four. The value of guarding an inbounder who can run the baseline is somewhat diminished. Can't second guess one way or the other.
Guess who else can run up and down the line: the defender of the inbound pass. In football we love when a qb has to toss the ball on the run. Leads to inaccurate throws and interceptions.This. The inbounder would have fun the baseline and created space from Doorson or Johnson. The pass would have been similar if thrown long or they would have hit Bohannan running towards half court with 1:1 defending increasing the risk of a better shot or a foul.