![www.cbssports.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fsportshub.cbsistatic.com%2Fi%2Fr%2F2024%2F05%2F23%2Fb684d1ff-24b4-414f-aa66-4fac4b87ac10%2Fthumbnail%2F1200x675%2F5eaf741a709dde76c9ee7c4e453c2374%2Fsupreme-court-getty.jpg&hash=f8d79c6435b1da7ed6510ea151b88932&return_error=1)
How looming House v. NCAA settlement will impact college athletics on and off the field for years to come
The historic legal case will transform every aspect of college sports as we know it currently
![www.cbssports.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbssports.com%2Ffavicon-32x32.png&hash=d6daf9be275275fa4623949148cd5e7a&return_error=1)
Ding ding ding! Thread over with this eagleton post. The rich schools will barely think of this as any kind of impediment. If you’re Ohio state, Michigan, Texas and A&M in Texas, a whole bunch of SEC and b1g schools not mentioned above as well as some b12 and ACC. The rich not only get richer, but create a bigger chasm between them and “those other” programs.So the floor for player compensation will get higher with revenue sharing. But no limits on how high the ceiling gets. Rich stay rich. In terms of creating a fairer more competitive environment it doesn’t seem to do anything.
Fairness and parity have never been the goal of college football's overlords.So the floor for player compensation will get higher with revenue sharing. But no limits on how high the ceiling gets. Rich stay rich. In terms of creating a fairer more competitive environment it doesn’t seem to do anything.