ADVERTISEMENT

How many other schools have hired someone to help in their search for a head coach ?

Kbee3

Hall of Famer
Aug 23, 2002
43,582
34,810
113
Did any of the many other schools that have changed coaches or are in the process sought out help from these "experts" ?
Miami ? Virginia ? South Carolina ?
Has RU ever sought outside help when it was hiring a new coach ?
 
From what I've read a lot of schools do this, and, yes, RU has done it before.
 
Did any of the many other schools that have changed coaches or are in the process sought out help from these "experts" ?
Miami ? Virginia ? South Carolina ?
Has RU ever sought outside help when it was hiring a new coach ?

Executive search firms are fairly common for these sorts of positions. Their job is supposedly to seach for candidates, vet them (so you don't get nasty surprises), arrange meetings. If you've ever worked with a recruiter or headhunter, then it's sort of a supercharged version of that.

Now your mileage may vary with regards to the expertise of these firms, but the idea of using one is pretty standard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Underdogs88
Looks like a whole bunch use it. Whether better to not use outside help, who knows.

College HC placements just from the firm that RU is using:

University of California Berkeley
University of New Mexico
University of Cincinnati
University of Missouri
University of Tulsa
Texas Tech University
Providence College
University of South Florida
Baylor University
Saint Louis University
Seattle University
Southern Methodist University
Wichita State
University University of Toledo
Texas Christian University
Fresno State University
UTEP
University of Akron
Oregon State University
Illinois State University
Clemson University
Bowling Green
University of Memphis
University of Mississippi
Arizona State University
 
Boy...nobody does anything on their own anymore...waste of money IMO....hire them and you end up hiring who you liked even before you hired them minus mucho dinero's...geez..
 
We're paying around $75,000 which isn't a lot and doing checks on our own haven't really worked out well
 
Boy...nobody does anything on their own anymore...waste of money IMO....hire them and you end up hiring who you liked even before you hired them minus mucho dinero's...geez..
Aren't we paying 75K plus expenses. That's not exactly a lot of money.
 
based on the idea that this process is limited to a very very few RU individuals (Hobbs, Barchi, Brown) .... and that there seems to be next to zero leaks ... would say that the outside firm is doing at least one part of the job quite well.
- try to do all of the administrative parts of this with in-house staff & too many hands are involved - and opportunities for leaks occur.
 
UGA used a firm. Landed Smart which was on everyone's shortlist already.

It's common place to use a search firn
 
Out of all the things to bitch about in the RU athletic department, this isn't one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUMBA-JK
UGA used a firm. Landed Smart which was on everyone's shortlist already.

It's common place to use a search firn
I didn't think in Kirby Smarts case it would be necessary..wasn't he long considered to be the next HC there and possibly the real reason Richt lost his job...I know he's an ex Ga player and alum so they hardly needed a search to find or vet someone long on their list and it was truly his dream job.
 
Boy...nobody does anything on their own anymore...waste of money IMO....hire them and you end up hiring who you liked even before you hired them minus mucho dinero's...geez..
Disagree. They're job is to do a lot of legwork that the AD simply won't have time to do (assuming you want him to hire someone in a short amount of time)....do vetting, ask recruits and coaches for their input, set up phone calls and meetings, etc. In addition it allows someone to talk informally to potential candidates to gauge interest in a way that won't get those candidates in trouble for speaking directly to another school's AD.
 
Disagree. They're job is to do a lot of legwork that the AD simply won't have time to do (assuming you want him to hire someone in a short amount of time)....do vetting, ask recruits and coaches for their input, set up phone calls and meetings, etc. In addition it allows someone to talk informally to potential candidates to gauge interest in a way that won't get those candidates in trouble for speaking directly to another school's AD.
Thanks but after seeing the cost from mildone it does seem cost effective and helpful.I thought the price would be higher.
 
One of the main things the outside firms can do is contact potential new hires while the current coach is still employed. If a school knows they are going to fire their coach or they want to find out the interest from a coach who is currently still coaching his team then the search firm can reach out to him or his agent and see if any interest and the firm reports back to the school that hired them then. This makes it to where schools are not tampering and can also always say "WE have not contacted or interviewed anyone" when in fact the research firm is doing it for them. Many coaches also have have it in their contract that they won't actively search for a job while employed by current school to go to a different school. Using the search firm means they have not actually talked to a different school but have talked with research firm.
Almost all schools use them now and many schools don't disclose that they are using them. A school can find out way more stuff if use one vs waiting till coaches season is over to ask them.
 
Boy...nobody does anything on their own anymore...waste of money IMO....hire them and you end up hiring who you liked even before you hired them minus mucho dinero's...geez..
It's about deniability:

"I've never spoken to anybody from USC. I've never emailed anyone from USC. I never got a phone call from anybody at USC," Kelly said. "I have never been in contact with anybody at Southern California." - Chip Kelly

If USC used a search firm to gauge interest, USC can deny contacting Chip and vice-versa. Win-win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyNewark51
Why do coaches need an agent when they look for jobs?
Why do they need lawyers to review contracts?
 
Did any of the many other schools that have changed coaches or are in the process sought out help from these "experts" ?
Miami ? Virginia ? South Carolina ?
Has RU ever sought outside help when it was hiring a new coach ?
Everybody
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUMBA-JK
The other aspect that gets addressed is full compliance with search & hiring policy & procedures - University provides search firm with current University search & hiring policy & procedure documents - they procure & compile all requisite elements - construct complete dossiers on all candidates. University compliance authority audits to confirm all requirement have been satisfied.
Yes, screw-ups happen ... but you are far better protected if you took reasonable & customary steps to avoid oversights - far better than if you just decided to 'wing-it' on your own.
 
Boy...nobody does anything on their own anymore...waste of money IMO....hire them and you end up hiring who you liked even before you hired them minus mucho dinero's...geez..
These people are able to approach people that don't want it known they're interested in another job. Big business uses this tactic all the time to find and arrange meetings w people not known to be looking that are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyNewark51
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT